Published  Mar. 7, 2019                                                           Truth1.org                                see also  Truth1.info

   Truth is my business!            Hoaxtead Watch No. #94

About Child Interrogation Techniques #10


     The following is presented in fair use clause of the copyright law and vitally important in the war to stop SRA and Satanism, or at the very least, expose it, that people might better be able to avoid it and warn others. The following is a description the proper techniques for interviewing children, and understanding how they think and express themselves and what avoid that might lead a child. That said, most accusations of leading children are very exaggerated or more often, completely lied about and distorted.

I will be talking about that as we go along. I reference the piece that I will be discussing.

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol. 7, pp. 89-103, 1984 Printed in the U.S.A. All rights reserved.

0160-2527,84 $3.00 + .00 Copyright 4, 1984 Pergamon Press Ltd


Cognitive Distortion 4. Sometime in the future our society will realize that sex between a child and an adult is alright (a corollary is that in the past, previous cultures have found sex between children and adults acceptable).

Truth1: What do they define as a "child?" How far does that go? 17 is still a child at present, which is absurd, as I see it. But I define child , according to what I think should be our law, as anyone pre-pubescent or small. As an example, I was very small and undeveloped at say 10. Most kids that were 8 were as big as I was. It ran in the family, too. I had 2 female cousins ages 11 and 12, who easily passed for 3 years younger, 8 and 9. They used that to get on rides for cheaper.

Myself at 10 had no idea what sex was and was certainly not interested in sex. I will ponder one thing. At age 8, I thought Nancy Sinatra was the living end in 1967. I wonder if she was gentle and cautiously affectionate, if I would have been receptive. I am thinking it would have been possible. But only with her! Who is to say. But clearly, we have not defined sex, have we! But I think it is much different with boys, than with girls. And as I said, it would have been only welcomed with her and at that time, taking off my clothes for anyone, would have been un-acceptable, ordinarily.

But no woman should be trying to take down an 8 year old boy or give him oral gratification. On the other hand, sure, I might have liked it, but then I might have then tried to get girls my own age going and have it escalate from there. I bet that I would have gotten out of control. It is the right of a child to be left "innocent" until puberty should arise, and then the now adult by my definition of what ought to be, should be allowed to work, is so desired, and breed, too, as long as the parents approve. Obviously, a 14 year old boy, even after puberty, could use some more growing up.

It is my strong contention that parents should be the only ones to have a say over their children, and not the government

I have a special article coming up after this series is done, on a topic brought up be what I consider a top notch super legitimate therapist who does videos and brought up a fascinating experience. And it deals with when do you tell you child about dangers that might be out there. It deals with an entire tribe of Indians suffering from out-of control, pervasive sex abuse, largely due to Jesuits raping and torturing all the kids stolen by the government and given over to the Jesuits. Coming very soon. << T1 END

page 100  Journal:

Adults who are currently involved with children frequently do not want to discuss their present realities. To avoid talking about it, they focus on something else — the future or the past. It is true that in the past, sexual activity between children and adults was very acceptable in some cultures; however, the offender is not living in those cultures, nor will he ever live in those cultures. It may be that some time in the future, our culture will change and sexual activities between adults and children will be acceptable. However, the adult before the courts is not living in a culture of the future, but in the present, and it is current law that he must be responsive to.

Cognitive Distortion 5. An adult who only feels a child's body or feels the child's genitals is not really being sexual with the child so no harm is being done. This cognition assumes that the child will not perceive a sexual assault of his or her body unless penetration has occurred. One could verify this assumption by asking other adults to describe how they would feel if someone were to touch their bodies and feel their genitals. Almost all adults would feel that they were violated if their bodies were used without permission. Children have similar feelings, irrespective of whether penetration has occurred.

Cognitive Distortion 6. When a child asks an adult a question about sex it means that the child wants to see the adult's sex organs or have sex with the adult (a similar distortion is that children are sexual beings, and therefore they should have sex with adults). A number of adults attracted to children report that they would never have participated in the sexual encounter had the child not initiated the activity by asking questions about sex.

Some investigators have demonstrated that cultures attempt to restrict the sexual rights of minors using the same oppressive techniques used against women and racial minorities (Farson, 1974 and Foster and Freed, 1972). Calderone (1977) has championed this cause and identified that the rights of children include the right to know about sexuality, to be sexual and to have access to educational and literary sexual material.

Adults aroused to children have attempted to interpret these statements as meaning that sex between children and adults is the child's right. It is true that children are sexual beings and are curious about sexuality; however, the issues surrounding informed consent remain. In the process of attempting to learn about sexuality children will ask those around them about sex. The adult aroused to children, however, assumes that to inform the child means having sex with the child. This is not the accepted standard of education of children in our society, and is simply a cognitive distortion used by adults to justify their sexual behavior with children.

Cognitive Distortion 7. My relationship with my daughter or son or other child is enhanced by my having sex with them. Closeness and intimacy with others is a goal sought by most of us, and sexual intimacy is one of the greatest opportunities to experience that closeness. The intimacy sought by one member of a pair, however, may not be sought or felt by the other member. When an adult male, attracted sexually to children is able to hold, fondle and have intercourse with a child, the adult feels a sense of intimacy and closeness. The problem is to determine objectively what is felt by the child. It is not

Continues in the next blog #11 in this series, on page 101 of the journal,  the final blog of this series.


 Truth1 Out!


Hoaxtead Watch Article list/Menu page


Back to Home/Index       Truth 1 - The best site on the internet!
Back to Top

                                                       Truth is my business!

The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.  .  .  .   George Orwell

#008000  #CC0000