Perhaps beginning with Jihadi John, who I prefer to call Johnny Jihad, with a
very British accent, I might add, began a series of videos showing Jihadist fake
executions, says I and many others, too. I have seen real beheadings on Youtube,
from ISIS, so we are told. Now many psyops have been carried out, seeming to
show Muslims committing all sorts of atrocities in the name of Allah and
Mohammed. And to be honest, I do not believe a word of it. I want to show why I
believe this is all one big united fraud to accomplish something really big.
Please, give this some consideration.
ISIS had been blamed for a lot of unrest in the Mid-East, and long before
Johnny Jihad, too. But who is ISIS. No, not the Egyptian goddess, in this case.
ISIS is supposedly an Islamic movement according to a narrative being spread
around since it first came out. But now I am speaking to conspiracy theorists
like myself, who are far better informed and insightful than the average
gullible American or any other nations, really.
ISIS is a front for the New World Order (NWO). They are mercenaries for hire,
mixed with US and UK intelligence agencies and likely Israel's Mossad, too. They
created and organize "resistance" to supposed despots, when in
reality, every national leader is a despot. We have seen them all go down.
Gadafi, Saddam, Mubarak, Assad, and probably more than my senile mind can
ISIS has been out to terrorize and to make a point of killing Christians,
too. I'll get to that. They overthrow nations. They conduct drug operations and
human trafficking. In every way, they are indistinguishable from Intelligence
Agencies of the NWO. What they do not seem to be is real Islamic Muslims. Islam
is against drugs. Islam, whether anyone wants to admit it or not, does not want
to tangle with any part of the NWO. And its not because they like the NWO. Far
from it. But they are not stupid and they know full well that if they bother the
NWO much in any way, that the reprisal of the NWO toward them would be brutal as
it has been already. They do not want any trouble from the NWO. They want to
stay out of harm's way. Can you blame them?
They do not want to irritate and anger the big monster. So they keep to
themselves and they carry on with some nations such as Russia, more to deter the
NWO from attack, than perhaps anything else, but also for trade and possibly
weapons. I won't go so far as to say that Islam bears no animosity toward the
NWO. They do not like the NWO, to put it mildly. But they are practical and
sensible. They know that they have no real power or change going against the NWO.
But for that matter, here in the US, significant numbers of citizens are not
happy with their government but they now better than to pick fights with the
mega-beast. I do not find fault with Islam not liking the NWO. I don't like
them, either. But Islam has behaved, for the most part.
Whoa whoa whoa! Hold on! Don't throw the rocks yet. You question that I
declare Islam has been reasonably restrained and behaved. Well, then I will
address that next!
What are some of Islam's sins? Some will say quickly, 911 NYC Twin Towers! I
will not go into details but there are lots of details out there on Youtube and
Big documentaries on DVD and often, Youtube as well. Websites, articles,
engineer reports and much more.
What I will say directly, is that Islam had nothing to do with 911. Who did
it? Quite obviously, the many military and intelligence agencies of the USA and
likely Mossad, too. And don't leave out the president of the time and his
buddies, too. 911 took place in his first year of office. The supposed Arabs in
the attack? False IDs and maybe Saudi supplied agents as well, operating with
the good graces and cooperation of the heads of this great plan, the NWO, led
predominantly by the USA.
OK, what about the earlier attempted bombing of the Twin Towers in the
basement with a truck filled with explosives? First, "they" (US
Intelligence) knew how solidly the Towers were built. They knew it would not do
a thing. But they hoped people would be sufficiently upset to want payback.
Oddly, most hardly cared one way or the other. This gave the US other
inspirations. Since they people were so dull in their reactions, those in power
decided they could get away with far more. Being asleep encourages predators.
But as well, the conspirators knew that to being down those towers was going to
require the most elaborate demolition effort ever attempted. This was not a
stadium or a 20 story building of modest engineering. This was well designed to
withstand about about anything.
I need to point out that the Empire State Building had a modest plane crash
into it. It penetrated but the building was relatively unscathed.
So to blame this on Islam is absurd. I got more to cover but we need to
address a few things here about Intelligence Agencies.
By now, The USA and allies have a long extensive record of psyops. Lets start
with the Boston Tea Party. Supposedly done by Indians, but the British
government's informants assure them that it was the colonists, not Indians.
Let's just say that King George III was not too happy about the affair. But
those in lead of the colonies, Freemasons in particular, wanted to let the king
know they mean business and wanted the colonies, first bargained for with King
James and then James decided that he was the proper owner of the colonies and
not two companies who he first had granted charters to, to do as they pleased.
These companies looked after the interests of some very big influences. The
Freemasons saw the colonies as they proper due, and to be honest, there is a lot
to be said for both sides of that dispute. But this was a notable psyop.
Normally, practical people in power do not sweat details or care about minor
infringements or losses. But if they want to do something bad enough, they will
find any little excuse in the world and make a big production out of it. Then
all of a sudden, a petty little dispute becomes a huge act of war. Destroying a
load of tea was really no big deal. But both the kind and Freemasons wanted the
colonies and those represented a huge anchor in this new continent and both
sides knew that well. So began the war for "Independence." Much more
unclear was whose independence and whose loss.
Now in every psyop, there is a goal and something to obtain. But what that is
may not be entirely clear unless you are a conspiracy theorist who looks beyond
and behind something to see what is really behind an action or plan.
Let me show you an incident you all know well, and show you how different it
could be, depending upon what goals are desire. I point the HMS Titanic. J Bruce
Ismay, Owner or Manager of the White Star lines, was aboard the Titanic on its
maiden voyage. He was powerful. He had friends. He was among the elite of
society. Though Maritime law says the Captain is the ultimate authority, with
the Captain's boss on board, there is no way the Captain should have been
determined to be the ultimate authority. His boss had the power to hire or fire
and The Captain's fate and career hung in the balance. Ismay was the highest
authority and should have been made to answer for all things.
Ismay order the Titanic to go full speed thru a vast ice field off a ways
from Newfoundland. Every ship is the area was shut down till daylight. What
Ismay did was one of the most reckless acts of disregard for human life that has
ever committed. Ismay had that attitude so common among many of the elite, that
there is nothing they can not do and that the gods serve these serve these
insane bastards. 1500 lives lost with good excuse whatsoever. Senator Smith
tried hard to blame Ismay and White Star Lines, ultimately owned by JP Morgan.
But the judges and Maritime commission said the Captain was responsible.
Bullshit! they were protecting a member of the club, namely Ismay and Morgan's
money. 1500 lives meant absolutely nothing to the court, the elite, or even the
American Public. I am just stating a fact.
Now lets put another spin on that. Lets say it happened today, and 1500 die
as a result. Only this time, ISIS terrorsists claim responsibility and say they
did it for Allah to stop the great Satan USA and her friends. Now what do you
think would happen? Can you say WWIII?
1500 die either way, but one gets covered over and another starts WWIII. What
a different a cause makes, huh? In my book, the reason does not matter as much
as the result. In both cases, 15000 lives must be justly accounted for. In Truth1's
court, deliberate reckless disregard for human life would cost dearly. Ismay
would hanging, just for starters. Had the Captain lived, he would have hung,
too. White Star lines would have lost huge sums of money and such a crime
committed by it its operating officers and agents such as Ismay, might have led
this judge (me) to nationalize the company and maybe sell it off after bleeding
it. But then again, Truth1 would likely end up overthrown and executed by the
elite gathering a number of nations together to wage war against me. You can't
win an age of evil.
So back to our day, governments create phony fake events, and claim they were
carried out by ISIS, who they say is an "Islamic Terror." But Islam
has nothing to do with ISIS.
Now we don't want to confuse the goal of banning the right to arms and
weapons for citizens. There have been plenty of those psyops. I want to focus on
"Islamic" (supposedly) psyops.
I want to explore the pattern of a psyop. It is a fake event designed to be
either video taped or photos taken and actors playing parts and roles and being
interviewed by actors or news reporters handpicked to interview the actors
playing victims or witnesses. First, all the reporters always interview the same
people, hand picked people. Reporters, with all the people available, only
manage to find the same 2 or 3. What about all the others?
As regards blood, bodies, bullet holes, broken glass, shooting guns,
explosives, burning, and so much more, how would we know if something we saw on
video was real or just made to appear to be as if real. We see movies do this
all the time. All sorts of accidents, crashes, disasters, deaths, blood; you
name it! We know those were not real. For instance, if we go back to the first
big disaster movies, the Poseidon Adventure, we know it was not a real boat or a
real tsunami and no one really died in the filming. Film makers and film fakers
all know the same tricks. The take brief shots of something and you mind
supplies the missing narrative. We see water rushing in and it looks like the
ship is flooding. Only there is no ship. A couple of rooms made to flood,
perhaps. Maybe it was done in a made up swimming pool.
There have been lots of blood and guts war movies. In "Full Metal
Jacket," you have the sniper's scene where US soldiers are getting ripped
in slow motion by a sniper. Was it convincing? Was it ever! I was horrified. I
got angry. I was watching "innocent" soldiers getting ripped to
shreds. I wanted the sniper dead. Then Kubrick used a very clever stunt. He had
a small delicate "Asian" looking female come out shooting inside the
building she had been firing from. It was totally unexpected and the effect was
powerful. She did not look like a cold ruthless sniper. She sort of stood in for
all the innocent Vietnamese who were victimized, not so much by soldiers as by
USA politicians and leaders.
I was torn in two. at the very same time, I felt rage against the sniper and
against the soldiers. We had no business being in Viet Nam or sending anyone
else there. And our soldiers did not deserve to die. I felt such rage against
the sniper and yet was held/paralyzed realizing that the sniper, a delicate
female, was only defending her people from an unjust invasion of foreigners. I
felt torn right in two.
But my point here is that despite this being a movie, I was feeling very
strong feelings and conflict. video and film have that power. its been known and
understood for many decades. Hollywood and TV have been shaping and molding us,
along with our schools, for all our lives. If we accept everything at face
value, without any critical or skeptical analysis, then we will get fooled every
One of my first deductions, at a fairly early age, say near to 13 or so, I
noticed how unrealistic TV characters and their behavior were. I would say to
parents or friends that life does not happen that way. People are not
reasonable, and do not change and see the light. Things don't normally work out.
There is seldom a happy ending. Families bitterly fight all the time.
When I saw cars on cop shows in the 70s and 80s go soaring thru the air, I
laughed and said, no way! A car would be destroyed taking jumps like that. MAD
magazine once did a TV satire of one of 3 shows, involving the "Dukes
of Hazzard," "Knight Rider," and "The Fall Guy." I
think the Dukes of Hazzard was the feature, but the scene was at an airport with
air traffic control warning the air-born Dukes about incoming traffic from
Knight Rider and Fall Guy. They were all pictured in the air over the airport.
In other words, totally absurd nonsense in these actions movies.
So now, honestly, if you see what appears to be a dead body on TV, would you
or could you tell whether it was false or real? We depend on the context. If its
on a TV show, we naturally assume its fake. If its on the news, we assume it is
true. Murders in horror movies or murder mysteries are not distinguishable from
the real things. We do not have enough, without context and trust, to know what
is real or not. Because anything can be faked in picture, video, or movie film.
How about this! Can you tell whether two people having sex in a movie are
going it for real or just acting? I have sometimes said, how do you know they
are not doing it, to a friend? It is now alleged on a youtube video that some
sex scenes were real. It can not be proved but knowing Hollywood types as I do,
I suspected they would sneak it in sometimes.
Most of us trust authority and institutions to be honest. But we are trusting
far too much. Our leaders and authorities have lied far too many times. The sad
fact is that we have no real way to verify photographs, videos and film unless
we have much more info. Modern day alleged psyops often have the supplementary
evidence needed to show the contradictions to expose videos and events as being
faked. It is the careful attention to detail, or the obvious cover up, that
exposed the fraud and deceit.
What I can say for sure, is that we can not trust something based on
authority or being a formerly trustworthy source. We can not trust our eye, for
often, our eyes are not trained to critically analyze photographs, video,
situations. We do not normally ask critical or doubtful questions. We are often
not suspicious people and in our day and age, we can not afford to not be
critical and suspicious.
No matter who gets elected to office, none will live up to anything they says
they intend. It has NEVER failed. Do you understand that? I gonna quiz ya on it
No politician has ever cared about the broad general population of people.
The politician only cares about those who fund his election and tell him what to
do. He is a slave and "they" are the masters. They often peak thru
lobbyists or even mind control agents on behalf of secretive bosses of the
Both candidates and both parties are controlled by the very same powerful
secretive world manipulators. Parties and candidates only pretend to be at odds
with each other, and they are told to be convincing. They are told to play their
roles well and convincingly.
No candidate can ever get away with disobeying his masters in any substantial
way without being made to pay severely. I cite JFK, RFK, and MLK as good
examples. A good politician MUST obey! Normally, an obedient politician would
never dream of disobeying his masters. The penalty for doing so is usually
Politicians will try to win if they can, loose if they have to, but always
they will lie to the people but never to their masters.
All polls and voting are rigged. Elections are determined in advance, often
10 years or more ahead of time. Many are selected when in college due to
breeding rank of their parents.
A politician will tell you whatever you want to hear. They won't mean a word
We are not run by governments or elected leaders. They are all puppets and
servants. You are run by extremely rich powerful bankers and financiers who
control all corporations and business in one way or another. None can act up or
defy this leadership without going out of business or being assassinated. No
disobedience is tolerated or goes unpunished.
There are no division or wars among the elite wealth of the world. Any
apparent divisions or squabbles are either put on, or quickly extinguished.
lower levels beneath them might be allowed some minor divisions but not extreme
and not for long.
requires a small example. Microsoft/Bill Gates was long ago chosen to be the
controller of the computer industry in behalf, it would appear, of government,
most notably the USA, who acts in behalf of the world elite. Gates was allowed
to violate many antitrust laws as was their predecessor, Big Blue IBM. Microsoft
hurt other computer industries to some degree. Those hurt filed an antitrust
suit. The Court/Government, in behalf of the wealthy elite, Made some
concessions to the 6 or so hurt companies, but were not given their fair due and
share as Microsoft was officially authorized to do what it did and no one was
allowed to say anything about it or they would ruined. Each excepted their
concession and kept quiet. Did you notice how Microsoft never got into the
portable MPS player market and let it to Apple, unopposed and without
competition. I'm just saying.
In fact, I
would go so far as to say that Apple deliberately chose strategies that would
not allow them to beat Microsoft or IBM. Apple kept the Mac slow, small, no
color, no real expansion abilities and a very high price. It gave Microsoft the
10 years or so to catch up to the Mac OS. I can not prove any of this, but I'd
stake my life on it. Much of what you see in public makes no sense unless you
look beyond and underneath the apparent surface.
Nothing is ever what it appears to be. If you do not get suspicious and ask
questions, you will not gain the truth of a matter. It does take some practice
at doing it before you begin to quickly see thru lies and deceit. But if you
keep trying, you will become unstoppable and see thru everything in time.
Then it will be hard to stay out of trouble and you will need God's protection
to avoid them kicking you around.
It is most likely all theater. If they really want to keep Trump out
of the White House, then they will find a way to stop him, up to and
including killing him (as they have done with past presidents). If Trump
"wins" this election, it will only be because the elites WANT
him in the White House. If he loses, or is otherwise done away with,
then we will know he was legitimate. There is no such thing as
"winning" in today's rigged election process. Presidents are
I listed all of the above because I belief I have an inside scoop into what
is going to go down in this election or 2016 in the USA. The points all above
will expose whoever the charlatan is. It won't matter if it is Hillary or
Donald. It will work either way.
Every war monger needs a escape-goat in order to start a big war and do some
nasty things. No politician or his masters want him/her to do out and tell the
truth. People would not like the truth. So a cover story needs to be employed.
Here is the truth:
"We are going to start WWIII so we can set up a phony psyop by which we
can shove world government enslavement down your throats and destroy all your
remaining values and morals and freedoms."
No, that would never do. Here is what they will really say:
"We must destroy a huge threat to world peace and order so that we can
finally established world peace thru a wonderful benevolent world government.
Its the only way to prevent this from happening ever again. Its the war to end
all wars and the government to end all this disunity and division in the world.
We must become one. Unity in diversity. Its like heaven on earth. We need a
world religion to go with a world government. Won't join us in the history
You say those two statements could not possible refer to the very same thing?
Think again! Carve this in stone, if you would. I'll need it to rub in
everyone's face. So now I ask you, who or what will be that escape goat to get
WWIII going? you are already hearing being played up everywhere. You doubt me.
Good. That is why I am doing the next section.
A previous history lesson if you don't mind! As I recall, several abortion
clinics were blown up in the US, back in the 80s or 90s. At least once and maybe
twice, an abortion doctor was killed. Christians who protest abortions were blamed for the
extremism. But I am not so sure now. How would we know if it was really
Christians or a government psyop to make it look like Christians?
North Carolina Fugitive, 31, Charged in Clinic Bombing
KEVIN SACK Published: February 15, 1998
BIRMINGHAM, Ala., Feb. 14— After an
intensive two-week manhunt for Eric Robert Rudolph, Federal authorities today
named the 31-year-old North Carolina fugitive as a suspect in the Jan. 29
bombing of a Birmingham abortion clinic, which killed an off-duty police officer
and seriously wounded a nurse.
Although they have not found Mr. Rudolph, Federal
investigators said at a news conference here that their searches of his mobile
home, truck and storage unit had yielded enough evidence to change his status
from that of a material witness to a suspect. They declined to discuss the
evidence, or to confirm media reports that traces of explosives had been found
in the truck and the storage locker.
>>You know, right off,
this one smells. Why was he only a material witness in the 1st place? The Feds
would not discuss the evidence. Silence. Psyops were done more cautiously back
then ;-) <<
Eric Robert Rudolph, the nation's most wanted domestic
terrorist, was captured on May 31, 2003 in Murphy, North Carolina, after being a
fugitive from justice for nearly five years. He is charged with committing four
terrorist bombings from 1996 to 1998, including the bombing of Centennial
Olympic Park in Atlanta in 1996, which killed two people and injured more than
one hundred people.
Rudolph has had connections since childhood to a number of anti-Semitic, racist
and anti-government movements or groups, especially Christian Identity, a
virulently anti-Semitic "religious" sect that preaches that Jews are
descended from Satan and that God made non-whites inferior to whites, who were
made, "in his image." Identity believers are also fiercely opposed to
race-mixing, abortion and homosexuality. While Rudolph frequently espoused these
views, he never officially joined the ranks of the hate groups he followed, and
is believed to have acted alone in the bombings he is accused of committing.
>>Are you smelling a rat here? For one, this is
the ADL reporting this. They are often involved in these types of things, I
hear. And while he supposedly had voice certain views, he never had any tangible
connections with any of the "hate" groups and is believed to have
acted alone. You mean, like Oswald? Like McVeigh? Like Sandyhook? Aurora? And so
often like a number of more recent psyops in Orlando, Bastille Day, etc. All
lone wolves! Oh come on!<<
Eric Rudolph's Extremist Beliefs
By the time he was in his 30s, Eric Robert Rudolph was fully immersed in the
anti-Semitic and extreme sentiments of the Christian Identity and extremist
groups whose rhetoric he followed, but whose ranks he never joined.
Rudolph was not known to be a regular at extremist protests and rallies, nor did
he create Web pages to espouse his views. Like a few select others-such as
Timothy McVeigh on the far right and Theodore Kaczynski on the far left-Rudolph
appears to have opted instead for violent action.
>>He cared so much about his cause that he did
not ever write about it. Nor was he known at protests and rallies. That no
damned sensse at all. I am passionate about my beliefs and cause. I devote most
of my time to it, and energy. This guy does not sound believable/credible at
all. Get the picture?<<
"A Christian fundamentalist described by prosecutors as an 'assassin'
was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison on Saturday
for the fatal shooting of an abortion doctor, Reuter reports from Pensacola,
Florida. Michael Griffin, 32, showed no emotion when the jury returned its
verdict after deliberating less than three hours. He was found guilty of
shooting David Gunn as the doctor arrived for work at a Pensacola clinic during
an anti-abortion demonstration in March last year."
>>Truth1 >>> Don't know who this Burt was, but he was
delivering the whole narrative for us to swallow. This is the Washington Post, a
typical government liberal subversive rag if ever there was one. We see
unspecified "abortion foes" who were convicted and imprisoned. I'd
like to know more about that. But Burt will not tell us nor will the Post ask.
Real good reporting, huh? We were much more trusting in 1994. I woke up in 1995
when the Oklahoma City bombing took place.
It seems to me in review, that it is possible that authorities of various
types were trying to create a stigma around "severe" fundamentalist
Christians. I have never been a fan of "Fundys," but looking back, I
think they were being framed. The suspects and convicts don't seem to have any
real connections to those being framed. Well, knock me other with a feather all
these years later. Could it be happening again with another group? I really
Today, I hear a lot about Islam and Muslims in the Media, by candidates, by a
number of Youtube videos. They are blamed for all sorts of things. But are they
guilty as charged? After carefully thinking about this for a while, I have to
conclude that no, they are not guilty and not to blame.
Now I am not saying there are not some horrific things going on in the world,
but only that Muslims are not eh cause of it. Wouldn't you prefer the true
guilty ones rather than fraudulent claims and phony accusations? We know Europe
is suffering a major crisis. That is certain !!! We see and hear of many attacks
around much of the world now that are supposedly carried out by Muslims and
Islam. but are they really as is claimed? I want to show why I am in grave doubt
about Islam being behind any of it. So I will start with another list.
1) Muslims are not stupid. They know how big and powerful the NWO allies are.
they do not like the NWO but they know better than to mess with it. They strike
me as smart enough to try hard to avoid confrontation with NWO.
2) The hordes of so called "Syrians" and "Muslims of
Islam" invading Europe is a lie. Almost none of them are Syrian. I have
seen interviews over there expose this. Nor do they look much like typical
I live in Southern Main and I worked at the Portland Maine Jetport from Feb,
2001 thru Dec. 2001 and then transferred to the Remote Parking set up while
construction was done on the main parking across from the Jetport Terminal.
Somalis were pouring into Portland and Lewiston that year. As far as I
know, almost every one of them was a Muslim. They are very family oriented. The
girls dress nice, though very conservative by USA standards.
The young women and teens are very well mannered and pleasant, much more so
than many American girls. The males dress decent. Most of the Somali Cab drivers
would kneel and pray throughout the day. They did have a bad reputation as
"cabbies" who played games with passengers. I can not verify these but
there was lots of talk and complaints. Customers sometimes called other cab
companies. But over all, they are fairly peaceable and behaved. They did require
a lot of welfare and assistance.
The hordes invading Europe were almost exclusively young males of their 20s
and 30s. No families. No wives or children. And they like to raise hell. Somali
Muslims in Portland are saints by comparison. So I am not seeing any real
similarities between what I know are really Muslims and what are claimed to be
such in Europe. I do not believe it. Its a lie.
Now what about the rapes and groping you ask? Again, how would you know if it
was a staged event for which a group of participants may even have been paid to
carry on like wild men, with the promise the police would not act? Did they act?
They did not! How come? It is their job, isn't it? Or do European nations pay
cops for nothing?
What is the difference between a terrorist and a crisis actor? At times, not
much at all. In fact, a crisis actor could also be a real terrorist. For a fact,
if a person accepted a job as a crisis actor who commits terror and terrorism,
then he really is a terrorist, too, albeit, one paid by European government to
The attacks and rapes on females in Europe are very real. I have no doubt
about this. What I do not know is how much European leaders have to do with
resisting or encouraging and promoting it. As best as I can tell, European
leaders are deliberately selling their own citizens down the drain and
destroying the nations the leaders rule. The leaders have become aids to
terrorists and traitors committing treason against their own peoples and
So the real problem we have is not Muslims or Islam but treacherous
treasonous political leaders in Europe, who in many respects seem to share a lot
of the blame for a lot of the rapes going on, as well as creating huge tax
burdens and strains on the infrastructure of the nations. European citizens are
going bankrupt paying for welfare of million of males fully capable of working
but no jobs are open and language is an obstacle as well.
So we do not have a problem with Islam in Europe, we have a problem with
Africans and others who do not show the typical Muslim families and order lived
out by those families. These males seem to be of some Mid-eastern or African
nationality but I do not see any Islam in them. And I, therefore, do not believe
they are part of Islam.
In fact, the fact they are of good young military age and are willing to
cause trouble and havoc, suggests to me that they resemble ISIS far more the
ISIS is not Islam. ISIS is USA-UK sponsored as far as I am concerned. Johnny
Jihad had British accent! How about that! Their videos were all fake. My
favorite was the pilot they made a trail of gasoline for and set it on fire. We
did not get to see him burn, but they had that fake dummy that did not even look
human. Best comedy slapstick I have seen since the 3 Stooges beat each other
senseless with hammers.
Everything Muslims are getting blamed for, is really ISIS, paid and promoted
by the USA and UK as I see it. Maybe Israel, too. There are lots of male
citizens among Arabs and other Mid-East types who are happy and willing to
accept payment for mercenary work for the NWO allies. I have seen many videos of
these monsters who rape children and traffic them, and deal drugs and weapons,
perform beheadings on video. This all had nothing to do, whatsoever with Islam
Our real enemies, like in Europe, are our own politicians and leaders,
elected by us (supposedly) to represent us. I am not being represented as I
want. We have nothing but liars and traitors for representatives. But I can not
see that we have any legitimate problem with Islam. We have a big problem with
NWO trying to bully us into a One World Government, so we can pay even more
taxes and have less rights than ever and less control and less freedom and more
Now I am not saying Islam is without fault and I have concerns as I do with
any group that is controlled and/or organized. In my experience, any organized
or "controlled by a hierarchy" religion is suspect. Does not matter
which religion it is. Satan is the great collector and controller who loves in
infiltrate, take over, and corrupt all religion and have it follow him simply by
not following God correctly. And Islam certainly appears to have clerics or some
sort of leaders.
But my main concern is the bad foundation upon which Islam rests. God began
His worship thru Abraham and completed it thru Moses. That was about 1500 BC.
Prophets were given revelations and they performed signs and wonders. These
foretold a coming messiah which Jesus fulfilled. Due to the rejection of God's
worship by Israel, lastly and mostly by Jews of Judah, God in advance had
planned to restart His worship by means of His son, incarnated as a man through
a womb. Jesus came to allow himself to be wronged and executed without cause or
crime. In this way, his being wronged and uncompensated, could obtain Adam's
many descendants as his own, justified by law (of God), thereby receiving
compensation for his being deprived of justice and law. Her served as a
sacrifice of sorts.
Due to his giving (allowing) his life up for redeeming mankind, and rejecting
the Jews, and to gather all men and nations to God again, would be the task of
Jesus to start and the Apostles to finish. to this end, God willed that His
followers, named Christians in Greek, and would be called Messians, Messianics
or something of of that nature since Messiah meant anointed and in Greek that
was Kristos or Christ. So his followers were called, by the will of God,
Christians. Christians were to go into all nations to gather people to God. As
such, they were not to be meddlers and interfere with the affairs of nations in
They were to obey the laws of whatever land they were in, as long as these
did not ask them to violate God's rules. What does Mohammad and Islam teach?
They were taught to be conquerors and to convert with the sword, conquest, and
war. This is not a continuation of Moses/Prophets/Christ/Apostles. Not even
close. Islam fails to be what it claims, a continuation. Mormons do the same.
They claim but they do not live up to the claims. Go to my "Modern-day
Heresies section for more on them.
Islam does not accept Jesus, if I understand correctly, as anything other
than a prophet. But Jesus was far more than a prophet. He had been God's very
first son/creation and all things that came after, were created by Jesus, as God
had desired it. One reason for this is that who better to represent God on earth
than His very own son, who in turn, created everything else. Jesus was way
higher in status than Mohammed could ever be. This is problem one.
Problem two is that the writings of Mohammed and his teachings and actions
are not in harmony with all things of Moses and Jesus and his Apostles. A woman
has to have 4 male witnesses to have a man accused by her and convicted of rape.
That is not the standard set out by Moses. It is my opinion that convicting a
man of rape in Islam is impossible. What man would dumb enough to bring 4
friends along to see him rape a woman? And if the 4 friends joined in, what the
are the chances they are going to tell on each other? Zero!
It is my opinion and observation that only women have their heads cut off for
adultery. Now I am dependent upon what the news tells me and they may only show
women getting it. But I have never seen nor heard of a man being executed for
it. My impression is that Islam is a man's and all men seem to stick together
and cover for each other. It may be that they are fine with men cheating. Just
In general, Muslims are known to be very political. They started out that
way. When they become more numerous that the inhabitants they settled with, they
start to try to control and take over. Some Christians do try to gain influence
and pressure over some leaders, but do not try to take over, except for one
particular time. It was the American Revolution. And a good number of so called
Christians supported rebelling against the king of England, George III. This was
in violation of the scriptures. Quakers of the time did try to point this out
and were persecuted for it. But they were right.
But it would be my opinion that Christians should be fairly neutral in all
politics. I do not even vote. To vote for the lesser of 2 evils in not
acceptable. I let the rest of society do as they please so that they can not
blame me for whoever won or lost.
In the past, there has been some Muslim resistance to nations. It is not a
continuation of Christianity and neither are Mormons.
As I see it, Christians, for the most part, avoid direct interference in
politics. I note that Local Somalis where I live, are more politically inclined
and active with issues that concern them, like our generous free hand outs. For
them, it is a government right, even though it is the average citizen that pays.
But over all, they are pretty much like Christians.
Am I suggesting Islam is a danger? No! I have not seen any evidence to that
effect. And I am not about to condemn what I have no evidence for. Much less
sanction WWIII because some Jewish news media companies say ISIS is Islam, or
because might say it. As long as I only have ISIS as the blame, then I would
prefer to leave Islam alone.
One thing we might want to remember. There are many Islamic nations and they
are not all the same. We must also remember that Muslims have been major traders
and merchants in the Indian Ocean and with India and China in the past and
likely present, too. They are able to get along and trade and be cooperative. In
fact, I think Iran is a much different brand of Islam than some of the other
nations. Iran seems to be reasonable and cooperative. She has willingly allowed
herself to be carefully inspected for nuclear weapons or enriched uranium. I can
see no fault in her. In fact, Iran's only "mistake" (not a real one)
was putting a stop to Jews trying to settle in Tehran in large numbers so as to
take over how Tehran is run, which was what cause the Ayatollah to throw them
There is more than one way to invade and take over a country. Go ahead and
try it. But then don't cry if it does not work because someone realized what you
were doing. And as regards the capture of Americans in 1979 or so, this was done
in cooperation with people who wanted Reagan as president and wanted to
humiliate Carter to give Reagan a better chance to win. First thing Reagan did
was to receive the hostages back from Iran at Iran's offering. All just politics
and we all fell for it.
In short, I do not have any real evidence for bad conduct by Muslims. I have
seen horrific conduct committed by ISIS and ISIS sympathizers in Europe at the
invitation of European leaders selling out their own people and nations. I have
major problems with ISIS mercenaries. They are all criminals and so are their
sponsors. Guess who?
Aug 18: I noted a couple of Arabic women with head gear on. Maybe they were
Muslim but most Arabs, even if not Islamic, often have that style and culture.
There were 2 kids with them, a boy and girl near to 6 or 7 each. The kids were
adorned very nicely, more dressed up than I typically saw in school when I was 6
or 7. And we dressed pretty well at the time, 64-66. That was just after the
dinosaurs died off, for "you youngsters."
And by the way, where I live, a small town of near 20,000, minorities of any
type are fairly rare. 20 miles north in Portland Maine, minorities are quite
Some thoughts came to me. As far as modesty goes, the particular immigrants I
saw today were of a good caliber. Far better than the local inhabitants and
"natives of the last 160 years or so. Locals dress their very young
daughters very provocatively and immodestly. Locals are not all that concerned
with religion, is my impression. But I suspect Muslims, if that is what they
were, are more particular about religion.
But my 1st thoughts were, upon seeing all this, that while the modern local
culture was not likely to affect the women that much, it was going to totally
change the kids. I lived for a while in South Portland, 4 years and saw East
Indians more than other foreigner. They were very modest and strong in their
culture. I now see a few while I world in Portland and they are much better in
values that Americans, but I have see a teen girl dressing like American girls,
with the tight thin parts and all. She had an appealing form and wants to be
noticed like we all like. But she is perhaps unduly influenced by local native
culture. But while she is the only one I have noticed like that, I can sure you
that more will follow.
She and others will want to fit in and be accepted by those around her. The
schools will exert very heavy peer pressure, very different from the families.
Any foreigner who wants to come to the USA, will have to face that like it or
not, they will likely be changed more than the natives. But they will still have
some different identity. There will be internal conflicts as well as external
ones. Its a double-edged sword.
But for this article, my point is that not all things brought by foreigners
are bad. I am not saying that immigration paid by tax payers is good. It is bad.
We overthrew the king of England because we did not have representation
with taxation. But when you spend those collected taxes in ways the
voters/tax-payers do not approve of, they you are no loner representing those
payers. You have now become the King of England and if the fomenters of the
American Revolution were correct in their assertions, then our politicians have
committed treason and beomc traitors, stealing money by spending it against the
voters/payers rather than in their behalf.
I do not advocate rebellion or revolution. I believe those are condemnend in
the Bible. But if one accepts the rhetoric of the founding fathers, then what
our leaders have done, has justified a rebellion against treason. But I say to
Christians, do not go along wit any such thing. God will take care of the SOBs.
You can be sure of that.
Our politicians have let our jobs go overseas. They let immigrants flood into
our nation to drastically lower wages in the wage market. The government
does everything they can to destroy peace, prosperity, and unity. But
WWIII might change that for a time. But not forever.
Do you really not understand this to who is fighting in Syria?
They are mercenaries, mostly.
Do you understand they are paid money? Mercenaries fight for
whichever side pays more.
So they armed them and pay them a certain amount. I even know
what these amounts are.
So they fight, they have arms, you can't get them to return
the weapons of course, at the end.
Then they discover elsewhere pays a little more, so they go
Then they occupy the oil fields. Wherever; in a rack, and
They start extracting the oil and the soils purchased by
Where are the sanctions on the parties purchasing the soil?
You believe the US does not know who is buying? Is it not
their allies are buying oil from ISIS?
Do you not think the US has the power to influence their
Or is the point that they indeed do not wish to influence
Then why bomb ISIS? In areas where they started extracting oil
and paying mercenaries more;
in those areas, the rebels from "civilized" Syrian
opposition forces immediately joined ISIS because they are paid more.
I consider this absolutely unprofessional politics. It is not
grounded on facts, in the real world.
We must support civilized, democratic opposition in Syria. So
you support, arm them, and then tomorrow they join ISIS.
Can they not think a step ahead? We
don't stand for this kind of politics of the US. We consider it to be wrong.
Harms all parties, including you [USA].
When it comes to the consideration of our national interests,
I would really like it if people like you [US journalists] opposed to questions,
would one day head your government maybe then we can somehow reversed the
transcript I stopped at 4:20. Its a little over 7 minutes long.
I wrote this back in 2011 Regarding Islam. There was a fairly
progressive Muslim writing, promoting, and talking sense but I think Islam is
incompatible with Christianity, which it is supposed to be in harmony with. This
is on my site here: On Islam and Mohammed
The above video suggests that we have been planning and preparing war with
Iran for decades. I agree. She notes the recent events and players. Well worth
your consideration. This channel has put out many good videos over the 2 years
that I have been watching some of their stuff. They have done some satiracal
humor as well, that I enjoyed very much.
I often go here for interesting conspiracy type stuff. Psyops, Mid-East and
Islamic stuff, too. https://crimesofempire.com/
James Robertson writes this Blog.
Below is a post that I thought deserved to be heard, at least.
I am not sure that Islam has reached a level of tolerance that Christians
come more naturally by, since they have had to blend in to all nations. But not
all nations were tolerant of Christians. Can you say Rome? There were many more
after. But Islam makes converts thru war and conquering, primarily. Their
religion has little else to offer. They do forbid usury/interest-on-loans as did
the Bible/Moses. But forced conversion is not very compatible with tolerance and
living with other peoples, cultures, and religion.
Rome was an empire in perpetual war. And Rome was always trying to come up
with excuses to attack those who were not attacking or bothering Rome. The
perfect example was Julius Caesar's attack and conquest of the Celts/Gauls in
now France and much more and wider at that time with land routes, horses,
wagons, chariots. The Gauls were like a trucking company. They shipped over
land. Carthage and Rome shipped by sea. Gauls had not attacked Rome for 300
years. The Gauls had excepted Romes position and assume that Rome had accepted
living and trading with the Gauls as they had been for the last 300 years. But
Rome was greedy. She wanted the Gauls' markets and venues and money and power
that went with that. Carthage had been defeated. Now who or what? Answer? Gaul.
Could they have both co-existed. The Gauls thought so. But not Rome.
Now world government has been the goal for a long time. I would suggest at
least 1066 AD if not closer to 404 AD. But for sure, the colonization of the
Americas set off what we might call gold fever and world conquest for that was
the Devil's ultimate desire in order to control the world and rebuild the temple
(can you say Knights Templar?) and create a one world religion and a one world
government, that is really a massive slavery plantation.
Islam knows this and fears this as many of us in the USA do, and citizens of
many of our allies as well. So the Western allies are not satisfied with
alliances with Islam. They want to own and control Islam and bring them all
under the yoke of Satan's New World Order. Islam is not stupid and knows this.
Shall we see another Gaul in the future. I fear so.
My advice to Islam would be that they must give up their war rhetoric that
has long been a part of their religion. Now that is not to say they long for
wars. They might have been behind a few acts or terrorism and they have
attempted attacks on Israel or threatened to. But I am not aware of any major
military efforts, save the 1973 attack by Syria, although it must be pointed out
that the head of the army leading the Syrian tanks stopped short of going in to
Israel. Was it because he was secretly an Israeli ally? Or did he just make a
dumb move by not invading? I am inclined toward him being perhaps like a
Freemason or similar and would not attack Israel.
I should point out that many British generals were easy going on the
colonists of the American Revolution. I suspect the British Generals kept
Washington informed of certain plans and allow Washington escape routes as well.
George III lost the colonies primarily because his most important men were loyal
to Freemasons rather than the king. When some colonists headed for Canada, say
Nova Scotia, they left behind many relatives in what is now the Portland Maine
USA area and you can see the common names to both Kings County NS, CA and
Portland Maine USA.
I do not doubt at all that many relatives on both sides kept close contract
and informed each other, favoring Freemasons over political divisions.
But back to Islam. Since the world has nations in power that are not Islamic,
the logical procedure would be to seek peace and adopt an attitude of "we
disown war and do not want to use war to make converts and we want to respect
all nations, cultures, and religions, as long as we can keep our own of those.
In many respects, many in Islam have done some of that. The supposed terrorist
links like Bin Laden are totally phony as I see it. I am not sure that Islam has
been an enemy for quite some time.
Here is the problem. I have no way to verify any connections and the press
has zero credibility and many psyops that have been carried out to date, destroy
all trust and credibility. Just a bit further back, I remind of what John R.
said about the press. Its all fake and lies. But Islam needs to give more
attention to public relations and make it clear where it stands. They need to
get on the net and let people know where they really stand. Are they for peace
and getting along or are they just holding their tongues and waiting for a
chance to strike? I did not suspect a strike but I know the Western allies have
been alleging such things for years. I'm just not buying it. That's all!
I have to say that I do not find Iran as a trouble maker. But like Rome of
old, the modern Rome/USA Empire sees Iran as perhaps unwilling submit to slavery
and modifying their religion. And I can understand why Iran would feel that way.
Iran have nukes. Israel says no way! So the USA says no way. Iran is the largest
of all Muslim nations. She has a long legacy of history, once being the Persian
Empire, no less.
I believe that Iran is one of the objects of desire of the USA Empire/Allies.
Iran would be the most formidable foes the "Empire" could face. So
they picked off all the other smaller ones who might have been able to help,
leaving Iran as the one to make the last stand. That is how I see it. The Empire
will never allow a co-existence with Islam in the Mid-East. Islam hates Jews too
much. Islam knows that and Jews know that and the Empire knows that. That is the
problem at this time.
I express my own sentiment and speak also to citizens who do not like or
trust their government any more.
Can you really be sure that anything you government and its ally, the media,
are telling you? I have come to say no, I do not trust them at all. Why not?
They do not seem to trust their citizens and monitor us 24-7. I have not been
given any credible evidence that real actual Muslims have really and truly been
behind anything harmful. They want to live and exist as we do. They want to
trade and bargain and be treated fairly with their national rights to exist
What I have seen is mock violence (psyops) and fake acts of terror, and it
some were real, they were not done my Islam. Someone pretended to be Muslim or
Islam. The laying phony governments of the NWO and the media have assured us
that Islam is behind it. I don't believe a word they say. I say they want to
enable Israel and Satan to subdue the vast Mid-East so that Israel can rebuild
the temple and priesthood; and as well, get control of all those yummy oil
fields and wells. Corporate American oil companies would love that. And they are
among those who run our country in the USA.
So lets say that may be you are not fully convinced that it is not Islam. OK,
lets entertain that. So we are going to start WWIII. Do you have any idea of the
cost of that, both in money and lives? WWII was devastating to the USA. GI's
came back with psychological trauma (PTSD) and took it our on their families and
kids. That in turn, left the kids in somewhat of a wreck and with chips on their
shoulders. Some vets became drug dealers and they were handy with guns and
Our military budgets went thru the roof and ambitions sought to build
military bases all over the world. WWIII will be about more ambition. It will
bring the One World Government. I'll take bets on that one! Is that what you
want, so they can bully you 10 times as hard, putting all kinds of foreigners
right in you backyard and beside you are neighbors. Your former neighbors will
have no money and have to live in Tent City or some remote little patch of
Do you want to see the young die in war? Because when we have a war, getting
many of our soldiers killed, is part of the plan. You can be sure of that. Then
they can replace them with foreigners back here in the US. All this because
someone says Muslims are dangerous to us and are terrorists who are behind all
the violence of the world. Bullshit!
People of the US are all too willing to engage in wars. Hey, most are beyond
the reach of the draft, even if we had one. Its has always been the young men
who pay with their lives, limbs, and sanity. But I am not in favor of shedding
innocent blood of my own countrymen. The cost is too high. It has never taken
very much to convince Americans that we should go to war.
But for me, it is clear that war in the Mid-East has always been promoted. My
father and I always thought, even back in the 70s, that the Mid-East was going
to be the ultimate showdown. It was that obvious. Israel has tried desperately
to stop nuclear power in Iran, even though Iran has been very cooperative with
being inspected by UN approved nations.
To me, the devil's plan is clear. He has a charade to put on. He has a false
Jesus to promote and needs a temple and priesthood, though the Bible does not
require or allow for a rebuilt one. Are you willing to go along with a big
costly war that will change all the world, just do some fools can have a temple
and fake Jesus? Really? I won't be part of it. I will be against it.
We live in an age of deceit and lies. The question I have is if you are all
up to that or not. If you believe in Satan, then you know he is evil and
always lies. The Bible says he also rules the world. God has allowed him a
chance to prove God and us wrong. And you are going to trust a world that is run
that that maniacal bastard from "hell?" I hope not. but you are seeing
the fulfillment of prophecy in progress in its very last stages. No more
waiting! It is now here!
Let the buyer beware! Make no mistake about this. I believe there are many
leaders who want and are going to promote a war against Islam, as if its people
were the terrorists. But ISIS and ISIL are not Islam. They are USA/UK/Israel
Mercenaries who fight for the highest paying nation that assures victory and
protection. You have all been warned. The war will be based on false pretenses
and many will die and our world will be turned upside down. You will be helping
Satan, not God. If you are a Christian, you have no business supporting Satan's
Federal officials vetting immigrants for visas and citizenship ask hundreds
of questions specifically addressing things like whether “he/she has been a
Communist or World War II Nazi.” But a new analysis of the process reveals
that the immigrants aren’t asked about sympathies for major modern threats to
the U.S. such as ISIS.
The analysis, conducted by homeland security expert Mark Sauter, reveals that
the federal government asks specific questions about a number of national
security threats from the past but fails to specifically address many of the
numerous threats facing the country today.
From Sauter’s analysis:
What we learned: During the visa and immigration process, someone seeking
to become a US citizen is specifically asked in writing if he/she has been a
Communist or World War II Nazi — and in many cases, whether he/she was a
member of a Colombian terrorist organization — but is not specifically asked
in writing whether he or she is or has been a member of ISIS, al-Qaida or
other named Islamist terrorist groups.
The government does ask general questions applying to other terrorist
groups. But it does not keep readily available information on the number and
affiliations of applicants who admit being part of ISIS/al-Qaeda/other
terrorist groups and appears to have no statistics at all on the number of
applicants who say “No” when asked if they support the US Constitution.
Sauter says the findings suggest that GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump
may have a point about the need to implement some new “extreme vetting”
measures he’s talked about for new immigrants to the U.S.
“All this doesn’t mean Donald Trump has the right plans, but he is
certainly correct in saying the immigration system needs an urgent update to
respond to America’s current threats,” Sauter said.