1st uploaded  Feb. 17, 2013                    updated May 2, 2016

Sexual Slavery


Sub-headings:
A Military Transformation     May 10, 2013
A Bridge Too Far
This Just In! 
State Sanctioned Rape     Sep 30, 2013
Rape victim: Retaliation prevalent in military

Combat Missions for Women    May2 016
Military Rapes Escalate
    Mar 26 2014
Global Elitism
The Devil's Mentality
Sheeple: Another Look At A Sad Breed
Latest on Women Being Drafted      May2 016
Power, Idealism, Corruption
Superiority Complex
The Ideal Man

Related Articles


The Premise            
Back to Top

My proposition is that women and children are already forced into sexual slavery and submission, by design and intention, and that it is going to get much worse.


A Military Transformation
Back to Top

This is the account of Germany's use of WWII (And she was not alone in using that war to change things. We did it here, too.) to change society, or at least attempt to. The young teens of Germany were brought to camps for recreation and training. I am recalling this as best as I can, from a History Channel presentation. But when the teens arrived, "training" and programming began in earnest. Germany needed more population to seed their empire with more German people, rather than native of occupied territories. So they convince the young that they needed to breed right now for the Fatherland. The camp leaders encouraged fraternization of the sexes and it was not hard to get them to go along with "breeding," knowing that sex was needed to accomplish that. Camp commanders also made it clear that the youth did not need to tell the parents and would be better off not telling.

But in at least one instance, a couple of parents showed up, due to rumors and not hearing from their daughter. They wanted to take their daughter out, who I believe was pregnant by this time or  would be shortly and she warned them that they had better not say a thing or something might happen to them. They could see they had lost their daughter, so to speak, and knew enough to take the threat seriously.

Part of this might have been part of the Lebensborn program to have unwed mothers have kids and receive government funds or be put up in government adoption centers. What is important to note is that the teens were happy to go along with this liberation and freedom. It felt so good, right? As well, that the government took them away for a month or the summer, is also interesting. Could such a thing be planned for the USA eventually? The best predictor of the future is the past, isn't it? 3rd, the parents lost their rights and power to defy. So the war was used to change morals and viewpoints. The teens all entered a sort of cult together and did so quite willingly, even joyfully. The government became their liberating hero.

Could this happen in the USA? Sure! All we need is a war and crisis. Would teens today really be willing to go off to a camp and have free sex? Well, some of them already have free sex. I am sure many more would like to, if given the opportunity. Sex is a very powerful transformation temptation. We all have libidos and we are all led and temped by those libidos. So surely we can see how that could be used against us or others.

But I see the USA course being a little bit different. I must point out some things first. When young women and girls are abducted, kidnapped and taken to foreign nations or used in the same nation from where they were found, if not even the same state, the females are subjected to brutal rapes and even beatings, alternated with consoling and a little kindness, until the women are broken down and lose their will and hope and just go along with the sexual slavery and become prostitutes.

I propose that this goes on with government and law enforcement permission, or at least looking the other way. Many who call the police for help get ignored. Some even find their daughters and can not get the police to show up or at least show up only after stalling for 7 hours, while even neighbors are complaining of gun shots throughout that time. White slavery, as they call it, is a sanctioned affair, as I see it. It is part of an underground current that suggests far great sinister activity and problems that most prefer to ignore.

2nd, the military has been, for years, ignoring complaints of rape in the military.
Reported July 8, 2011 on WCSH channel 6, Portland Maine: Special Report: Sexual Assault in Uniform

Here is a quoted from a complainer:
Most women ran into a brick wall when reporting a rape. Get over it or some crap like that. One went to a chaplain who told her to move on.
“I didn’t want to say anything because once you do, your career goes down the tubes.”
“Thousands of women -- and men-- are reporting being raped, sexually abused and intimidated by other American service people-- often, their immediate superior.”
10% of men (50,000) screened positive with “Sexual Trauma.”
25% of females (48,000) are diagnosed with “Sexual Trauma.”
In Maine, 601 men and 528 women sought treatment for MST.
Suspected that 20% or less report their rapes.
1 in 6 in civilian rapes. 1 in 4 in the military says Kathy Russin of Togus VA.
Stats for men not known.
Women are said to report less than 20% of rapes or less than 1 in 5 rapes.

Now lets look at those reported numbers. If only 20% of women report their rape, that means the number raped is 5 times that. 5 times 48,000 which = 240,000.

Now if 48,000 is the number of diagnosed MST (military sexual trauma), does that include both reported and unreported rapes? If not, then 240,000 stands. What stands either way is that at least 1 in 4 women is raped in the military, often by a superior, and that it is probably safe to say, that unreported would double that figure. That means that 50% of the women in the military are raped. That sounds an awful lot like a sanctioned policy, rather than an occasional violation of law and code. In fact, it sounds a lot like those kidnappers in the USA who abduct women and girls and force them into prostitution. That only 20% of women report their rapes also suggests that most rape victims are putting up with it, accepting it, or dare not otherwise.

I can not see how that could be unintentional. It seems to have every indication of something deliberately carried out against women.

Now consider that in WWII, female WACs were sent over to Germany and around, to "improve the moral of the men." It later became known that they were there to sexually service the men and keep the male soldiers from fraternizing with the enemies' women, which commonly happens. Boys will be boys, right? But when the citizens of the USA found out, they demanded the WACs be returned home immediately and they were.

However, in Hawaii, the military was allowing lawful prostitution and regulating it to prevent fights and chaos. In other words, they knew they would not be able to stop it, so they ought to at least control by strictly price fixing the amount ($3) and time period for each customer (3 minutes) and forcing use of condoms upon all soldiers. This has also been on the History Channel many times. So in war, all normal rules go out the window.

Is the policy in the military one of conditioned rape to get the women to eventually serve the boys without complaint? What would it take to get them to go along with the sexual servicing of male soldiers? How about free sex, with who you are willing, as they did in Germany. Military brass might object, saying we need all the women to be willing and take care of all the soldiers. OK, maybe start a serious war and convince recruits that sex is important for stress and performance, motivation. Soldiers are far more motivated when promised and given sex. Could the women be tricked that way? If faced with combat service and pay, would women be given exemption from combat, while still receiving combat pay, if they agree to service the soldiers away from the battle field and rotate soldiers going to the front? I think its very possible. The battle field can be very scary. If the women are secluded and protected at a safe base (in theory), they just might take that deal and who could blame them, if they did not know God.

But it is still forcing women to do what they would not otherwise do. Nevertheless, I believe that military "management" will work every angle. They will say that soldiers share a close bond of union, and that the closer they all get to each other, the better and more united and more motivated all will be. If you are in danger from an enemy, you might go along with the whole thing in hopes of getting out alive and surviving the war.

I also ask this! How many male soldiers would volunteer to serve in combat, if they were guaranteed sex every other night or every night that they served? Combat could become quite popular. Many men who might not otherwise get laid, might find this a great deal. I am sure the military will think of things I have not. They have experts who have studied all the things involved and will find what will get results.

I believe, beyond any doubt, that women will become willing or reluctantly willing to perform sex for their male combatants. I want this carved in stone so when it happens, I can say I told you so and you would not believe me.

I note that Romans often forced conquered foreign women to serve in brothels for the soldiers, so this is nothing new at all. Some Christian women were made to serve in brothels, rather than fed to lions or burned. This could happen, too. Female prisoners could be forced into brothels for the boys. Criminal Conviction rates of women might soar. The USA might conquer some Arabic countries and use their women for service. Or whoever it is that they conquer or occupy. Rape has always been a military tradition throughout all time. Considered to be the spoils of war.

I also note that Rome never had any problem with sex with minors, either, at least as concerns slaves. Slaves had no rights at all. If you had slaves and one of your friends to a fancy to one of them, you had every right to allow him to use your slave, if you wanted. Likewise, if you liked one of his slaves, he could let you have some time with her. And no one complained if she was a little young. So what? That was Rome. Nor was it only Rome. Even French nobility often allowed its members to "partake" of each other's maids. Slaves have never had good lives or lives that belonged to them. This is what the coming New World Order (NWO) will bring! The Brave New World.

Now if you are one of the elite, this could be a great time. You can do whatever you please and the elite already do that in secret. Women and children are all up for grabs in secret, so I hear and I believe. But if you are one of those slaves, its really going to suck.

Update: 2013, May 10 - First reported in May 7

I am including not only the Huffington Post, but also reports from PBS World News and Portland ME channel 6 local news.

Military Sexual Assaults Spike Despite Efforts To Combat Epidemic

Posted: 05/07/2013 1:15 pm EDT  |  Updated: 05/07/2013 5:40 pm EDT

Molly O'Toole             molly.otoole@huffingtonpost.com

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/07/military-sexual-assaults-2012_n_3230248.html

 

"Reports of sexual assault in the military rose during October 2011 through September 2012 by 6 percent from the prior year.

A total of about 26,000 service members said they experienced unwanted sexual contact in 2012, nearly 7,000 more than in 2010, when about 19,300 members of the military reported inappropriate sexual contact."

 

"We're all outraged and disgusted over these very troubling allegations," Hagel said in a Pentagon briefing Tuesday, announcing a SAPRO strategic plan for 2013 that aims to enhance commander accountability, improve response to victims, and assess the military justice system.

"We may very well be nearing a stage where the frequency of this crime and the perception there is tolerance of it could very well undermine [the mission]," Hagel warned. "That is unacceptable to me and the leaders of this institution, and it should be unacceptable to anyone associated with the U.S. military."

"The military defines unwanted sexual contact as sexual crimes prohibited by military law, from rape to abusive sexual contact."

 

"Of the unrestricted reports of sexual assault in fiscal year 2012, 35 percent were for abusive and wrongful sexual contact, 28 percent were for aggravated sexual assault and sexual assault, and 27 percent were for rape."

 

>>I have a problem with loose definitions. What is the difference between sexual assault and rape?

As for their outrage, they have been saying this for a couple years now. Why did it take 40 or more years and why has it got worse after what I revealed just above this? They are nothing but liars as far as I am concerned. Here is the biggest joke of all.<<

"Pentagon press secretary George Little emphasized the Pentagon's "zero tolerance" policy for sexual assault in a Monday release responding to Krusinski's arrest. "

 

>>We know what zero tolerance can be when the government, courts, and police want to use their beloved extreme prejudice. Its not fun. But I don't detect any real serious zero tolerance here at all. More lies, says I.<<

 

"According to Tuesday's report, of 1,714 alleged military offenders, commanders took action on 1,124, or 66 percent. This includes 594 cases in which the military initiated court martial proceedings, barely more than the 590 cases in which it was determined that command action was not possible or was declined altogether. For 388 of these, the DOD found "insufficient evidence of a crime to prosecute or unfounded;" for 196 cases, "victims declined to participate in justice system." "

 

>>Prosecution of these crimes seems weak, insincere, as if they were looking for any excuse to find rapists innocent. Of course, I do not want to rule out conduct that is not rape, though is intimidating. It is still inexcusable but I am focusing on rape, not touchy feely or bad jokes told in hearing range. What bothers me most is the reaction of women in that they declined to participate in the so called justice system. Why? I suspect they did not believe anything would come of it and there may be a climate of fear and retaliation. Let me show you!<<

 

"Of the victims who did report an assault in FY 2012, Turner noted, some 62 percent felt they were revictimized or retaliated against for reporting their assault.

"When you have a culture that tries to hide the crime, it absolutely encourages it," he said."

"Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio), co-chair of the House Military Sexual Assault Prevention Caucus, said the startling statistics from the report, in conjunction with Krusinski's arrest, indicate that there has been no progress on the issue of military sexual assault."

"The numbers show that sexual assaults are actually increasing, not decreasing, at a time when the leadership in Congress has made it a significant issue," Turner told The Huffington Post Tuesday."

 

Expressed on PBS news was the fact that many women believed their military careers would be stifled or ruined if they reported. Where did they get that idea? Maybe from other females who have gone thru this? I suspect so! 

 

"Reports of sexual assault in the military rose during October 2011 through September 2012 by 6 percent from the prior year. A total of about 26,000 service members said they experienced unwanted sexual contact in 2012, nearly 7,000 more than in 2010, when about 19,300 members of the military reported inappropriate sexual contact."

"Only 3,374 cases of the estimated 26,000 sexual assaults were reported -- a reporting rate of just under 13 percent for fiscal year 2012 for offenses ranging from rape to abusive sexual contact. In fiscal year 2011, the military received 3,192 such reports. "

 

Let me clarify the above. For these numbers, the Pentagon conducted a random phone survey of military women, though I do not know if it was just those serving or those that had previously served, or both. But earlier stats said 1 in 4 had Sexual Trauma. 240,000 women serve, according to WCSH 6 above earlier. 48,000 or 25% were diagnosed as MST. The new Pentagon study indicates the ratios are even worse than thought.

 

Rapes were said to be 4 for every 1 reported, or 1 in 4 reported. These latest numbers suggest only 1 in 7.7 are reported, which means the rape rate is far higher, nearly double the previous estimate. That's 1.92 times the former rate, nearly 2 times the rate. That is mind blowing!

 

I suspect some of it may just be that some women have coped far better than should be expected. The problem is that every statistic reveals a different aspect. MST or Sexual Trauma, reported broad forms of abuse, groping, rape, etc. They play games with stats and this is the biggest flaw and concern as I see it. They are hiding much worse beneath the waters. Is this an accident? I can not possibly see how it could be.

 

Above a little ways, WCSH 6 reported reported rapes and estimated rapes which were considered a little higher than civilian report of rape. But 26,000 divided by 3374 = 7.7. That means that for every report of sexual assault, there are 7.7 others not reported. Assuming similar ratios for actual rape, most rape is not even reported. Only 13% are reported. 87% are not reported. For rape!

 

Now with these new reported numbers, I want to compare them with WCSH 6 earlier in this section which said:

10% of men (50,000) screened positive with “Sexual Trauma.”
25% of females (48,000) are diagnosed with “Sexual Trauma.” 

25% of females suffer from Sexual Trauma. This is a lose number since neither is Sexual Trauma defined or rape distinguished but Sexual Trauma is nearly the equivalent of PTSD, which is pretty serious.

 

But if those who report, which I assume is not what is reflected in the 25% figure, are only 13% of the real number of rapes, we still have staggering amounts of women who suffer outrageous sexual harassment and abuse. It could be near to 50% rape of all female soldiers/staff. 25% of all women in the military are seriously impaired in psychological function due to abuse of a sexual nature. I am going to inject my opinion. Sexual Trauma is not small or insignificant reaction. Not by a landslide! I believe that most of that number reflects rape or damn personal intrusion, such as frequent groping, advances, intimidation, threats, being nearly constant, no let up. If this is 25% and we assume only 13% is reported, It is absolutely reasonable to conclude that nearly every women is the military is seriously harassed and pursued routinely and aggressively, if not most being rapes or very reluctant "cooperation."

 

Are you comfortable knowing this? The statistics are never well defined, precise, and clear, that is, spelled out in thorough detail. And I suspect that is with good reason. If what I suggest is even close to reality, then it may be that 70-90% of women go thru hell in the military. Need I point out that jobs are very rare in civilian life. Many women join the military because their dads were in it as well. If they get run out of the military and have trouble getting hired in civilian life, which is absolutely a likely possibility since corporate employers are known favor officers and hate whistle blowers.

 

So even in civilian life, women face rejection and persecution for trying to stand up for their rights. Is it any wonder that many just "put up with it!"? They are forced into sexual "service" which would better described and named as RAPE!

 

Bottom line is that nothing has changed and things look worse. Politicians continue to pose and grandstand, but honestly, I don't take them seriously and I don't know what anyone else would, but I am sure there are plenty that trust their leaders.

 

The Dish, Biased and Balanced        http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/?s=rape+military
reports:

"Ackerman uncovers another troubling document:

An Air Force brochure on sexual assault advises potential victims not to fight off their attackers."

"“It may be advisable to submit [rather] than resist,” reads the brochure (.pdf), issued to airmen at Shaw Air Force Base in South Carolina, where nearly 10,000 military and civilian personnel are assigned. “You have to make this decision based on circumstances. Be especially careful if the attacker has a weapon.” The brochure, acquired by Danger Room, issues a series of guidances on “risk reduction” for sexual assault. …"

"While the brochure also explains that sexual assault is not always committed by people who “don’t look like a rapist” — attackers “tend to have hyper-masculine attitudes,” it advises — it does not offer instruction to service  members on not committing sexual assault. Prevention is treated as the responsibility of potential victims. “Rapists look for vulnerability and then exploit it in those who: are young (naive); are new to the base, deployment, area, etc.; are emotionally unstable,” the brochure (.pdf) continues.

The Dish has covered the issue extensively."
   
         End of Dish Quote<<<

Lets get this straight, for the record. Young Naive New recruits are typical recruits and they should expect reasonable protections from attacks by other experienced savy older "predatory" members of the armed services, particularly of officers, the most common assailants. Think about this! A man, full of aggression as part of military training, and made a superior officer, and women are given over into this charge. What could go wrong with that? Well, remember that an officer has far more power over recruits than an employer would have in civilian life. You just can't up and quit the military, either, as a new recruit.

Women are placed into a far greater vulnerability and jeopardy. And far less is done for them. Since we do not seem to be able to reasonably protect the women, I believe they should not be allowed into the military for their own protection. But is this happens, some women, far more desperate than many, may very well submit to constant sexual demands, seeing few other options in life. Is this what we have become? Is this what we call Human Rights, justice, freedom, equality, liberty. Those words mean absolutely nothing now.

Women are simply seen as sexual servants that should willingly perform for their male comrades. Listen, there are a number of cultures who have forced the females of their society or race to submit to any male of their society who desire any particular female. Herodotus said the male Scythian had the "privilege" of pulling up to a female's chariot and help himself to her. Babylonians forced all females to serve at least once as a temple prostitute before she could marry. I could write book on these sorts of things alone.

The theory is that Western Culture was so superior to any that had come before it because of respect for rights and decent treatment. That seems to be gone with the wind. It will soon be a mans' world once again, where women are forced to serve whoever and whenever. Welcome to the Brave New World, ladies! Or you could chose God, who would execute all these thinly veiled rapists, come Judgment Day. Give it some thought, if you will.

I note this! Almost all those who recover from serious mind control techniques, are women. Lots of books written by women! Where are the men? Well, this is how I see it. While men can and do get raped, as part of their conditioning for mind control, as it is alleged and I fully believe in, they are also allowed to rape other women and are frequently required to do so. So while men give it as good as they get it, women have no such options. They get it from everyone and can give it to almost no one. So women have much to gain by leaving. Men have much more to lose and much more to account for, so they are very few. I am not aware of any male names or stories.

It is a natural thing that the Bible seems to appeal most to those the most abused. That is foremost, women and children. I was a former child, of course, as we all were. Those in poverty and servitude also appreciate the hope of freedom and relief that God promises. Those who least like God are those who are rich, powerful, male, and predatory. That is how it is.

Note how Eve seemed to maintain a certain relationship with God after expulsion from Eden, where she names her children, claiming their are gifts from God or replacements from God, Jehovah by name in Genesis, typically omitted by most Bibles with LORD. Adam never is heard from again.

Now another story of nearly the same time.

3 young women, 14, 17, and 22, were kidnapped in Cleveland Ohio and held and raped for 10 years. Yahoo! News reports
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/castro-note-120750000.html
this and then people comment below it as I copied and pasted to here.

8,595 comments (in all)

2118   users liked this comment              26  users disliked this comment      ( 81.4 to 1 ratio, Stunning! That is a 99.88% agreement of this sentiment!)
starofsd  •  11 hrs ago Report Abuse

How does a reporter get a letter from a house that is deemed a crime scene? Our police need to be more proactive....I mean, seriously, the 911 operator could not have acted more bored with this young ladies cry for help..."we'll send a car when one is free?" and protocol for a call like this is to stay on the line with the victim, yet the operator did not. I would demand an investigation in to this shoddy work and maybe the whole system needs to be retrained. Can't call them 1st responders when they don't do their job.
151 replies

My experience in covering these teen abductions is that cops and operators could care less and often ignore reports and calls. My opinion is that they are in on a conspiracy to aid and abet kidnappers who provide sexual slaves to secret clientele such as businessmen and politicians. Yes, a sexual slave ring. No doubt about it as far as I am concerned. Women, young ones in particular, are just commodities to use by those in power and privilege. It is a damned ugly scenario.

The fact that a big response at Yahoo! News shows 99.88% agreement with how indifferent law enforcement is to abductions, rape and forced prostitution of the young and beautiful, who also tend to be naive and vulnerable. All 3 victims had willingly gotten into the car of the abductor. They were all trusting and unaware of how dangerous the world really is. We do a terrible job of informing and preparing them for life. But that is another story. I do an article on Credibility that talks more about that aspect.

Now going back to the military, now that it is obviously a policy in place in the military, to acclimate women into accepting sexual "servicing" as a duty of military service, what shall they do as public scrutiny gets more intense, if it truly does get more intense or more notice? Well, then it becomes clear that peacetime service has not achieved the level of sexual servitude desired by military brass and social engineers. Eventually, they would like to transform all society into this sort of attitude, is my guess, given that Satan would love to give God the middle finger by turning sexual attitudes on their head.

But it will take a wartime crisis, which will enable them to ban all communication while a serious war is going on, and while it is, the women will likely, in my estimate, be given a choice of serving the soldiers sexually, any and all of them, without being "fussy" or "choosy," or they can serve at the front line in very dangerous situations that would clearly "motivate" women to choose sexual servitude to a good possibility of death or dismemberment, or being captured by the enemy who will also rape them, too.

All the while, no one back home will ever know a thing till it is all over. By that time, many might be killed off in the "fake" war so that not many will be left to tell about it all. As well, you can be sure that schools will provide more dorm facilities to specialized educational high schools, of which Maine already has 1 specialized local school and one with dorm facilities located in very remote northern Maine. Coming to a state near you, if not already there. These dorms will one day, if not already, teach or allow a much more open "sharing" atmosphere, if you get my drift. The isolated dorm school is very popular among those going there. Makes me wonder already. This is what Hitler did with teen youth when he was in power. Nothing has changed from then to now. Its our turn now.

This is why Jesus warned about the last days saying, Woe to those giving suck to young children . . . These will be subjected to temptations we would likely have failed ourselves and they will likely fail if not well prepared and warned. Remember those 3 girls who were abducted in Ohio? They were not warned, either. What teen would not love free sex? It is bound to succeed! The devil has been at it for too long. He knows a successful formula when he finds it.


A Bridge Too Far
Back to Top

Will children be up for grabs? Will we actually sink that low? Well, consider that soldiers serving in Viet Nam did this very thing. They raped girls as well as women. In fact, I am sure there is not a war fought where girls don't end up beneath soldiers. Lets stop lying to ourselves. Child prostitutes are the most popular, all around the world. Are you listening? But lets consider some more.

Since we pretend to be really morally offended by adults using kids for sex,  and I mock that sarcastically because I believe that in not much more time, having sex with kids will become the popular rage, once Christians are out of the way in concentration camps or prisons. So I laugh at this feigned objection to kids, knowing most will quickly go along with this. But my case would not be complete without evidence of it happening before and I have supplied some, but I got some more.

I am going to return to the Children of God cult. It started as wife swapping and soon became daughter swapping, too, in some if not most areas. Sons went along with this much easier than girls. I think it was MSNBC, PBS, or some similar station that aired a documentary called Cult Killer. But in that film about the Children of God, which subject has been on 60 Minutes as well, there were interviews and witnesses about girls being scheduled with a different guy each night. The guys loved it and the wives went right along with it, too. Wives shared each other's sons as well as husbands.

Everywhere, where this sort of thing has gone on, adults were most happy and eager to "accommodate" the young in bed. As I said, it has been going on since the beginning of time. There are a number of countries were daughters are prostituted by their mothers or brothers. To name just a few, Cambodia, Thailand, Philippines. I have heard Mexico alleged. I dare say you could get such things right here in the USA. Most poor countries will accommodate such activities. So if parents will sell the services of their kids, can there be any hope that others will not want to use and abuse them? Not that I can see. But how would I suggest that this will happen in the USA? Glad you asked.

There is at least one South American rain forest tribe that had the tradition of sharing the young "women" of 11 or 12, often pre-pubescent, who had recently married, with the young men of the tribe, usually older teens or 20s. They were to bring gifts of food to each girl they had. This helped ease the jealous husband and family, I assume. I am quite sure a number of girls were not that crazy about the "festival."

>>May 2, 2016>>> I have suspicions that many videos of National Geographic and similar, maybe have made this story up and convince tribe people to go along with it, perhaps for some sort of trade. I can not say it was not authentic. But I am suspicious. Only one woman ever said to participate, was interviewed. If it was do great, where was the testimony of the rest who "had such a good time"? I will write an article on this eventually. But I suspect that "Anthropologists" might have been just trying to created a phony story to persuade us that free open sex with teens and tweens is perfectly OK and "everyone" loved it. But 1 is not everyone. And 1 is not enough to satisfy the Bible's requirement of 2 or 3 witnesses. I small a rat.

And mind you, I favor fully developed teens the right to marry and work and have families. Puberty is God's signal that they are ready. But governments delay entry into the world so that the "kids" (teens) can stay in school to be further programmed. But anyway, just a quick injection into a section done in 2013.  <<<< End of Insert

Ancient Greek Historian, Herodotus, in once section of his history, addresses various sexual and marriage customs of different peoples and locals. In Babylon, all women were required to serve at least once, as a temple prostitute, before they could marry. Any man could come along and throw down a silver piece and she had to go with him. She could serve as long as she wanted, but only had to do it once. How did this get started, I wonder? Temple prostitutes were common in many countries in ancient times. They somehow served as proxies for the Goddesses, who I assume were whore themselves. Nice gods, no?

One tribe had the custom that each male guest who brought a gift got to have a turn with the bride. How's that for a honeymoon! One tribe has a custom where the father got to sleep with the bride before the son did. Oh, I'm sure it was done with "love."

Scythians were a people who made great use of chariots. It is said that a man could go up to any woman's chariot and, if memory serves me right, he might have thrown his reigns over onto her parker chariot and would get up into her chariot and help himself to her. A prerogative of the male species of this race and nation. This was done openly in public. No shame, I gather. There were many other customs written about, which fail my mind at this time.

But these customs often seemed to favor the males and adversely affect the females. But since females are in general, weaker and more vulnerable, they are not able to defend their rights and dignity as they might like to. They are at the mercy of men.

I refer now to Genesis 3:16 from the Geneva bible translation, since it renders this verse far more accurately than the King James version. It is God telling woman her sad fate, due to her rebellion from God and His commands:

Gen. 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly increase thy sorrows, and thy conceptions. In sorrow shalt thou bring forth children, and thy desire shall be subject to thine husband, and he shall rule over thee.

Life was not going to be good for women any more. Their desires or will would be subjected and subordinated to the man. In other words, he would get  his way far more often, if not nearly full time and always. Sorrow would be a large part of her life. We might say depression, today.

It is women who are suffering most, since they do possess certain physical gifts that are downright narcotic and intoxicating to men, who end up viewing the sexual capabilities of women as commodities that are to be served wherever a man may choose or whatever man may choose. Women and children seem to be the cursed ones. But I say this to the cursed! God is not missing what is going on. He will remember and He will punish and destroy those men who abuse His "gifts" to man. A woman was a gift and blessing to a man, who was to honor and cherish her as his own body. Children were gifts and a privilege which God bestowed on married couples. Children who are abused will be avenged and with all due extreme prejudice.

Yes, men are behind most of the ill will in the world, along with the devil. True, all kids become adults and women have evil, too, but they are treated with more evil as well. god will set this straight at the right time.

---------------------------------------

I was checking out the SuperBowl controversy surrounding Beyonce and came across this in the Discovery web site:
http://news.discovery.com/history/beyonce-and-the-illuminati-130204.htm#mkcpgn=emnws1

"The Illuminati was a group founded in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt, a law professor in Bavaria."

"Weishaupt shared his philosophical insights with others who joined his group, telling them for example that
“Man is not bad, except as he is made so by arbitrary morality. He is bad because religion, the state, and bad examples pervert him.  When at last reason becomes the religion of men, then will the problem be solved.”

Weishaupt outlined his plans to change the world so that all would accept his teachings.
<<<< End of Article

Weishaupt's quotes really struck me at the time.
"Man is not bad, except as he is made so by arbitrary morality."

By this he means that morality tells man he is bad. It is the morality, rather than the man, that is wrong. Its like saying guns are to blame for killing people rather than people to blame for killing people. Crazy logic, indeed, but that is as sophisticated as he and the devil get. In order to allow a bad man to pursue or have what he wants, simply give him any logic and he will take it. He was close to taking it, anyway. Prisons are filled with those who take what they want, against all law.

"He is bad because religion, the state, and bad examples pervert him."

In Adam's supposed voice: Its religion's fault since it says the thing is wrong and bad. Shame on religion! What? And those dumb states that are still bogged down in religion and moral pretense. They are so outdated and useless. Bad examples pervert him? By examples, I assume he means people who live by example and advocate those laws and morals. Such people and examples will have to go.

This is really twisted logic. What Weishaupt does not address but simply refers to it as "reason," is no reason at all. Surely, anyone can appreciate that in a master-slave relationship, it is great to be a master and is sucks to be a slave, believe me. So he calls being a master and mistreating slaves as "reason." I am not impressed. But he tries to entice others to be masters and enjoy the abuse of slaves. It really is that simple. Period!

"When at last reason becomes the religion of men, then will the problem be solved."

When he says reason here, he means that you ignore your conscience and see the logic of doing as you please, to the detriment of those you abuse, in order to please yourself. To him and others like him, if you ditch morality and just take what you want, you'll find its quite easy to do so. Just make the decision, the reason, to do so. Just flip that switch and turn off your conscience and good sense that should be so obvious.

Lets be honest here. It is true that nice people are easy to slight and  hurt, and even enslave. Dumb people are also just as easy. In fact, the only ones who are not are those competing with you to take what you want. They want what you want and not both can have it, so one is going to have to go without. So Adam says, why don't we bad guys all get together and take what we want from the weaklings.

Adam Weishaupt and his kind do not respect decency and morality in good people. His kind know that they have nothing to fear from good people, but only that the good are easy to harm and bully because, of all the dumb things (sarcasm intended here), they fear and respect God and His rules. But God says the meek shall inherit the earth, not the Illuminati and their pals.

The devil's arguments will be just a little bit better. He is going to claim love in his actions. This is what his followers have always done.



This Just In!     013-Feb-21
Back to Top

Democratic lawmaker suggests that rape victim women should all be disarmed and have no self defense

Thursday, February 21, 2013 by: J. D. Heyes

http://www.naturalnews.com/039193_rape_victims_disarmed_self_defense.html

(NaturalNews) It's one thing for Americans who don't believe in the Second Amendment to refrain from carrying or owning a firearm for self-defense if they choose to do so, but it's a completely different thing for an anti-gun politician to push for laws that disarm Americans and put them at risk of harm from criminals. That is especially true for women, who are often victimized by much stronger, much larger men.

But that doesn't matter to Colorado state Rep. Joe Salazar. As far as he's concerned, even women at risk of being raped should not be allowed to carry a gun.

Get a whistle, not a gun

While arguing for the disarmament of college students recently on the floor of the state Legislature, Salazar said guns weren't the answer for women at risk - "call boxes" and "whistles" were better protective choices.

"It's why we have call boxes, it's why we have safe zones, it's why we have the whistles. Because you just don't know who you're gonna be shooting at. And you don't know if you feel like you're gonna be raped, or if you feel like someone's been following you around or if you feel like you're in trouble when you may actually not be, that you pop out that gun and you pop ... pop around at somebody."

In Salazar's world, absurdity obviously knows no bounds. To his way of thinking, potential rapists would back off if they encountered a woman in a "safe zone." If she were near a "call box" or had a "whistle," her protection would be exponentially stronger because, you know, rapists pay attention to such things when planning their criminal acts.

Well, I can't rape her. She's got a whistle. She's in a 'safe zone.' And look - she's carrying a whistle.

>> Women have been raped in open public with people all around. Screaming for help did/does not work. Whistles will not work, either.<<

 

"Representative Joe Salazar (D-Colo.) isn't a 'boorish, macho Latino' as some have stated. In his zeal to ban guns, he's shown himself to be a Todd Akin-level fool," writes Amy Sterling Casil at PolicyMic.com. "Akin's 2012 comments to the effect that women could 'prevent pregnancy' in the case of 'legitimate rape' arose from his desire to ban abortion, no matter what the circumstance of pregnancy. The statements of both men arose from political zeal which led them to voice opinions at odds with common sense and human decency."

Adds St. Louis-area talk radio host Dana Loesch, "This is the real 'war on women' I've talked about: the progressive insistence that women disarm. Women, according to Rep. Salazar, are hysterical things which shoot indiscriminately at any and everything."

Loesch goes onto back up her assertions with hard stats:

-- In the vast majority of self-defense cases involving a firearm, the potential victim will only brandish a weapon or fire a shot in warning;

-- In less than 8 percent of such incidents, the person bearing the firearm will even wound the attacker;

-- Over 1.9 million self-defense instances annually involve defending oneself with a gun;

-- Nearly a half-million self-defense incidents take place away from the home;

-- And the one statistic that is most pertinent to the issue of self-defense involving women, almost 10 percent of self-defense instances are women defending themselves against sexual assault or abuse.

For real and future female victims of sexual assault, apology should not be accepted

So, not only do one in 10 cases of self-defense each year involve women defending themselves against sexual predators, these women do so a) without wounding or maiming innocent people; and b) without using a "call box" and "whistle."

Salazar has since apologized - sort of - for his idiocy.        "I'm sorry if I offended anyone," he said in a statement. "That was absolutely not my intention. We were having a public policy debate on whether or not guns makes people safer on campus. I don't believe they do. That was the point I was trying to make."

Sources:        http://dailycaller.com        http://www.redstate.com        http://www.policymic.com

----------------------------------------------

>>This only goes to further enforce what I say. They want women used to getting raped and stop whining about it, as if it was nothing to be raped. Still doubt me? Check out the next one:<<

----------------------------------------------

Rape and Killing of 3 Young Sisters Shocks India

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/india-police-sisters-aged-11-raped-killed-18554817

By ASHOK SHARMA Associated Press         NEW DELHI February 21, 2013 (AP)

Police were searching villages in western India on Friday for suspects in the rape and killing of three young sisters, as Indians still angry over the fatal gang rape of a woman on a New Delhi bus in December face another heinous sexual attack.

The bodies of the sisters — aged 7, 9 and 11 — were found Feb. 16 in a village well in Bhandara district in Maharashtra after they had gone missing from school two days earlier, said police officer Abhinav Deshmukh. The area is more than 1,000 kilometers (630 miles) south of New Delhi, the capital.

The victims' mother said police did not take the case seriously and did nothing for several days until villagers held protests.

Deshmukh said Friday that 10 teams of 30 investigators were working on the case and that he was confident they would find the killers soon.

Police first dismissed the deaths as accidental, the Press Trust of India news agency reported. The girls' mother accused police of a shoddy investigation and said they did nothing for two days. Enraged villagers forced shops to close, burned tires and blocked a national highway passing in the area for hours earlier this week, demanding justice.

Police eventually registered a case of rape and murder after a post-mortem of the girls found that they had been sexually abused and brutally killed, PTI said.

One police officer has been suspended for not acting promptly, Indian Heavy Industries Minister Praful Patel, who represents Bhandara district in Parliament, said Thursday.

Cabinet Minister Manish Tewari called the killings a "very, very heinous assault" and said Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was sending 1 million rupees ($18,300) to the girls' family.

The case has horrified Indians two months after they were outraged by the gang rape and killing of a young woman on a moving New Delhi bus.

The gang rape sparked nationwide protests about India's treatment of women and spurred the government to hurry through a new package of laws to protect them.

The gang rape victim and her male friend, who also was badly beaten up in the attack, were dumped naked on the roadside, and the woman died from her injuries two weeks later in a Singapore hospital. Five men are being tried on rape and murder charges in that case, while a sixth, who is underage, is in juvenile court.

A new law enacted by the government has increased the prison sentences for rape from the existing seven to 10 years to a maximum of 20 years. It also provides for the death penalty in extreme cases of rape that result in death or leave the victim in a coma.

>>> End of Article

It took India till 2012/2013, to pass laws even beginning to protect women and girls. Why does that not surprise me? OH, its my cynicism, isn't it? Damn! Anyway, the cops did not give a damn. Almost sounds like USA cops, who do nothing when teens are kidnapped or even found and held up in a building and the police are called and still take 7 hours to respond. An accident? Sure, and I am Jesus Christ incarnate, too! And Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex on 911 came down without any help!

India has had several attacks since December, that made world wide headlines. India has a deep, long standing problem, as I would see it. Islamic religion also seems to protect rapists. I believe, in order to convict a man of rape, there must be 4 male witnesses, which basically means that no one will ever be convicted of rape in Islamic countries.

Further, the USA is outrageous, in my opinion, in the way they treat and prosecute rape, often being very protective of those accused. Lets say a woman was raped in a doctor's office and reported it. Police say she has no evidence since he did not ejaculate inside her. He even injured her back and hips roughing her up. Then they warn the victim that she had better not publish or otherwise publicly declare that she was raped by Dr. So n So. An accident? Unless you are a big believer in Mother Goose and the Easter Bunny, probably not. Our delightful system, systematically seems to favor assailant rapists over victims, most of the time.

I notice on "Law and Order: SVU" on NBC network, they often highlight the absurdities and failures of the law and prosecution of rape. I commend the show for at least having the courage to do that much. But oddly, no one seems all that upset about how indifferent the system is to rape and rape victims.

In the USA, we make the prosecution and conviction of rapists nearly impossible and even if convicted, sentencing is often merely community service and probation. No death penalty at all, that I know of. The Bible prescribes the death penalty, though it takes a strict stand with the definition of rape that would incur execution.

Perhaps of the most surprise to me, is that women, as a whole, have been considerably pacified by the hopelessness of the situation for getting rape prosecuted and convicted with serious sentences handed out. If the perpetrators in power intended to wear women down and get them to "take it," then it would appear that those mysterious men in power have succeeded in much of their goal and only have a short way to go.

But I leave you with this last warning. A society makes itself known for what it is, by the way it treats its women, children, and animals. We do not have a good track record on any of those accounts, except that I think we protect the animals better than we do people. I heard the story of a guy in Massachusetts, I think it was, that got 20 years for attempting to rape a female horse in her stall, but he got caught and stopped before either doing it or completing it. I think he had done it before so they were waiting for him. There are 2 ironies in this.

The saddest one is that 20 years is more than most guys get for the worst of rapes of women. So we protect horses better than women. And hey, there is always the chance that the female horse might not have minded the "attention" she was about to receive. No one asked her, right? But the other is that bestiality was punished by death in the Bible. So not only does the Bible protect the more vulnerable of people, but even protects animals.

If we were to analyze the world wide situation as it is right now, if we were from another planet looking in on earth, what would we have to conclude about human beings? Do they care about their weak and vulnerable. No, they seem to prey and feast on them, instead. After they rape them, they often kill them. Life is cheap and meaningless.

But we do not need to look at rape, a severe crime, to judge humanity. As a kid, I often had adults trying to take advantage of me when I went into a store to buy something. Same with my paper route. Customers were always trying to pull fast ones. So before we cast rapists into the proverbial fires, let it be known that many adults do take "candy from the baby." Kids are just something to cheat and use, with no regard to their feelings as well. Then we have the nerve wonder why they grow up to be angry young men and women.

But I focus on rape because I believe that before the devil is done with us, he will have seduced all the world into the worst of abuses, in the name of "reason" and "love." This is why God will feel justified, and rightly so, in letting most of these people die at the hand of the elites of the world, before He, God, cleans the rest out of the land of the living. That is why God's people will be safely tucked inside prisons and concentration camps so as to be protected from the worst to come.

Incidentally, this is the primary way, as I see it, that God will separate the sheep from the goats. Who gets imprisoned and who stays out to join in on the atrocities! Its that simple. God's people will be herded into seclusion and then the bowls of wrath are poured out on the world. These bowls of wrath are, in large part, the machinations of the elite, as they finally begin their assault on the masses, to kill off the majority of the world. By the time its all done, there will not be that many that God has to get rid of, but He will get rid of a few because He will cut short the grand ambitions of the elite.

---------------------------------------------------- 
Entered Mar 4, 2013

Critics Demand Amazon Donation for Selling T-Shirts that Promote Abuse
By | Healthy Living

http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/critics-demand-donation-from-amazon-for-selling-t-shirts-that-promote-abuse-171433415.html

Retail giant Amazon was asked to make a "substantial donation" to a woman's refuge on Saturday night after its UK website offered T-shirts for sale promoting rape and violence against women. The T-shirts, which were also manufactured and sold in the U.S., included slogans were spun off the phrase, "Keep Calm and Carry On", a famous British propaganda slogan and included shirts that read: "Keep Calm and Hit Her", "Keep Calm and Rape a Lot" and "Keep Calm and Rape Them" for $23–$26.

By mid-morning Saturday, Amazon had received hundreds of angry complaints and removed the pages, but Harriet Harman, the shadow Culture Secretary who called on Amazon to make the donation, told The Independent that the decision to sell the merchandise was "absolutely outrageous" and that "Domestic violence and sex offenses are not something people should make money out of. [Amazon's] supposed to be a public company. My suggestion is they give all profits they made from it to a women's refuge." She also added that Amazon could make a "substantial donation" to End Violence Against Women and Women's Aid.

On Saturday, Michael Fowler, the founder of Solid Gold Bomb, the Melbourne, Australia based company that produces the T-shirts in both the United States and Oxford, issued an apology on his company's website that in part read:

"No words can express how I feel about what has occurred and in no way do I condone or promote this serious issue. I will offer a more in depth explanation of cause to explain what and how this occurred. Both myself and our company and it's associated Solid Gold Bomb brand have never had any intention of the spread of violent slogans or even poor taste humor t-shirts. This was a computer error of my creation and I accept my responsibility in the matter."

Fowler further explained that the shirts were merely a result of a computer glitch, saying they were created by an “automated process” that “relied on both computer based dictionaries and online educational resources ie. verb lists” to generate a parody of “Keep Calm.”

“These were subsequently scripted to position themselves on t-shirts and the associated product data was derived simply from the product name and the 16 word combinations like ‘On’ and ‘Off’ and ‘Him’ or ‘Her’ and so forth,” wrote Fowler. “Near all of these combinations either work or don’t work and are certainly non-offensive such as ‘Dream On’ and ‘Dance Off’ and so forth.”

He also said "These items sat online and on non-indexed servers for the last year and myself and our company had no idea of the issue" and that “As a father, husband, brother and son, I would never promote such product in our company and it was clear to see this when looking across the millions of t-shirts that we offer or can produce on demand. Had these items ever sold, we would have immediately pulled the series and are doing so on our own and Amazon channels worldwide.”

The company may have also had "no idea" that they sold other T-shirts that read: "Keep Calm and Knife Her," "Keep Calm and Choke Her," and "Keep Calm and Grope On."

Amazon.com did not return Shine's calls for comment but an Amazon UK spokesperson said that the "Keep Calm and Hit Her" T-shirts were "not available for sale." In addition, none of the other shirts in question were available by Sunday afternoon.

Solid Gold Bomb had also removed its Facebook and Twitter accounts but on Sunday a new page on Facebook called "Solid Gold Bomb Sucks" with an Amazon logo serving as its profile picture surfaced with 33 likes so far and calls for the public to boycott the brand.

Other critics are taking to Amazon's website and Twitter account posting messages such as "Advocating violence against women is unacceptable. This product perpetuates sexism and is absolutely despicable." The former labor deputy leader John Prescott tweeted: "First Amazon avoids paying UK tax. Now they're making money from domestic violence." And Sophie Bennett, the campaigns and policy officer for human rights organization Object said: "These T-shirts are not harmless fun. The are dangerous and intimidating. In promoting rape and normalizing abuse, they create a context in which violence against women is acceptable."

Whether Amazon will make things (somewhat) right with a donation remains to be seen.

End of Article quote!<<<  >>>Next are the comments that followed:

These were the 1st 9 replies. There was 25 in total, at the time and it may have grown much more since. You can hit the links here to see how it has progress since I grabbed it.

3,825 comments

1135 37 30.7
474 13 36.5
1671 76 22.0
1672 80 20.9
1281 62 20.7
923 48 19.2
799 47 17.0
591 32 18.5
221 10 22.1
8767 405 21.6

The number of likes is in column 1 for each post
Number of dislikes in column 2 for each post
Column 3 is the number of likes, in comparison to the number of dislikes. The percentage of likes of anywhere from 17 to 36 times the number of dislikes. Overwhelming.

At the bottom are the totals for all likes and dislikes and ratios.

Normally, elections are decided by 60% or less. That amounts to 1.5 times the losing side. So 1.5 to 1 or 21.6 to 2?

Clearly, posters are outraged by this supposed glitch. Almost no one believes the absurd excuse given for this. Hey, I guess I am not crazy after all. Its not just me! Everyone is concerned. Don't you wonder about the people who disliked? I notice that in 7 of those categories, the dislikes for each comment are nearly the same percentage, from 17 to 22. Only the 1st 2 responses exceed the average (21.6) by much, at 30 and 36. I say it was the same people voting on all the dislikes. Want to place any bets?

Now my 2 cents! Surely you do not believe the explanation given, do you? An automated process? Not possible, says I! So what really happened? They decided to do a test to see who people would react so such things. They expected a reaction. They just wanted to know how much they would react. I say this is what was and is done in the military right now, as well. That these were up for a year, maybe someone knew it and after seeing this article, decided to act. Or maybe it was just a co-incidence, right ;-) There are "people" who watch ole Truth 1 real closely. Its nice to be loved, huh? ;-)

Solid Gold Bomb, an interesting choice of name all by itself, seems to have quietly slipped away. Imagine that. I wonder who they really are.

Back to war! Listen, if in war, they make comrades "sleep" with each other for morale's sake, you can bet no one in the war will be allowed to say anything to anyone outside, like family or friends. All communications will be monitored or temporarily shut down. While the war rages, no one will have a clue as to what is really going on.

There may already be some silence. Those who  report rape are only a 4th of those raped, they estimate. 3 4ths are not reporting. What's up with those? Have they convinced 3 fourths already, to accept this? I wonder.

But our society, as I see it, has attempted to slowly get women used to being screwed over in more ways that one. I note that in Maine, as likely the rest of the nation, guys who threaten wives and kids are not significantly, substantially, or in any meaningful way, restricted when restraining orders are place on them. We had a recent one in Dexter Maine, the 2nd of its kind in this very small former mill town. The hubby threatened to kill his wife. He had a number of registered guns his possession. Not one of those guns was ever confiscated, if only temporarily. As well, no ankle bracelet or reporting to authorities, even as some model prisoners have to do when on a weekend furlough outside. Nothing! Hubby shot and killed his wife and 2 kids. Nice guy, huh? Good job on the part of police and judges, too, eh? Not to mention legislators who care so much about us all, huh?

Why are all law enforcement and judicial enforcement so very weak and soft going on those who threaten the worst? Listen, if someone threatened, even as a joke, to shoot the president, they'd be locked up and likely do some serious time. Maybe that is what we need to do with hot shots who threaten wives and kids. But they want women to cower in fear and just put up with abusive hubbies. Could it be any more obvious? I don't think so! What is wrong with you people that you do not see this?

Now they put out T-shirts that openly encourage rape. And you all thought I was nuts, didn't ya? Well, who's laughing now?! Actually, I may be nuts, that that might be good thing, all considered. You don't have to be insane to get along in this world, but it helps ;-)

------------------------------------
March 6, 2013

How The State Enables Rape
March 6, 2013 by  
http://personalliberty.com/2013/03/06/how-the-state-enables-rape/

>>Yet another winner from the Personal Liberty Digest, highlighting my very points! Enjoy!<<

        She survived, but others haven’t been so lucky. And Amanda Collins is on a mission to ensure liberal lawmakers do not take away one of the most valuable deterrents a woman can have when facing a violent sexual predator.

        In 2007, Collins was 50 feet away from the campus police department at the University of Nevada-Reno, a gun-free zone, when serial rapist James Biela attacked her at gunpoint and brutally raped her. After he had finished violently forcing his perverse sexual will upon Collins, the 28-year-old pervert went on to rape two other women, killing one: 19-year-old university student Brianna Denison.

        Collins, who has become a public proponent of protecting Americans’ 2nd Amendment rights of self-defense, says she lives with more than the trauma of having been raped at gunpoint. She believes the situation might have ended with one deserving victim rather than three innocents if the 2nd Amendment had been better protected. That is because, at the time of her attack, the young woman was a concealed-carry permit holder; but, being a law-abiding citizen, she was not carrying when Biela’s perverse sexual dysfunctions overtook his respect for the rule of law.

        In recent weeks, Collins has been fighting legislation being moved in the Colorado State Legislature to ban concealed carry of firearms (which was allowed just in the past year) on college campuses in the State. In an interview last month with National Rifle Association News host Cam Edwards, she refuted the claims of state Representative Joe Salazar (D-Thornton) who recently claimed that police and screaming are the most effective rape deterrents.

        Collins said:         If I had been carrying that night, two other rapes would have been prevented and a young life would have been saved. All of these are just sentiments that give a false sense of security. In my experience I know that the university that I attended, the University of Nevada-Reno, they didn’t have any call boxes the night I was attacked. They afterwards installed them but I can tell you that a call box above my head while I was straddled on the parking garage floor being brutally raped wouldn’t have helped me one bit. The safe zone? I was in a safe zone and my attacker didn’t care. It’s known that I could see the police cruisers less than 50 feet away from me, from where I was being attacked but the moment I saw those cruisers, I knew at the same time that no one was coming for me….they were all off duty.

        The young woman took her message to the Colorado State Legislature Monday, where her assertions that guns are an ideal form of protection for women were condescendingly disregarded by lawmakers based on a couple of interesting premises: Men are often bigger than women. And guns hurt some people’s feelings.

        Collins was addressed by State Senator Ted Harvey (R-Highlands Ranch) after asking a simple question, “How does rendering me defenseless protect you against violent crime?”

End of Article quote <<<<

The legislators said that guns make some uncomfortable. Oh, so lets let women get raped then, right? Guns make criminals feel very uncomfortable, too. But I doubt most citizens feel uncomfortable with guns being carried. My personal opinion is that bribed politicians feel very uncomfortable with citizens carrying guns, since bribed politicians represent the world's rich elite 1%, who want to take over the world and it would be much easier if they could disarm citizens, first. But that's just my opinion, of course.

I might also add, that since guns are a Constitutional right (Bill of Rights), they can not "legally" be regulated or restricted in any way, since they are an unabridged right. Any attempt to in any way reduce or limit the exercise of those right would violate the 2nd amendment. For the University to ban guns on campus, is a major violation of the 2nd Amendment and should be struck down in any court of law and police should not even enforce any such prohibition. Prohibition is night a right. But as you can see, we are no longer allowed to live under the laws made for our protection nearly 200 years ago. Already, before antichrist has even arrived, they are changing times and law, as Daniel the prophet foretold 2500 years ago. Do you see the antichrist coming? He is almost here!

But Mr. Rolley and possibly Personal Liberty Digest, seem to believe that preventing women from carrying guns makes them far more vulnerable to rape and I agree. But I go one step further. I would suggest that with all the other situations that make women constant targets and victims of rape, with little to no punishment or deterrence, that stopping women from having adequate defense is yet one more attempt to make them even more vulnerable to rape and even death.

As more and more options of defense and avoidance of rape are taken from women, the result could be such hopelessness that they will either commit suicide, or give in and put up with the horrible abuse of sexual slavery. Ladies, can you see how much the "world" of men cares about you all? The New World Order is not going to be the wonderful salvation that will be presented to you. It might be "heaven" for men, but certainly not for women or children.

Your hope and salvation can only come from God. He will put an end to this monstrous plot, as soon as it 1st becomes apparent so people can see the difference between God's way and man's way (as well as the Devil's).


State Sponsored Rape
Back to Top

From:   WWW.AMERICANFREEPRESS.NET   AFP ON THE "WAR ON TERROR"
MAY 27, 2013 • ISSUE 21 • AMERICAN FREE PRESS      pg 3
U.S. Allies in Syria a Barbarous Lot   
     By Ralph Forbes
• Syrian rebels supported by America accused of gang-raping female civilians, cannibalism

As Congress prepares to vote on whether the U.S. military and CIA should openly arm rebel fighters in Syria, Americans need to know the truth about the $1 billion in tax money the Obama administration has given to sadistic monsters in Syria who have brutally raped countless women and turned them into sex slaves, and mutilated and murdered many women.

On May 15, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee announced that it would vote on a proposal to start openly arming groups fighting the popular government of Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.

This comes even after the North African news service Magharebia—sponsored by the U.S. Africa Command—interviewed the head of the Tunisian League for Human Rights, Balkis Mechri-Allagui, about Syria, claiming that CIA- and Mossad-backed clerics have gone so far as to bless the rape of women and children who don't support rebels fighting the Syrian government.

Like the vast majority of Muslims, Mechri-Allagui is outraged by the so-called "sexual jihad" preached by fanatical perverts, such as the following so-called religious leaders who condone sexual attacks:

Take the case of Salafi Sheikh Yasir al-'Ajlawni, who issued a "fatwa" telling jihadists to "capture and have sex with" all non-Sunni women—especially Assad's own sect (the Alawites) and Christians. The U.S. mass media has censored the many reports of kidnappings and horrific gang-rapes of many Christian girls. After one kidnapping, eyewitnesses in the town of Aleppo reported that members of the so-called Free Syrian Army (FSA) raped girls, thinking it was "halal" or lawful because al-'Ajlawni called "infidel" women, melk al-yamin, or sex slaves, who are seen more as animals or possessions, than human.

>>The Bible forbid Israelites in military campaigns from having any sex at all, even sex with their wives, while on those military campaigns. It also clearly excluded rape in all instances of foreign captive women. But above, we see some phony Muslim Clerics, who as far as I know, are supposed to respect Moses and obey God and God' law, which means no rape in any instance, period! Many Muslims, as far as I know, also allow for "weekend marriage or even 24 hour marriages. This is not allowed in the Bible, either. Marriage is forever. Divorce after 24 hours or a weekend? No way!

But in the USA in WWII, Military law openly allowed prostitution in Hawaii and regulated it for the boys. Americans were quietly encouraged to let their daughters give the boys a last thrill in case they did not come back. We broke all God's laws for the sake of a war. A price far too high. We are not allowed to disregard God's law for any reason. We are to accept death rather than compromise. But American went nuts and church leaders said nothing or even went along with ignoring God's law.

Sex slaves are not allowed in God's law, either. Religious leaders have turned God's law upside down and dumped it all over the ground. You will see this again in the USA. I guarantee it! Even little girls will be fair game. You watch!<<

The FSA is one of the groups actively fighting the Syrian government. According to The New York Times, FSA has benefited from weapons funneled to them from the CIA via Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Another CIA-backed "chaplain," Saudi Muhammad al-Arifi, issued a blessing to jihadi fighters to engage in "intercourse marriage" with captive Syrian women that lasts for a few hours "in order to give each fighter a turn"—in other words, to gang-rape these poor women.

>>Oh, such nice guys, huh? And they are our supposed allies! What do you say to this, ladies? If we help sponsor this crap, then can you doubt how your own leaders feel about you and your rights and body?<<

It has been reported that rich sheiks from Saudi Arabia and Qatar buy young sex slaves from FSA fighters to use them for a few days or weeks. Then the girls are dumped alone in Jordan, or left to come back to their families, humiliated and abused.

>>Ah, the rich! Of course! Membership has its privileges, no? . . . unless you are a woman!<<

Sheikh Ishaq Huwaini preached infidel captives are ghanima, or the "spoils of war," to be distributed among fighters and taken to "the slave market," where slave girls and concubines are sold. "Go to the market and buy her, and she becomes like your legal mate—though without a contract, a guardian, or any of that stuff," Magharebia quoted him as saying. "In other words, when I want a sex slave, I go to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her."

>> Ladies, let me ask. How long do you think it will be before this happens over here in the USA on a grand scale? If we sanction it overseas, what will stop it from crossing the ocean to here? Nothing that I can see. Take it to the bank!<<

Syrians have been fleeing their homes, even on foot, to escape FSA terrorism. Thousands of Syrians fled to Jordan's Zataari refugee camp to escape the war. "Three girls in our camp were kidnapped," Israa Mohammed told Magharebia. "They raped them. Then they brought them back to the camp. . . . The Jordanian guys, they come to harass Syrian girls from the age of seven or six." >> Ah, there is that magic age 6 coming up again. Don't you get tired of it?<<

These monstrous war crimes were spawned by a CIA-sponsored version of "Islam" as part of Operation Cyclone, which began with $20-$30 million in 1980—rising to $630 million per year in 1987. Funding continued for the Afghan mujahideen through 1992.

Balkis Mechri-Allagui, a female, and the vice president of the Tunisian League for Human Rights, condemns the actions of Muslim clerics who have condoned war crimes against civilians in Syria.

>>Do governments believe they can fund these animals and have us take them seriously? Do you take your government  reps seriously? I surely hope not!<<

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2013 Jun 1. This just came out this last week.

Japan mayor mounts lengthy sex slave comment defence
By Shingo Ito | AFP – 12 hours ago
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/japan-mayor-mounts-lengthy-sex-slave-defence-113736255.html#0QFP0SU

The combative mayor of Osaka took on Japan's foreign press corps Monday in a nearly three-hour defence of his comments on wartime sex slaves.

>>Now who really cares what a Japanese Mayor said about anything. Yet all were happy to give him nearly 3 hours to listen to this non-sense. Would you do that?<<

Toru Hashimoto again insisted Japan's soldiers were not uniquely guilty in their widely-condemned "comfort women" system, claiming systemic trafficking for sexual purposes by armies around the world.

>>This is the absolute truth, but you won't see anyone except this mayor admit it. So he is more honest than they are. Maybe I will give him 3 hours.<<

Hashimoto drew ire earlier this month after suggesting the approximately 200,000 women from Korea, China, the Philippines and elsewhere who were forcibly drafted into brothels during World War II played a "necessary" role in maintaining discipline.

>> Oh, did you see that? forced prostitution was "necessary." One day soon, our nation will say that, too. I say its a bunch of lies. If we can not win a war without committing serious atrocities, then we have no business conducting war, period.<<

Under questioning from journalists at the Foreign Correspondents' Club in Tokyo, he stepped back from that assertion, but pressed his point that Japan was not alone.

"(Sexual violation) existed in the armed forces of the United States, Britain, France, Germany and the former Soviet Union among others during World War II," Hashimoto said.   >>Its a fact! A dirty little secret, a skeleton in the closet! The next line is a fact, too!<<

The abrasive mayor said many militaries worldwide relied on businessmen to operate wartime brothels where trafficked women were often forced to provide sex for their soldiers.  >>Its been going on for at least 6000 years, no doubt!<<

"I believe there were some forms of human trafficking at such local facilities operated by the private sector and used by the US and British militaries during World War II," Hashimoto said.     >> I believe it, too.<<

Hashimoto offered no proof of his assertions and there is no mainstream evidence that other modern militaries have employed a formal sex slavery system.

>>There is no evidence because the media never printed it. Many victims have told their stories but none would print it. We see this even with rapes in the USA military.<<

Like many on the right of Japanese politics, Hashimoto has questioned whether there was direct state or military involvement in the running of "comfort stations".

"From a historical viewpoint, it is unclear if Japan, as a national policy, carried out abduction or human trafficking," he said.

>> Here we have the mayor in denial or at least he says its unclear. What would clear it up and would anyone be willing to come forth at this point? We will never know because the media works for the governments, not us little people.<<

But, he added, it was immaterial and did not lessen the wrong.
"In terms of human traffic, there is no difference between facilities operated with the military involvement of Japan and similar facilities run by the private sector," he added. "Both were bad."

Newspaper polls have shown an overwhelming majority of the Japanese public thought Hashimoto's earlier comments on "comfort women" were "inappropriate".  
>>You mean its bad to tell the truth? Evidently!<<

The press conference was well-attended by foreign media, and also attracted a goodly share of Japanese journalists wanting to write stories on how news outlets abroad had covered Hashimoto's colorful sideshow of recent weeks.

The lawyer-turned-politician, who co-leads the national Japan Restoration Party, used the occasion to retract advice he gave to US military commanders in Japan urging them to allow their charges to use the country's licensed sex businesses.

He said his comments, which provoked scorn from the Pentagon, had been intended to help reduce crimes committed by service personnel in Okinawa, which has a large US military presence.

But, he accepted, they had been misjudged.  

>> The Foreign press were well represented at this. How come the interest? The mayor also revealed that he has offered the Pentagon licensed sex services for the US military, claiming they were not behaving so well. I have little doubt about that. Since we are raping our own women, is there any reason to doubt that we rape foreign women, too? I think not! Had he not let this out, we would not have known, nor do we know how interested or not the US military was. He let them off easy, assuring us they had been misjudged. I wonder about that.<<

"I retract my inappropriate remarks to the US Army and the American people and sincerely apologise to them," he said.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Japan mayor's sex slave remarks 'outrageous' – US
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22564349

>>Oh, the US feigns outrage, while funding rapists and sex traffickers overseas. Yeah, that sounds credible, huh?<<

The US has condemned recent remarks by Osaka Mayor Toru Hashimoto justifying Japan's war-time use of sex slaves as "outrageous and offensive".

A US state department spokesman said such women had been victims of a "grave human rights violation".

The Japanese government, which in 1993 issued a formal apology over the issue, has sought to distance itself from his remarks.

'Deplorable'

"Mayor Hashimoto's comments were outrageous and offensive," said state department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.

"What happened in that era to these women who were trafficked for sexual purposes is deplorable and clearly a grave human rights violation of enormous proportions," she said.

Mr Hashimoto, the co-founder of the nationalist Japanese Restoration Party, which has a small presence in parliament, said enforced prostitution had been necessary to keep troops in line.

"If you want them [troops fighting a war] to have a rest in such a situation, a comfort women system is necessary. Anyone can understand that."

>>Again, this is what they will say in America the next time, which is just around the corner. Wanna place a bet with me?<<

"Everybody was doing bad things. I think Japanese people... should offer objections if there is a misunderstanding of facts in the world."
>>Agreed! Lets squeal on them all and make them all account and not just Japan as an escape goat.<<

Both South Korea and China have condemned Mr Hashimoto's remarks, which come at a time when historical issues and territorial rows have elevated tensions in the region.
>> Look who is calling the kettle black? China, king of the slave drivers that cause many Chinese young to kill themselves? The same ones that have been alleged to sell body parts from prisoners? The ones who pollute their nation and poison their people and land? Wow, we sure know how to establish credibility, huh? You're not buying it, are you?

Now myself, I have to wonder about all these nations that express outrage, when so many of their own actions have many atrocities to answer for. But in politics, the winners are also the judges and only the losers can be judged. More credibility, you understand. 

But I say this! Why did many nations' reporters sit for 3 hours to listen to a lowly mayor speak at length about rape being a necessary part of war. They pretended to be offended  . . . for 3 hours, sitting quietly. I dare say, they would never do that for Hitler, or maybe I would be surprised there, too. Could it be that they chose a lowly mayor who did not have that much to loose and the Japanese also pretended to be offended by the mayor.

But offended or not, the message got out and got good publicity, which may have been the goal all along. They pretend offense but they wanted you to hear and consider this "new" idea. Not because it is new, but because it has always been a dirty little secret and now they want to come out in the open about it. they even want to make it look good or justified at the least. I think that is what is behind it.

But I offer this. God forbid Israelite soldiers from any sexual activity while fighting a military campaign. Not even with your wife. Certainly not rape, which was never allowed in any circumstance. War can be done without rape or sex. But really, prostitution is preferable to forcing your own into sex. But let us not kid ourselves, either. Many prostitutes will be forced ones, not willing. It is really just another form of rape. But after a few dozen guys, most women just give up and take it. They can not be blamed for that. Buy many willing (often out of desperation) prostitutes have to do serious drugs in order to live with what they do.

But many might except what the Japanese did, in conscripting conquered women into forced prostitution rather than using their own to service the soldiers. Many governments want us to accept enemy prostitution in exchange for relieving our own of their "duties" to their comrades. Listen, so many games are played with us all the time by people at the top. We never fully know what they are up to. They are always scheming. 

Ah, but I save the best for last!<<


Rape victim: Retaliation prevalent in military
Back to Top

Associated PressBy JULIE WATSON | Associated Press – 4 hrs ago       May 31, 2013 - 4 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/rape-victim-retaliation-prevalent-military-021740188.html

 SAN DIEGO (AP) — Stacey Thompson had just been stationed at a Marine base in Japan when she said her sergeant laced her drinks with drugs, raped her in his barracks and then dumped her onto a street outside a nightclub at 4 a.m.

The 19-year-old lance corporal was not afraid to speak up.

She reported it to her superiors but little happened. She said she discovered her perpetrator was allowed to leave the Marine Corps and she found herself, instead, at the center of a separate investigation for drug use stemming from that night. Six months later, she was kicked out with an other-than-honorable discharge — one step below honorable discharge — which means she lost her benefits.

<<< Stacy provided this picture to AP. This was Stacy, likely at a time before her rape. Happy, optimistic, innocent, trusting her nation and its military. A pretty girl, too. And who raped her? Her sargeant! Her superior!<<

Now, 14 years later, she has decided to speak out again, emboldened by the mounting pressure on the Pentagon to resolve its growing sexual assault epidemic.

She went public with her story Thursday in an exclusive interview with The Associated Press. She is among the scores of service members who have lived in silence for decades and are now stepping forward to fight for an overhaul of the military's justice system and demand their own cases be re-examined.

>> Now let me ask here. Did the Marine Corp act lie they were trying to carry out justice? Not hardly! They not only suppressed the crime, but let the guy get away with it. And then they punished her for objecting. This is a deliberate policy to break the will of women and make them put up with it. As it was, Stacy gave up and went quiet for 14 years. What else could she do? Her country screwed her!<<

"To see that what happened to me 14 years ago is still continuing to happen now, for me that was a big reason why I felt the need to come forward," she said. "I can finally say I have the strength."

Marine Corps and Navy officials declined to comment, saying they do not discuss specific cases. The Marine Corps has said it takes sexual assault allegations seriously and continues to improve in responding to and preventing rapes within the ranks. All branches have been implementing sexual assault prevention programs in the past year.

Retaliation is part of a military-wide pattern that has prevented countless cases from being reported and investigated, exacerbating the epidemic, according to victims' advocates. A Pentagon report released earlier this month found 62 percent of sexual assault victims in the military who reported being attacked say they faced some kind of retaliation afterward.

"It's an ongoing problem that is not getting better, it's getting worse, as the latest statistics out of the Pentagon show," said Brian Purchia, spokesman for Protect Our Defenders, which has been helping Thompson. "Unfortunately commanders are conflicted: When a sexual assault occurs on their watch, it reflects poorly on them and that's why it's shoved under the rug. The perpetrators frequently out rank the victims, which is also why there is this bias. They're going to trust people they've known — not an 18 or 19-year-old just new to the service."  

>> Now look at the lines I have bold-faced in the 4 paragraphs just above. Its still happening, its gotten worse, victims get punished for telling or complaining. Many more likely do not complain, only because they need the job and benefits from the Military. And they see what has been done to those who do, and so they see no hope or point to speaking out.

But the Military declined comment or says its getting better, when statistics say its getting worse. So we can assume they are liars. They says some commanders are conflicted? The real problem is, that is it often those commanders that are the worst rapists or cover for other rapists and the Military, right up to the very top, protects the offenders and creates stupid procedures that make sure conviction will be nearly impossible. Wake up and see the handwriting on the wall, will you! Rape is stand military procedure, plain and simple. Ladies, stay out of the military unless you want to be prostitutes. How much do they have to abuse you before you catch on?<<

Thompson said military culture will not change until the system changes. She will speak Friday at a news conference in Los Angeles with Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., to show her support for her bipartisan bill that would put the cases in the hands of military trained prosecutors.  

>>Stacy Thompson, who has such faith and trust in her nation, even yet, does not understand that there is no real desire to fix this problem. They can get special prosecutors or ever turn it over to the civilian courts. Civilian courts let rapists off just like Military ones do. This problem reflects the attitude and desire of those who lead over us. They want women to give their bodies, without any reserve, to reward soldiers who are willing to risk injury, deformity, and death to do what ever atrocities their leaders ask of them. Its been a 6000 year policy in most periods of history.

As war get more indifferent and immoral, men will have less and less conscience as they go about their assigned or ordered "business." They do not want any woman refusing them or giving them any crap. Either do it willingly, or we will make you do so, is and will be their attitude. Women are just things to give pleasure, without the men having to give anything back. Not even a thank you. Sex will be their right and due! Welcome to the brave new world!<<

Service members now must report any crimes to the chain of command, even when their superiors have been involved. >>Now how fair is that? Its not. Its not intended to be fair. You ladies had better get with the program, or else!!!<<

"Too many survivors of military sexual assault are afraid to report these crimes because they fear retaliation, and they don't believe they will get justice," Boxer said. "They deserve a system that encourages victims to come forward knowing that the perpetrators will be brought to justice."

>> Oh, listen, it takes a hell of a lot more than "encouragement." On the battlefield, one who deserts or tries to flee, can be shot on sight/site. There are good reasons for that. When men desert the battle line, they endanger the whole army on the field. Treason is also punished by death. Any solider who commits rape, commits the ultimate treason by attacking their own comrades. Immediate execution is the only solution to this problem. Rape is very enticing for men without conscience, but not so much that they will risk death too many times before they decide they can more easily rape the enemy's women instead.

War time rape of the enemy's civilian women has been the most testified and well known behavior in all history. USA Unions soldiers raped many  Southern bell, including some of the rather young. No one can claim innocence on this one. US forces raped many a French girl in WWII, and German, too. My father was there in Austria in the cold war in 51-53 and knows what he was told and even stopped one from being carried out.

But when you can justify any rape, you can pretty much justify all rape. If we can look the other way while young girls are forced into sex traffucking, and forced prostitution is continual rape, then we are all guilty in some measure for it getting out of hand. To stop military rape, we must stop all rape and fix the attitudes that go with that.<<

Thompson said she was not afraid to report the crime but paid heavily for doing so. >> She did not know what the consequences were going to be.  She had no idea there would be any consequences. She trusted in her government and its military. Big mistake, says I.<<

The investigator called her a liar, and military authorities checked her hands for needle pricks after accusing her of using drugs. She said she never used drugs. She was reassigned to another unit, removed from her job and told to report to an office, where she had nothing to do for months.

Then she was kicked out. She continues to suffer from her other-than-honorable discharge, which stripped her of her benefits and she believes has led to her missing out on Defense Department jobs.  

END of articles<<<     and back to me only in plain black text.

Now honestly, those tactics are not the tactics of sincere investigators and prosecutors. Those are the tactics of total bullies and thugs, a crime syndicate does things like that. Picture this with a Mobster accent: "Hey, you don't life servicing the soldiers, then see  how you like this. Now you are a drug addict and dishonorably discharged. Still like being a whistle blower?"

What it comes down to, is that women, children, slaves, and laborers, who are also just slaves, and the poor, have no recourse, rights, or respect. They are trampled under foot and treated as dirt. This was done openly in Rome, but we of the latest centuries have become much better liars, putting on the pretense of justice and caring, when in reality, we do nothing of the sort. We are as bad, if not worse, in our practices. to openly practice deceit is much worse.

If you openly declare you are brutal and nasty, at least no one should be surprised when you live up to that. but what you claim you are angels from heaven and act like devils, then it is being attacked by surprise, what we sometimes call "Pearl Harbored." That was an attack without a formal declaration of war. Tell it like it is! We lie and misrepresent what we are doing, so that the masses will not get upset. That is pure treachery and treason. Conspiracy!

We must change our attitudes toward abusing those without power or protection, no matter who they are. Justice is the most important and fundamental process that exists in life. To slight it in any way is to slice your own throat. Justice is the most important function of any government, at any and all times. No excuses!

But today, Justice is just a joke, and I am not laughing. The only thing raped more than women is justice. All 300 million of us gang bang that bitch daily. She gets no rest or relief. Either we can start caring about justice at all levels, or I can absolutely promise you the end of your world and civilization. It won't be me that backs that guarantee, it will be God. I can predict, but God will deliver.

If it comes true, than I look like I knew what I was talking about, but God enlightened me on the matter, indirectly. I do not have any ability to talk or converse with God and He has not bothered to talk or speak, except through the Bible. He has, however, enabled my brain to see through this mess. So I speak so as to warn. My hands are now free from blood.

Soon, society will be transformed, brought about by contrived phony "natural" disasters, depression and economic collapse, WWIII (WW3 if you prefer), starvation, etc. Such a tremendous culmination of all these brought together at near to the same time, with just one promise (a fake one, naturally) of how to get out of it, will lead us right into the largest massive world-wide killing the world has ever seen. On a scale never seen before or that will ever be seen again. One for the ages to remember for all time.

And why? Because we did not care about the rights and justice for the poor powerless vulnerable people of the world. Carve this in stone. You will see it happen!!!

----------------------------------------

JUNE 10 & 17, 2013 • ISSUE 23/24    pg. 2       WWW.AMERICANFREEPRESS.NET

What a Waste

In 2010, American taxpayers paid the U.S. military to train soldiers in the Congo in order to turn them into "a model for future reforms within the Con­golese armed forces." The program was short lived, however. According to reports, a year after the training, Congolese soldiers from the 391st Battalion reverted back to the law of the jungle and went on a rampage, raping 97 women and 33 girls, some allegedly as young as 6 years old.
End of News Item<<<

Well, we had Syrian "rebels" going on a rape spree and now Congo, too, all funded by the USA. What do these both have in common? Rape and USA sponsorship. See any possibilities? Patterns? And we have typical military cover-up of rapes in the military in the USA. So this brave new world! Is that what it is or promises to be, where women are just here for the men to use at will. Is this that advanced evolutionary development we here about? We have come such along way from those primitive societies, they tell us. I am not sure who is really more primitive. But I know God detests women being used against their will. And He will certainly avenge women and His own will in not too much more time.


Combat Missions for Women
Back to Top

‘No girls allowed’: Iraq war vet Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on opening combat missions to women
By Rick Klein, Richard Coolidge, and Jordyn Phelps | Power Players – July 4 2013
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/no-girls-allowed-iraq-war-vet-rep-tulsi-112535721.html?vp=1

Ask Rep. Tulsi Gabbard why she supports the military’s new policy to allow women to serve in combat roles, and the Iraq war veteran speaks from experience.

“I can tell you during my deployment, there were missions that I-- volunteered for and was not allowed to go on, simply because I'm a woman,” Gabbard, D-Hawaii, tells Top Line. “They said, ‘Sorry, no. No girls allowed.’”

Gabbard served in Iraq and says the military’s policy shift is much more than symbolic.

“What we see in the policy change now…is just a reflection of what women have already been doing in the military,” she says. “And it'll now open those doors so that we can have women serving in positions of leadership and within units where previously they were not allowed.”

>> AS one who was in the military and Iraq, and now serving in the US Congress, and knowing about the rape scandals of the military, Gabbard ought to know better and think better. But she no doubt has been tapped to serve as the perfect opinion that it should be OK for women to be in combat. Problem is, that once they are allowed into combat, they will be forced into it in not much more time. It will not be just optional for very long. When has our government ever not tried to get their foot in the door and move boundaries around?

You know what I have predicted in this article, that women will be forced into sexual service by the military. Well, getting them into combat is the 1st step, but not the last. Once in combat, then it will be mandatory for all women. Once that is in place, they can offer women an "alternative service" if they want to avoid combat. Sexual service of the "boys." Note what Gabby has to say next.<<

Gabbard also brings a first-hand perspective to the issue of sexual assault in the military, saying she “heard and saw incidents” of sexual assault within her military camp when she was in Iraq.

“We got issued rape whistles so that as we walk out of our tent or walk out of our hooch, we've got our body armor, we've got our helmet, our weapon, and we've got our rape whistle,” Gabbard recalls. “It was an eye-opening experience to have to consider that fact when we're serving overseas in Iraq and…this is a risk or a danger that exists.”
        End of Article<<<

>> You got to be kidding me! A rape whistle? A whistle clearly reveal that they know the danger and yet do not fix the danger. Women have more to fear from their own comrades than they do the enemy. Is that what you can sane? Now how hard would it be for a forceful violent soldier to knock that whistle out of her mouth, pull it out, or sneak up from behind so they can not get the whistle in their mouths in the 1st place?

I am going back to black text now.<<

And if you are raped in your superior's office? No one will hear you scream, anyway. Honestly, this goes way beyond shameful. It is of the worst of atrocities. Women attacked by their own comrades! That is far more than rape. It is treachery and treason and should be punished by execution. It continues and gets worse because there is no real enforcement and never will be.

For Gabbard to even recommend women serving says to me we all long ago forgot what WACs were created in WWII and sent over seas. Those women did not "serve" in a military capacity, even though they wore a military sort of looking uniform. To recommend combat for women is the last step in depravity. Soldiers in all militaries often resort to rape of civilians in war. They are often alone and on the move and can get away with it. And we want to put our girls into that situation? If so, then we have all become rapists and we have no morals left.

And since I have already predicted the prostitution of women soldiers, sending them off to combat will be the final move before they offer the women an "alternate" choice of service. Many will take it, too. They are likely to be raped, anyway, so why not get out of combat and yet get combat pay?

Gabbard is irresponsible and selling out her own sisters on this one. I, for one, consider all government reps to be paid whores, anyway, men as well as women. But now we can add treason to the list. If Gabby was in Iraq, then she knows only too well the real and serious danger that no whistle is going to stop. Hell and high water will not stop it, either. I am so disgusted with the direction this is all taking.

I know most of you idiots out there do not think what I have predicted will happen. But of course, in war, you will not hear anything anyway, when it does happen.  The devil will get his way and turn all our values and morals upside down. And most of the world will go along with it. Which is why most of the world will be allowed to die. Most will not be worth saving in God's eye  . . . or mine, for that matter.

But know this and carve it in stone. Women will serve in combat and eventually be forced to serve in it. Equal rights, you know. That will enable the final solution. All women will serve their comrades or die in combat, if they do not also get raped there, too. The threat of the enemy will pale in comparison. And the very worst for all of you will be the fact that you will have to call me a prophet then ;-) Or Psychic! I would prefer prophet as Psychic suggests witchcraft and Satanism. Keep in touch. I'll be waiting ;-)

-------------------------------------

Aug 11, 2013            Near to 2 weeks or so ago, I saw somewhere on the net that the military was saying that if women were made equal by being allowed (and later forced, says I) into combat, then the rapes would stop, since the soldiers would respect them more. This is the biggest bunch lies and nonsense! Some Soldiers, male ones, do not respect women, period. You mean that because women do not serve in combat situations, that this is a good excuse to rape them? Are you kidding me? Who would say such nonsense? Military big wigs, that is who!

There is absolutely no good excuse for rape, ever. But now military big wigs are doing just that, making excuses and justifying rape. I think I know some big wigs who ought to be immediately court martialed and thrown out of the military and lose all their pensions and benefits. Women will still not be respected, even if they had more kills than men in combat. There has always been a disregard, disrespect, and even contempt and hatred for women among too many men. Our civilian legal system makes a mockery of rape and prosecuting rape is a joke. Men sometimes get more "time" for exposing themselves then they do for rape.

As you know, if you have read all this section above, the last step that will enable forced sexual servitude of female soldiers will be when they are forced into combat positions. In exchange for being relieved of combat duties, they will be offered jobs as sexual service workers, "caring" for their male comrades and stimulating their morale, as well as a few other things. And if they remain in combat positions, they may still end up "relieving the pressure and stress" from their male counter parts and maybe even their own as well.

Combat does very strange things to soldiers, whether male or female. WWII left many solider a complete mess when they came back. Any war tends to do this. Man was not meant be a warrior. It is not healthy for him or anyone. But those in power need warriors and enforcers in order to take over the world and keep that power and control over the world. so we fight and we die, or we get very damaged in the head, PTSD, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

So you are seeing my prophecy come true. They are begging to "allow" women into combat roles and pay. After being allowed, it won't be too much more time before women will be forced to go into combat.

Most of the 20th century was spent trying to transform our attitudes toward sex, making us exhibitionists, and embracing open free sexuality. The roaring 20s was the big start of this in civilian life. But in the 21st century, they have been grooming very young girls to be exhibitionists, show-offs, and their mothers love it, living vicariously through their daughters. Sex is pretty much a wide open affair now.

The only real obstacle left is to get women and girls, yes, girls, too, to not be picky or fussy and be generous and do it with whoever whenever. It is possible that just as there are social class levels in wealth and lifestyle, it may be that class levels will form in sex, too. The attractive people will group together and the plain ones will hang together and the ugly will have to settle for each other. but in the army, they may encourage "generosity" from females. We will know when it happens.

But our society will be transformed, to where women will be expected and forced into a new lifestyle, where sex will be obligatory and mandatory. As I have shown elsewhere in this article, societies have done this before in history.

All that will be needed to get this ball rolling, is to get women into combat and that is being argued for now. Take good notice of it. You are just about there. We do not care about women, or children, or animals. I recall this scripture from Genesis, where woman (Eve) was told what fate awaited future females. I am quoting the Geneva Bible since it does the best job of translating this particular passage. Many seem to get it wrong.

Genesis 3:
13   And the Lord God said to the woman, Why hast thou done this? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

16   Unto the woman he said, I will greatly increase your sorrows, and your conceptions. In sorrow shall you bring forth children, and your desire shall be subject to your husband, and he shall rule over you.

But when God says “rule over you,” He does not mean that in a good way. You can tell because it is in sorrow (sadness and depression) that woman conceives and gives birth, and raises kids. Men are not the good nurturing souls who care about those in their charge. To them, women are just play things, not to be regarded otherwise. Children mean nothing or end up also as play things. They are also handy to take out anger and frustration on, since they can not fight back. Animals will have it no better.

The odd thing is, no ones sees this coming, especially women. But whether you want to or not, the devil is going to bring this about and he will have lots of help down here on earth.

Keep your eyes on that expanding combat role!  

---------------------------------------

Sep. 30, 2013        Now get a load of this one! Its from the Personal Liberty Digest site. What I want to draw attention to, is 1st, the absurdity of the rationale of Islamic leaders and their followers. They can justify just about anything and they do. This was the problem Jesus found with the Pharisees primarily, as well as Sadducees and High Priests at times, too. They twist law and interpret it underhandedly so as to allow what is not really allowed under the law of God. All corrupt religions do this. So called Christians have many escape clauses that violate the principles of God. Like fighting wars for your country, rather than beating your swords into plowshares and spears into pruning hooks. All the nations belong to the devil yet Christians insist on fighting for their countries of habitation, preferring the devil over God.

So now lets look at a new twist on the subject of RAPING for God or Allah. Yes, some Islamic leaders say that in special cases, its good to rape. See for yourself. I'll comment in red-brown letters and >>these<< brackets. 

Sexual Jihad And Spreading Crabs In The Name Of Muhammad
August 28, 2013 by Sam Rolley
http://personalliberty.com/2013/08/28/sexual-jihad-and-spreading-crabs-in-the-name-of-muhammad/

In Islamic law, fatwa is a legal opinion or decree handed down by an Islamic religious leader known as mufti. While the dictates issued in a particular fatwa are not necessarily binding, extremists have been known to act on the orders, often with devastating results.

One of the most infamous and widely-known fatwas was issued in 1989 when a novel penned by British Indian novelist and essayist Salman Rushdie irritated Iran’s then-supreme leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.  More than two decades later, The Satanic Verses author still lives with the threat that “good Muslims” on a mission to assassinate him could show up at any time.

In the Middle East, fatwas abound, but are often so absurd that they get little attention from Western media. But, with heightened interest in the current struggle between Muslim fundamentalist rebels in the Free Syrian Army and that nation’s lawful government— and the looming prospect of U.S. intervention on the rebels’ behalf— it is worth taking a look at some recent Islamic fatwas.

In June, while the Muslim Brotherhood shill Mohamed Morsi was still in control of Egypt, the country’s fatwa council issued a directive banning Muslims from hunting and killing frogs to sell.

According to Jihad Watch, “the fatwa explains, according to Islam’s prophet Muhammad as recorded in a hadith, a frog’s ‘croaking is praise [to Allah].’ Accordingly, ‘a number of jurists [fuqaha] have relied on this [hadith] to forbid the eating of frogs, under the notion that “that which is banned from being killed, is forbidden from being eaten.”’”

Other animal-related fatwas in the past have ordered radical Muslims to kill Mickey Mouse and to kill all black dogs, among some animal rights decrees.

Later in June, a fatwa was issued in the Syrian city of Aleppo to punish people who dare to eat croissants.

>> The real danger here is that if their reasoning is so easily corrupt or just void of good sense, can it really be any good or trustworthy? What is the motive? Peter said that there are those who twist scriptures to their own destruction. They would not do so if they really loved God and obeyed Him. You have been warned! <<

From a previous Personal Liberty post:

According to an interview at China’s English-language Sina news website, one man who’s frustrated with the growing post-revolutionary power of Islamist extremists in Syria explains how fundamentalists are tightening their grip on local rule to an absurd extent.

“Al-Nusra Front fighters come up every day with a new unimaginable fatwa, or religious edict,” such as the fatwa against croissants, said the Syrian, identified only as “Ahmed.” The fundamentalists claim croissants are particularly relished by European infidels as a celebratory food (because of their “symbolic” crescent shape), which they allegedly tear into with gusto to commemorate historic victories over the Muslims.

Syrians originally inspired by a revolution they hoped would ensure stability and expanded freedoms are now taking to the internet to criticize al-Nusra’s growing intolerance of behaviors that fall outside various factions’ interpretations of sharia law. Other recent fatwas have involved women drivers, unveiled young girls, smoking and even listening to music.

Two—dare I note, unfortunately timed—fatwas surfaced in media more recently.

According to Ahlulbayt News, an English-language Shia Islamic television channel, the Free Syrian Army issued a fatwa prohibiting the killing of lice in the Muslim beard or else “be punished with 50 lashes by Sharia.”

A translation of the order from the Sharia Authority in Aleppo explains:

The Sharia Authority in Aleppo has prohibited the killing of lice that appears in the Muslim beard, as some of the Muslim brothers who have released [grown] their beards in accordance with prophet Muhammad PBuH Sunnah [prophet's doctrine], blessed lice has appeared in their beards, and that’s because of their lack of bathing due to the water non-availability all the time on the Jihad [holy war] fronts, and they have limited to ablution before their prayers (may God accept it), thus their beards became moist and thick, which made of it (in God’s will) a natural place for lice to live in.

The Sharia Authority in Aleppo recommends the Mujahideen [holy fighters] brothers to dye their beards with Henna, like our prophet Muhammad PBuH, the thing that would reduce the itching caused by the lice, and to maintain this lice that would have not appeared in those blessed beards, if it was not from God’s Muslim believing creatures.

>>This is the real important one, on the subject we have been discussing in regards to USA military rapes.<<

If the jihadists are to run around and be mercilessly shelled by the Syrian government all while having itchy beards, at least their sexual appetites will be satiated long before they reach Muhammad and all of those celestial virgins. That is thanks to a separate fatwa becoming popular in some Middle Eastern regions which calls on the widows of al-Qaida commanders and fighters to join the effort through “Sexual Jihad.”

The Assyrian International News Agency reported late last month:

Reports attribute the fatwa to Saudi sheikh Muhammad al-’Arifi, who, along with other Muslim clerics earlier permitted jihadis to rape Syrian women.

Muslim women prostituting themselves in this case is being considered a legitimate jihad because such women are making sacrifices–their chastity, their dignity–in order to help apparently sexually-frustrated jihadis better focus on the war to empower Islam in Syria…

… On the basis of this fatwa, several young Tunisian Muslim girls traveled to Syria to be “sex-jihadis.” Video interviews of distraught parents bemoaning their daughters’ fates are on the Internet, including one of a father and mother holding a picture of their daughter: “She’s only 16–she’s only 16! They brainwashed her!” pleads the father…

..While all these sex-fatwas may seem bizarre, they highlight two important (though little known in the West) points. First, that jihad is the “pinnacle” of Islam–for it makes Islam supreme; and second, the idea that “necessity makes permissible the prohibited.”

>> “necessity makes permissible the prohibited” is better known to us as  "the ends justifies the means." Both are wrong, of course. Rape is not OK, just because it will help you win. Same for prostitution or any other sin. What should be obvious is that these false shepherds of Islam have no use for God or righteous principles. Also note that several young women happily went along with serving soldiers. Not all will mind the job at all. But if the USA is the Christians nation that many so called Christians say it is, then serving soliders sex is nothing but prostitution, which is absolutely forbidden in the Bible, and in fact, on a military campaign, no sex at all is allowed in the law of Moses.

It may start with Islam, but I boldly assert that it will make its way to the USA. Really, it already has. I believe military rape was/is an attempt to conditions females to take it and not complain. You'll see!<<

And the sex jihad is becoming increasingly popular throughout the Middle Eastern region, which is indicative of a big problem for the U.S. (a problem that has been evident to those paying attention for years) if the President decides to entangle the country in another war to help Syria’s rebels: al Qaida and various other groups of Muslim extremists are running the show in any area that the Western powers help to destabilize.

>> Yes, sexual jihads are no doubt very popular. Listen, in any war, there are no innocent sides. Both sides rape. And if it is deemed advantageous, both sides of any war from here on in, are apt to consider getting women to willing "serve" soldiers for Morale's sake. We all looked the other way during WWII, as prostitution was winked at and average girls were encouraged to give the boys a happy send off by allowing them to have sex with the young women.

With women in the military being raped by their own in the USA, you can bet if they serve in combat, the enemy will also enjoy certain prerogatives, if USA female soldiers are captured. I personally believe that women who have been captured already in past conflicts were raped, and convinced to not come forth about it.<<

Via Alsumaria, an independent Iraqi Satellite TV Network:

A local official in Diyala province revealed that Al Qaeda Organization has asked the widows of its commanders and fighters to abide by “Sexual Jihad Fatwa” as a means of support to its guerillas; considering that such a Fatwa is transnational.

>> It always starts out as temporary, a means of transition, they say. But when Rosie the Riviter finished her job in was factories, she did not want to go back to the former life style. Sheh liked her financial independence (rightly so) and her sexual freedom as well. Marriage was not always desirable, at least until they lost their beauty and appeal, and we all lose it sooner or later. The genie never goes back into the bottle once its out. Once we got sexual liberation, we never went back in this country, the USA.

Once women serve the male soldiers as sexual relief and as a morale booster, it will never end. In order to keep the military running well, women will be relegated to that role forever more. Is that really what you all want to do? Do you still think you're Christians?<<

“Intelligence cells commissioned with monitoring Al Qaeda’s activities within Diyala’s borders have reported that the highly-ranked officials in the organization urged the widows of the commanders and members to abide by the sexual Jihad Fatwa. This Fatwa allows Al Qaeda’s women to have sexual intercourse with members of the organization to lift their morale”, said Al Khalis district’s administrative official, Oday Al Khadran in a statement to Alsumaria.

>> Don't laugh! We will be saying the very same thing. Care to place a bet or two?<<

“The attempt to implement the Sexual Jihad Fatwa issued by clergymen that support the armed groups in Syria proves that such laws are transnational. This also points out that Al Qaeda’s course of action in Syria or in any other country is closely related to the events that are taking place in Iraq”, he added.

The President of the United States will to contend that the Nation is on some great humanitarian mission when it becomes clear that a Syrian war (to, no doubt, be followed by an Iranian conflict) is imminent— but it certainly will be a lie. In reality, the U.S. will jump headfirst into a holy war in support of the very jihadists who, we are to believe, attempted to bring us to our knees just under a decade and a half ago.

>> To clarify, the USA allies with Al Qaeda, who is behind this sexual madness. Al Qaeda is in opposition to Syria and Iran. So we will be joining rapists as allies. How's that for a cause? And as far as I am concerned, the USA will join the the various sexual jihad tactics as well. Yet, many so called Christians insist we are a Christian nation. What a joke. This is evidence that we are a nation under the devil, not God. But the USA is not apt to publicly admit what it is doing when it finally does it. That will only be revealed after the war is over. That is my guess.<<

Do you want your tax dollars used in aid of people taking orders from men who advocate such barbarism as forced copulation and the proliferation of pubic lice?

#END OF ARTICLE Citation


Military Rapes Escalate                Dec. 28, 2013
Back to Top

Below just came out today.

Reports of sexual assaults in military on rise    AP - LOLITA C. BALDOR - 5 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Heightened attention to the crime of sexual assault in the U.S. military may be causing more people to come forward and report problems. Defense officials cite the increased awareness as a possible reason the number of reported sexual assaults rose by more than 50 percent this year.

>>Just think! 50% now reporting, had not previously been reporting. They had been "taking it," whether out of fear, intimidation, or whatever. In other words, maybe the military tactics of bully women into sexual submission had been working pretty good. On the sad side, women felt helpless and did not know where to turn.<<

More than 5,000 reports of sexual assault were filed during the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, compared to the 3,374 in 2012, according to early data obtained by The Associated Press. About 10 percent of the 2013 reports involved incidents that occurred before the victim got into the military, up from just 4 percent only a year ago.

That increase, officials said, suggests that confidence in the system is growing and that victims are more willing to come forward. While cautious in their conclusions, officials said surveys, focus groups and repeated meetings with service members throughout the year suggest that the number of actual incidents — from unwanted sexual contact and harassment to violent assaults — remained largely steady.

A string of high-profile assaults and arrests triggered outrage in Congress and set off months of debate over how to change the military justice system. Military leaders launched a series of programs intended to beef up accountability and encourage victims to report crimes.

>> It seemed more like lip service to me. I did not think they were getting anywhere near tough enough.<<

"Given the multiple data points, we assess that this is more reporting," said Col. Alan R. Metzler, deputy director of the Pentagon's sexual assault prevention and response office. He also noted that more victims are agreeing to make official complaints, rather than simply seeking medical care without filing formal accusations.

The military has long struggled to get victims to report sexual harassment and assault in a stern military culture that emphasizes rank, loyalty and toughness. Too often, victims have complained that they were afraid to report assaults to ranking officers, or that their initial complaints were rebuffed or ignored.

As a result, the crime has been vastly underreported — a fact that became evident when officials announced earlier this year that an anonymous survey had revealed that about 26,000 service members reported some type of unwanted sexual contact or sexual assault.

According to the latest numbers, the increase in reports across the services ranges from a low of about 45 percent for the Air Force to a high of 86 percent for the Marines, the smallest service. The Navy had an increase of 46 percent and the Army, by far the largest military service, had a 50 percent jump.

Jill Loftus, director of the Navy's sexual assault program, which also includes the Marine Corps, said the increase in reporting also suggests that more service members are starting to understand what types of behavior constitute harassment or assault.

She said that based on Navy surveys, "we are not seeing a perception that the number of incidents are going up."

"More likely, we have people who understand what sexual assault is," she said. And, she said, officials are hearing that more people are comfortable coming forward.

Meanwhile, a myriad of sexual assault arrests and scandals, including an Air Force commander's decision to dismiss sex assault charges against another officer who had been convicted of multiple offenses, got the attention of Congress. And it all led to a series of often emotional public hearings in which victims described their experiences.

Several of the new programs were aimed at encouraging service members to be more vigilant, and to look out for each other and intercede if they saw a bad situation developing. There also were moves to restrict alcohol sales, since drinking has long been associated with sexual assault and harassment.

By year's end, after lengthy negotiations between Capitol Hill and the Pentagon, lawmakers passed legislation that beefs up legal rights for victims and strips military commanders of their ability to overturn jury convictions. It also requires a civilian review if a commander declines to prosecute a case and requires that any individual convicted of sexual assault face a dishonorable discharge or dismissal.

Defense officials beat back efforts to more drastically revamp the military justice system that would take authority away from commanders and allow victims of rape and sexual assault to go outside the chain of command for prosecutions.

Still, military leaders acknowledge a lot of work remains to be done.

Metzler said the goal for this year is to continue efforts to increase reporting while also working more directly to reduce the survey number of 26,000 sexual harassment and assault victims.

Already, the military services are exchanging information on prevention programs that seem to be working.

>> Well, yes, they are working some now, because they are not just routinely covering it over and ignoring it, like they had been. In other words, this could have all been easily prevented. So why wasn't it? I propose, that they were trying to subjugate female recruits into sexual "service" by silently implying that it was not so bad and that they should just shrug it off and forget about it. No big deal. Its very scary to even contemplate how little regard they had for women. <<

Air Force officials, for example, visited a Navy pilot program at Naval Station Great Lakes in Illinois that worked with local hotels and bars to try to crack down on drinking by sailors from the naval station there. In the program, sailors are being taught to intervene when they see mates in trouble or engaging in bad behavior.

Loftus said the goal this year will be to improve the training so that sailors will actually have to act out scenarios in order to help them figure out when it's best to intervene and to ensure they have some type of plan before jumping into a situation.

Other programs that are being used more broadly include moves to cut hours of alcohol sales and the use of roving patrols of service members looking out for troops in trouble. She also said that some commanders are making their courts martial more public, publicizing the punishments for crimes, including sexual assault, and even holding cases on their parade fields, where all can watch.

"We're still not where we want things to be," said Metzler. "But we think all of this is having an effect."

>> I must admit that some of these steps do give signs of hope. But I wonder about where recruits might have gotten their attitudes about how to treat women. Did they get subtle (or not so subtle) impressions from the armed services, or is this a bad trend that is happening throughout our society? I wonder. Blaming alcohol does seem a little silly. Want an alibi? Get drunk first and blame the booze. But involving hotels, bars, and other recruits are very positive things. All society needs to take a 2nd look and rethink all that is going on. Have we all turned a blind eye to women being pursued and bullied into sexual submission? Its worth asking and worth changing, if it is so, and I think it is.

But even if this should vastly improve, we still have to answer why we let it get so far out of control and why it took so long. What was really going on? How do we really feel about women, and children, who are in need of even greater protection in those vulnerable years? Has our society got so used to picking on the "little" people, the weaker classes, and more vulnerable and defenseless?

Have not our employment practices raged out of control? Predatory business practices? We have become a very abusive bulllying society. That is what this entire article is about, from start to finish. Could what we see in the military be a reflection of our wider indifference to all those who are vulnerable to numerous forms of bullying. I do believe that school bullying is where the greatest danger signals are manifesting themselves.

Our kids are out of control and fierce, predatory, and not an ounce of remorse or compassion. My suggestion, based on the Bible, is that we are heading toward an emotional and societal apocalypse, of our own creation, or out of our own indifference. We can not afford to continue in indifference. That is, unless you think the world ending is not such a bad thing. Ignore it all at your own peril.

I supply a few comments from this article next:<<

DAWG 34 minutes ago 
"Loftus said the goal this year will be to improve the training so that sailors will actually have to act out scenarios in order to help them figure out when it's best to intervene and to ensure they have some type of plan before jumping into a situation."

THIS program has been in effect for years now and it is obviously NOT WORKING !!! The ONLY way to stop all of this from happening is to GET WOMEN OUT OF FRONT LINE MILITARY !!! First of all, if a woman DOES report this, then no matter what they say about keeping it hush, hush, it will still get out among her peers and she will be badgered by her peers for reporting it !!! THIS will bring more pressure on her that she WILL NOT be able to deal with !!!! Secondly, how many charges will be brought up against some guy, who is NOT really "harassing" some girl, and he is prosecuted and jailed because of those charges ??? Water and oil does not mix, nor do guys and girls in the military, especially on the front lines !!!!!
---------------------------------------
Dutch   1 hour ago
From the Bay Area Reporter Online ....

"A California lawmaker predicted a "donnybrook on the Senate floor" over military sexual assault incidents as legislation aimed at taking such cases out of military jurisdiction failed last week at a time when politicians and survivors said a record 26,000 incidences – 14,000 involving male victims – led to only 3,374 reported cases in 2012, and have reached an epidemic level that poses a threat to national security."

14000 out of 26000 ...
More than half ...
Hmmm ...
-------------------------------------
Regor   18 minutes ago
I remember 30 years ago the Joints Chiefs of Staff were warning this sort of violence was going to happen, along with the cultural degradation having women in the ranks entails.

Women really antagonize men in the service because of their attitude and when they want to leave, they just get pregnant and get discharged. Many use sex as a weapon to get what they want. Its ridiculous that a Nimitz Class carrier will lose about 50 women sailors in one year with this out. Or during the Persian Gulf War, over 1200 women left the war theatre because of pregnancy while about 250 service men and women were killed. Considering the resources invested in these women, This is a rip-off.
-------------------------------------
Michael   7 minutes ago
When you lower the criteria to get in, change the benefits so the good one do not apply, and put women were they do not belong, this is what you get. I can not believe people do not see what is going on in the military, the socialist are changing it, so it will fail.
------------------------------------
BRIAN   1 hour ago
I would like to know how the Harassment/assault statistics compare to civilian numbers. I do not like how harassment claims were slumped in with sexual assault claims. Combining those claims is a dishonest way to pump up the numbers. There is a huge difference between harassment and assault.
Harassment claims are not the same as actual harassment. I worked in a prison a few years ago. When newer officers would get a escort job on midnights we would prank them by telling them they needed to do a weight inventory in the yard. They would spend an hour of their night pulling out weight plates, and totaling them up only to find out they didn't have to. This was done to everyone regardless of sex or race, and everyone pranked took it with humor. One night a woman with a chip on her shoulder decided to go to the watch commander claiming harassment over it. The poor guy that set her up got rung through the ringer over it, and he was a nice guy, and a good officer.
------------------------------------
Richard   4 minutes ago
Let's face it, there will always be sexual attacks, But check out when this started to be a problem. It was when the Liberal whackos got a voice and the power to bring it out and then had the audacity to put females in the front line of the military. Their ability to perform has nothing to do with the increase if problems, it is strictly on the insistence that there is no difference in men and women which is the stupidest idea ever. You cannot put men and women in close proximity and expect nothing to happen. There is a difference. When I was in the military, we worked with women but we did not LIVE with them and there were jobs and careers which they could not enter. This was for the protection of everyone not to degrade women as todays loony liberals would have you believe.
-----------------------------------

>> There were the typical defend the Military regardless of evidence replies. Some fair points about missing harassment with rape issues. But then again, rape is often preceded by pressure, intimidation, and harassment. Really, it seems hard to justify women in combat or living with men. Up until the late 20th century, women were not in the military by any race, other than the Amazon women Herodotus records in his history. Romans had military brothels for the soldiers in garrisoned places, but not on battle grounds or serving in the Roman legions, which means we are more barbaric than even Rome ever tried to be. That is pretty scary. A lot to think about! Here are a few more:<<

TED A.    56 minutes ago
The Few Comments I read are off the subject, it seems like peoples attitude is boys will be boys. If you have access to netflix check out "the invisible war". I serviced and proud of it, but seeing this documentary made me sick of what I learned how these assaults are handle in our military. These assaults are an act of terrorism on an individual which leads to physical and/or mental damage and even death during and after the assault by the attacker or by the victims own hands, not just in the military. Military personnel are consider government property and crimes on government property is FBI's jurisdiction. these acts of terrorism should punishable with life in prison without parole and death if victim dies during or after the attack even at victim's own hands.
----------------------------------
dweezer    1 hour ago
What happens to an organization that is suppose to protect US and they can't protect their own - well what's to be expected from a group that gave the world the expression 'no ask, don't tell' - yup 'speak-up and end your career' may be the next chant - say what happened to 'Kabul-Barbie' the former cheerleader turner special ops expert that was given a silver star for just getting off the plane in Afghanistan - though she would have won the war by now - oops I think she got harassed -
----------------------------------
Bill    2 hours ago
These guys sound like the Catholic priests and their superiors in the church charged with child molestation and the cover up by moving the accused priests. Pictures speak a 1000 words, these guys look like they enjoyed the privilege of power when it comes to subordinate females then and now. Wake up America, when you feel as though it is your last day on earth you will act out in the manner you feel will make you complete. Sorry ladies but women do not belong mixed in with combat troops. They do however have the right to serve and are entitled to use the same equipment receive the same training as the male counter parts do. But to share the same quarters? Are you out of your minds? What happened to the WACS, or the WAVES and the other female units.
----------------------------------
Mike    1 hour ago
Well Gee Wiz, our government bent over backwards to get women into the military, then into combat zones then finally into combat roles. That seemed to be a priority and it GOT DONE. We have been hearing about sexual harassment for four decades! If the top does not tolerate it the ranks will make it go away. I have heard of the "good ol boy" mentality but that culture can be trained out of the ranks in one generation. Seems like the top is not really truly bothered by this. It is the only explanation.
---------------------------------
Sunshine   4 hours ago
Sexual assault should be punished at any level, the good old boy system has been crumbling for years, the elite is a joke, when ($ hungry corrupt) lawyers got involved and the assaulters got away with a slap in the hand, and the voice of the people was ignored... we were doomed. Remember what I said before a war is coming, not a race war ... not a religious war ... a war that is here but few can see. Ask yourself what one good deed did you do yesterday and can you improve on that. Can you actually get out of bed early in the morning and go look for a job and get off of the system? Can you put the liquor bottle down and instead get up and feed your children breakfast this morning? Can you hug your child? Can you check on your parents and make sure they are okay? Every day is miracle!
---------------------------------
Daryl J   8 hours ago
Real talk...the most vulnerable service member is the newbie straight out of basic/AIT at his/her first duty station. Fresh meat. Real talk. These people are supposed to have 'sponsors'...'battle buddies'...show them around and get them up to speed on the business part of the day, but after that they are left high, dry and clueless, subject to the wims of his/her roommates, who usually the ones the other squad members don't want to room with because he's a #$%$ and creepy. A few barracks members get them drunk the first weekend. Not saying they 'have their way' with the newbie, but just to see what the newbie got. Bored, drunk, young folk can think of some interesting things to pass the time. Been there, done that. That's just the male side of things. Female newbies, I have seen with my own eyes, are REALLY fresh meat. They, on average, are goo goo eyed at all the strong, sexy, clean-shaven young cats around her. And the guys see a new, lost, in-shape cutie in the barracks...co-ed, mind you. Don't get me started on that. And if she's short and petite, it's a done deal...for me anyway. Just sayin. Anyway, she, too, feeling comfortable, drinks with her fellow barracks mates and they test her to see what she got, so to speak. There's always one in the bunch who thinks he can get laid and goes for it. This is the weak one cuz he doesn't have enough 'game' to get with a female legitimately. Speaking of battle buddies, as a rule, recruits are to have a battle buddy with them at all times when approaching the drill sergeant, going to the S-1, TMC, PX, etc., while in training, but that practice disappears when they get to permanent party duty stations. That's a start. This is just one of many scenarios that can make someone a statistic. There are many more...just like outside the gate.

End of Yahoo comments

>> Its still me in red and brackets. I note that many men are also victims of rape in the military. It is not just a 1 way thing. I also notice that men often suffer from supposed harassment and anyone with job experience in America knows how out of control that PC monster has become. Men are treated like dirt. I also believe the military has been seriously hampered by placing women among the men in the military. The military setting is a cult like one, by necessity, really. You do not place women in with men, often of a gangster type of mentality, which also is quite cult-like, and not expect things to get way out of hand.

It is a very difficult and challenging prospect for new male recruits, just to survive in the military with your brain in tact. You are trained to pump up the aggression, ask no questions, and shoot to kill without remorse. Lots of pressures of all sorts. The fact you are fighting a BS war and you know, can really screw with your mind. Throw young, innocent attractive women into the mix, and you can't help but have a recipe for failure. I believe has all been an experiment that obviously failed, maybe. We may not have seen the end of this yet. Being in serious combat at the font lines, may drive both sexes into each others arms. The fear of death alone may compel them to seek one of the few outlets of solace left, which is sexual relief and escapism.

Women should not be in the military. The problem is jobs. Not enough for even 1 sex in the civilian world. That was how they planned it, of course. But what Christians should understand is that the devil is ultimately behind this direction. He wants to cut loose all sexual restraint. People all pumped up on youth hormones and sexual excitement will be able to think of little else but sex. That does not spell good for the front lines and victory. But sex will block any intelligent thinking, for sure.

I guess I need to point out that all sex was forbidden by God when ancient Israel/Judah soldiers were on a military campaign. This helped to forbid rape of the females of the vanquished and kept the minds of the soldiers on the duty at hand, which was to fight and win, within the law and restraints of the law of God.

But we can see how bullying of more than one kind exists throughout or society. Men are getting screwed, as are women, children, animals, environment. The devil is hard at it to warp our minds and corrupt our souls. We need to know who the enemy really is, besides ourselves.

One more big point to make as I read this article. Yahoo and all internet news presenters are no longer supply statistics in very visible for, saying who liked or did not like. These were very revealing which is why they stopped doing it. So the net is censored more than we think and getting worse.

---------------------------------------------

                March 26, 2014

Navy Top Gun Trainer: Social Conditioning Focus Is Suffocating Retention Efforts
March 25, 2014 by     http://personalliberty.com/2014/03/25/navy-top-gun-trainer-social-conditioning-focus-is-suffocating-retention-efforts/

"Social “conditioning” programs aimed at making the U.S. military a kinder, gentler, more lawsuit-proof workplace have begun supplanting its core mission: fighting and killing enemies.

That’s the open message a former Top Gun instructor is sending the U.S. Navy’s top brass.

The website of the nonprofit U.S. Naval Institute is featuring this month a lengthy study by Commander Guy Snodgrass, who cautions that a lack of trust in senior Naval leadership – borne from a combination of factors that includes too great an emphasis on social issues and not enough on fighting wars – is precipitating a severe enlistment and retention crisis."

" “Sailors are bombarded with annual online training, general military training, and safety stand-downs – all in an effort to combat problems that will never be defeated. The perception is that these efforts are not undertaken because they are incredibly effective, but rather because of significant political and public oversight…Sailors continue to cite the over-focus on social issues by senior leadership – above and beyond discussions on warfighting – a fact that demoralizes junior and mid-grade officers alike.”

Snodgrass, an F-18 pilot who went on to write speeches for the Pentagon Chief of Naval Operations, doesn’t solely attribute the Navy’s retention problem to its leaders’ forced fixation on sensitivity training – he lists a number of factors, each of which poses a serious problem on its own: attitudes of millennial-generation recruits about work for pay, sustained campaigns that lack tangible and principled objectives, a distressed global economy, and changes in promotional incentives within the Naval command hierarchy."

>>The battle of the sexes, caused by putting both sexes in close proximity most of the time and expect substantially raised aggression in all forms, including sexual aggression, and you have a distracting recipe for a breakdown in the military. But there are many other things eating at military morale. The government's sexual experiment to condition females to accept sexual roles in the military (which opinion is only my own, but held with great conviction on my part) has been a spectacular failure. No surprise there. Females have never relished having their bodies used without their willful and joyful consent.

But I also pose the question; First, was this intentional, perhaps, or just stupidity? It could have been either. If planned, then it is part of the game to weaken the USA thru their military. On the other hand, if unforeseen, we in the USA might be in big trouble for our lack of proper military focus, rather than getting bogged down in social experiments that were doomed to fail, anyway. But Bible prophecy indicates that the king of the North, long victorious in his military ventures, finally suffers an embarrassing defeat at the hands of the king of the South, 3.5 years into the reign of the Antichrist, whose coming I say, if not far off, perhaps just a couple or 3 years away. If so, the USA may be due to experience a devastating naval battle defeat in perhaps less than 7 years.

Could this stupidity or trying to yoke young men and women together in close quarters and combat be setting us up for a humiliating defeat, which may cost many in the military, perhaps the Navy in particular, their lives. It is within the realm of possibility. Woe to the nation who so completely devalues their females and places them in harm's way, caring little to nothing for their well-being, or perhaps intending to use them as sexual relief for the males in their ranks. Really, such a nation as that deserves defeat and destruction. You all asked for it!<<


Global Elitism: The Character Traits Of Truly Evil People

Back to Top

February 19, 2013 by
Brandon Smith 

http://personalliberty.com/2013/02/19/global-elitism-the-character-traits-of-truly-evil-people/

The first dangerous mistake the average person makes is the assumption that “evil” is a kind of subjective concept. We would love to believe that all destructive and malicious behavior is merely a product of bad environment, bad upbringing or mental psychosis. Deviance in the name of “profit” or “status” is often more acceptable to the public, as long as there is a reason we can easily understand and grasp.

What frightens the average American today is not the abhorrent action of criminality; rather, it is criminality without rationality. What frightens the common citizen is the possibility that some people hurt others not because their mommy and daddy “mistreated” them or because they have a psychological deficiency, but because they fully and consciously enjoy doing what they do.

Our society is desperate to make excuses for the monsters of our era, perhaps because we would rather not entertain the possibility that there is a dark side to humanity that, if allowed, could take control in a deliberate and calculated way.

This is why the greatest crimes of our time often go ignored by the public. The idea, for instance, that international financiers and political elites would purposely create economic disparity, social chaos and global war out of a desire for centralized power and a disturbed sense of superiority is simply too much for many to handle. Surely, these terrible events throughout our modern history are merely the result of random coincidence and human error, right?

>> He almost sounds like me, doesn't he? Obviously, the man is exceptionally brilliant, if I must say so myself ;-) But that this article should pop up Feb. 19, just 2 damn days after mine, coupled with all those that kept coming up just a day or so after I began this article and kept coming, along with the one above, this coming out today, the 21st, just seems to me to smack a little bit, of  .  .  . ah . . . Divine providence? Ya never know!

Anyway, Brandon does not believe too much in accidental explanations or coincidence, or human error to explain evil. Neither do I. But Brandon, who does not profess any particular faith and writes for a political news service, is saying what I am, all the same. It is not just a religious view of mine. It crosses all boundaries.<<

Unfortunately, this is not the case. In fact, most catastrophic cultural policies and tragedies can be traced back directly to a subset of people who use their positions of influence for ill purpose and who knowingly engineer calamity not just for personal gain, but also for the gain of their social class.

In the liberty movement, we often refer to members of this group as “globalists” or “elitists.” They permeate the upper echelons of our Nation, and they do indeed have a culture that is entirely separate and disparate from our own. If one studies their literature, initiatives and motives, he would discover another world, driven by outlandish goals and an even more outlandish brand of religious fervor. Here are some of the character traits and beliefs that make these people easy to identify.

Xenofascism 

Global elitists tend to see themselves as a separate breed of human being, a superior class with superior faculties, born to rule over the rest of us. In their writings they often espouse the teachings of The Republic by Plato and the concept of the philosopher kings. They believe that some men and women are endowed with a genetic predisposition to leadership and that the average person does not have the intelligence to determine his own destiny. They see the rest of humanity as a blank canvas and themselves as the artists. We are to be molded, and our social dichotomies are to be manipulated.

In reality, they are no smarter than the rest of us. Rather, they inherit positions of wealth and influence, and they automatically assume this makes them superior. Their ability to mold society is derived entirely from their extensive capital and their complete lack of morality. If they were not in the top .1 percent of the world’s rich, they would be treated like common criminals for their behavior. But sadly, in our day and age, money often buys undue respect. Imagine a group of John Wayne Gacys or Charles Mansons, except with 80 percent of the world’s wealth at their disposal and the means to purchase good publicity and legal immunity. That is essentially what we are dealing with.

>> I am just so grateful for Brandon's work. He brings up elitist "superiority complex" types, just as I have said, too. You know what they say about 2 or 3 witnesses, right? <<

Zero Conscience

Elitists believe that conscience is a hindrance to success, instead of a worthwhile virtue. They knowingly and deliberately abandon their moral compass because they see it as an unnatural restriction, an obstacle that makes getting what they want more difficult.  Conscience, however, never quite disappears in anyone. In order to reconcile their wretched mindset with that distant nagging sensation of guilt, they claim that their actions are “for the greater good of the greater number.” They desperately want to believe that they are serving the future of mankind and that we should appreciate their guiding hand, even though the things they do seem far more hateful than helpful. They would call this “tough love.”

>> I do not believe the elite really think their way is for the good of the greater number. I say they want to kill the greater number off. They just plain do it because they want to and are superior to us. That is all the reason they need to dismiss us and our rights and dignity, and even our lives. The paragraph next is more accurate. <<

They further attempt to avoid the fact of their own dysfunction by trying to elicit criminality in others. If they can convince the masses that morality is relative and that right and wrong are subject to interpretation, if they can convince us to ignore our own inner voices which are inborn, then their monstrosity could be considered normal — even preferable. In a world of moral relativists, the man with a conscience becomes the criminal, the outcast; and the elites become the heroes they always wanted to believe themselves to be.

Promote Collectivism

Top globalists are not necessarily collectivists themselves. In fact, they often swing far to the other end of the spectrum into an aberrant form of individualism. As discussed above, they even see conscience as a restriction on their personal freedom and rebel against it as if rebelling against enslavement. What they do not grasp is that the inherent nature of conscience is a gift, one which has, so far, kept humanity away from the brink of total self-destruction, at least to this point. It is not a prison. Rather, it is protection from ourselves.

>> This would be my point to. The conscience begs us to consider our long term interests and benefits, as opposed to the very fleeting and short term benefits from giving in to very powerful impulses of say, sexual desire. Impulses may be strong, but they are also very reckless, indiscriminate and detrimental to any long term benefits and interests. We need compassion and decency in order to survive. Brandon has quickly, in my mind, established himself as one of the leading writers of Livingston's staff in a very short time. Only Livingston himself writes articles with as much or more force at this time. Be sure to check their site and articles from the past and you can have them send emails when they put out new articles, which is nearly ever other day or so. Many are very thought provoking. <<

The elitist’s insane ideal of pure individualism without self-discipline is a private matter they rarely discuss. In public, they constantly promote the collectivist lifestyle and admonish individualism in common people. If people can be convinced that they are devoid of inherent qualities and characteristics and that their environment is the totality of their existence, then they will hand over all power to anyone who promises them the best possible surroundings. That is to say, when we have no faith in our own individualism and self-responsibility, we will automatically seek protection, usually from a nanny government or dictatorship.

People often confuse “collectivism” with “community.” This is caused by a lack of understanding as well as a lack of experience. Community is a voluntary gathering of individuals for the purpose of mutual aid. Collectivism is the gathering of people by threat of force or loss, for the purpose of consolidating power into the hands of a few. It is the act of destroying individualism in the name of protecting the group. In America today, we have disappearing sense of community, while the “advantages” of collectivism are being sung to the rooftops by global elites.

The Noble Lie

Elitists are very adamant about the idea of the noble lie, the use of a lie to attain a positive goal. In their view, average citizens lack the capacity to understand the bigger political and social picture; so we must be lied to in order to make us do what is best for ourselves. Of course, their version of what is best for our culture always seems to include first and foremost what is best for them.

>> I do believe the average citizen lacks most capacity to think or act in his or her own interests beneficially. Not because it had to be that way, but by the course they have chosen from childhood on, it ended up that way. This makes it easy for the elite to lie to us, since we do not know better. We are gullible and stupid, sheep waiting for the slaughter, which is sure to come in time. The elite what the world all to themselves.<<

The noble lie is a logical fallacy of epic proportions, and I often wonder if global elitists secretly doubt its legitimacy. If you need to lie to people in order to get them to accept your ideas, then there must be something terribly wrong with your ideas. Ideas with vitality and honesty do not need to be “sold” to the public through chicanery; the truth takes on a life of its own. Only destructive philosophies need a foundation of lies in order to take root.

>> I do not believe that the elite lie in order to sell what they think if for your best interests. They know they are trying to take your rights and eventually, wipe you and many off the face of the earth. They lie with the purpose of deceiving and harming. No other reason!<<

Population Reduction

One of the centerpieces of the globalist religion is the concept of population reduction. They not only see themselves as a separate species with superior genetic makeup and a propensity for rulership, they also see the rest of us as cockroaches and “useless eaters,” a herd that needs to be culled. The funny thing about population reductionists is that they always want other people to die in order to save the planet. They never offer their own life as a sacrifice for the greater good. This is because they assume they are too important (ostensibly because they think they are intelligent), while many of us are expendable.

>> Brandon also subscribes, as I do, to the elitist/superiority concept in the elite of elites, as I have made clear many times on this site of mine. They justify it as Brandon relates above. Ain't it great to be loved :-) But as for world population, I do think that we need to react responsibly and that resources are getting stretched to their limits and we can not control what we have now. I do think we could benefit from at least a zero growth policy, at the very least, until we can manage what we have effectively, before allowing more growth, if we allow more growth.<<

Of course, overpopulation today is an oversold myth that has been disproven in many scientific circles. Population expansion is also not necessarily a bad thing. Greater population means more minds working on more problems. It drives technological advancement and forces us through the survival imperative to invent more efficient methods of production. There are advantages to growth.

In the end, though, global elites do not care about the Earth. They do not believe in population reduction because they want to reduce pollution or the so-called “carbon footprint,” save the poor animals, or even protect finite resources. They want population reduction because first, they are eugenicists who see some people as genetically inferior to others, and second, because a culled population is easier to dominate. Again, fewer minds working means fewer problems solved and fewer individuals to rock the boat when the state abuses its power.

>> Brandon nails it, dead center! <<

The Source Of Our Pain

Globalists are not the only source of our social pain. We bear some responsibility. When we are not vigilant, when we deny our own ignorance and refuse to learn, when we lie to ourselves and when we cater to personal superficial desires rather than taking the future into account, we open the door for the devil. Evil, like conscience, resides in us all.

>> Yes, we are our own enemies. I emphasize lying to ourselves, which can also be described as being in denial of reality, and wanting to live in a world of make believe, a form of escapism, is the single most dangerous trait humans tend to possess. Rather than run for horror and deny it exists, we need to learn that trying to overcome horror is much more effective, as a long term strategy.

To this end, as Bandon also pointed out, requires vigilance and passionate pursuit of knowledge and understanding, and acting on those. I have always found that truth usually is foun din voices of dissent, not those of popular sentiment embraced by authority and power. For that its worth! Let he who has ears, listen to what the spirit says.<<

That said, global elites are not just randomly terrible people. They have constructed an entire culture of deviance. They are organized evil, and this is a problem we must deal with soon. Good men are defined not only by their adherence to the inner voice of truth, but also by their willingness to act when the truth is threatened. We must educate others and, when the time comes, put ourselves in harm’s way to remove the globalist ilk before they destroy everything in a raging elitist fervor.

–Brandon Smith            >>End of Article<<

 >> Did you see what I boldfaced just above? The elite have deliberately and carefully engineered this whole disaster we are heading for. I agree with most of Brandon's sentiment, with just one caution to follow. I am going back to regular black text now, without brackets.<<

Not only is our conscience and decency important, as he said (in slightly different words), and even acting when truth is threatened. I would vary with just one point. It is not ours, we who call ourselves real genuine Christians, to stop the elite and their plans. Only God is capable of doing that, at this point. Not only capable, but God does not like anyone else tampering with what He reserved for Himself, exclusively, to perform. He is jealous of His jurisdictions and territory, so to speak.

We can not stop the elite and should stop the elite, as far as physical (violent) force goes. We do preach and condemn evil in word and not do evil ourselves, so that we may not be unapproved by God. We act as the collective conscience of the world. That said, we will be hated for this role and will either be killed, a fate for a sizeable few of us, or be put away from the public in prisons and concentration camps so that we may no more bother their consciences as they violate every last rule of goodness and decency, and say it is right and reason, when it is just pure evil, with no regard for the weak, meek, defenseless, or vulnerable.

So if someone says to you, you are afraid to fight, you can say yes, I am very afraid that God will be most displeased if I do not obey Him when He tells me not to fight and that it is His right to fight, without my interference. I am not one to pick a fight with God. I am much smarter than that.

Despite our not being willing to fight the Elite in physical or violent ways, they shall hate and kill us so we are not cowards nor are we silly enough to believe that if we refrain from violence, we will be spared prosecution, persecution, imprisonment and even execution. No, we shall suffer, no matter which side we choose. We prefer God's side, to that of the devil and his earthly elite, who do know the devil and follow him devoutly. In fact, I have no doubt that some are even in direct communication with him at times.

So we are not cowards, nor do we run from anything. We will suffer, no matter what. What you, the reader must know, is that death will be the ultimate prospect for most living and that Christians who die, will be brought back to life. Those who do not honor God, will think they escaped by joining the elite, but they will soon find out there is no escape from death when you joining the elite. Sooner or later, your time is coming, unless you, too, join God rather than the devil and his minions.


The Devil's Mentality
Back to Top

What is that mentality? Revelation says that the devil has come down to earth in our day, having great anger, that he was proved wrong by humans and could not break Jesus as a man, and that now the devil is near to death. So he wants to hurt and keep as many people from getting everlasting life as he can. He wants to ruin it for each one of us. But there is more. He wants to wreck and desecrate all that God has put in place and ruin it all. That means, primarily, God's laws, morals, and ethics, that have been assigned to us to follow and keep.

So the devil wants to turn kids' lives into misery and get us to overthrow all good sense and decency. Everything that has been held back so far, will be broken. I do not have a bit of doubt about this. Further, it is the will of God to show how worthless and useless the world of people has become, so that there is hardly a soul worth preserving. How bad has the world gotten in these last days? Is it excusable or understandable? No, it is not and I am going to use another article from an outside secular source, so you can see that it is not just my religious stance. Anyone with half a brain can see the obvious changes taking place before our eyes. And absent from it all, is intelligent thought and reason. It is the absence of any thought and any effort. It is supreme laziness of mind. God hates sloth and laziness. They are harmful and they are evidence that no progress is in motion and that there is no real goal to obtain and nothing to defend.

Life takes effort. It requires continual maintenance and repair, so to speak. it demands effort and being pro-active. Laziness is not pro-active, or even reactive. It is passive and submissive to whatever is around. We all stand or all fall, depending on whether we defend who and what we are or not. A chain is as strong as its weakest link. So if there are some among us who are not maintaining our moral and intellectual borders and boundaries, then it will eventually get us all.

Children must be actively prepared for life and personal defense. We can not be passive nor abdicate in our responsibility toward preparing our children. Sex is an amazing thrill and high. But our Father God gave us that pleasure with strings attached, with responsibilities and we do not have the choice to ignore those responsibilities. We must honor them and keep them. Our children depend on us and Gods' great plan depends on us and He will not tolerate us ignoring our duties to our children and Him. No one refusing God will be in His kingdom. Either accept that responsibility, or die!

Now some will say, it is God that is the bully. You can put it that way, if you want. In Isaiah, God says He is teaching us to benefit ourselves. God will not let children ever suffer again, once His Kingdom and authority are restored. So to protect them, he demands that parents give their children their all. That is God's law! Look, we have seen what disobedience to God has led to. Do you really like that? Its been nothing but brutal suffering and slavery for most. So God is no bully. He simply does not want suffering and there is only one way to avoid that. If you have sex, you must marry and you must love your partner deeply and devotedly and you must both love your children with passion and devotion, preparing them for anything and everything. It is just that simple.

But as the not too distant future, the entire world will neglect marriage and embrace a new open sex philosophy, which to many, truly will seem like paradise. But paradise will not last long. What the devil really wants, is for every one of us to be dead, if possible. He has that much contempt for us as a creation of God. But to get there, he wants to dissolve every last bit of resistance and independent thought, so that he can do whatever he wants and needs to, to accomplish world-wide destruction of the human race. Yes, its a fact!

And along the way, Satan wants to give God the middle finger, if you will. And one of those ways to really disrespect God and we who love and follow God, is to defile and humiliate children, by making them sex objects at far younger ages than God ever intended.

We do have one oddity here. While, according to mind control victims of secret government operations, girls being programmed from conception, will be sexually "initiated" at age 2. And I believe those mind control victims. If you looked into it, you might, too. You can disregard me if you want and you can avoid looking into it. Search for "Brice Taylor" or "Kathleen Sullivan," for starters and move on from there. They have both published books and both had been at one time, mind controlled and raped literally thousands of times, beginning at 2 or 3 and on.

If  they wait till 6, that is still absurd. But on the other hand, due to governments wanting to program children till into their 20s, they demand schooling at least through 12 grades, age 18, and prefer college continuance past 22 and even 28. Of course, waiting to have sex until married is not likely when marriage is difficult when not working full time. So sex without marriage or commitment is the rule and ruin of us all. Kids happen, whether you plan it or not and unwed pregnancies are a disaster for all.

But in between these 2 opposing forms of madness and insanity, is God's way, which is that parents and society make room and provision for the young to marry when they develop their secondary sexual characteristics or near to that point. Both parents and society should make it possible, without great debt or difficulty, to enable a young couple to survive and most likely breed, at some point, by intention or maybe by accident. It is not obligatory to have kids, but it is usually inevitable, sooner or later.

Secondary sexual characteristics usually come along from about 12-16 in most cases. These would be the typical ages to marry under God's law. Today's law would never allow 12 year olds to marry. Or even 16, for that matter. Yet, while laws prevent this, in secret, powerful and famous people have sex with children, with girls beginning full coital sex at just 6. But then, their vaginas have been conditioned to be able to handle full adult male organs, according to mind control sources.

So we have yet another complete contradiction. Schooling, or should I say, brain washing, demands kids not marry till indoctrinated and programmed, long past 18. And yet, in secret, those same lawmakers go after 6 year old girls or some prefer little boys. There is a different set of laws for the elite. "Don't do as I do, Do as I say!" That is their directive to us. Aren't we lucky to have them?

So you see when we go along with absurd and far too long a preparatory period of education and delayed marriage for youth, we help sow the seeds of our own destruction. We create the perfect recipe for unwed pregnancies and societal breakdown as a result. God will take care of the creeps that in secret, do such wicked things.

But I also propose that soon, in open public, or at least in large gatherings of people of like minds behind private doors, at banquet like facilities, will carry on in the same manner, have sex with others wives and husbands and even bringing kids into it. How young? I seriously doubt that there will be any limits. When they finally get to this point, there will be no one around to protest or object. Everyone will be doing it. They will go from laws against it to everyone doing it. A complete 180 flip. But in hardly no time at all, the dying will begin on a scale that most could never imagine. Not in the millions, but several billion, minimum. Jesus said that the likes of it has never been seen before and will never be seen again. And Jesus will have to stop it before it finishes or no one would have been saved.

---------------------------------------------

Feb. 8, 2013, I came across this in early afternoon and entered it here right away. Headlines:

Mom pleads guilty to allowing men to repeatedly molest her 6-year-old daughter (Photos)

child sexual abuse        January 31, 2013    By:

Dalina Nicholas, 36, from Jacksonville Beach, Fla. pleaded guilty in court Wednesday to allowing her 6-year-old daughter to be repeatedly molested and sexually abused in exchange for drugs and money.

The charges against the Fla. mom amounted to four guilty counts of child neglect.

She hasn't been sentenced yet, but is facing a minimum of 15 years to a maximum of 30 years behind bars according to The Florida Times-Union, even with the plea deal she received in court on Jan. 30 when a charge of sexual battery against her was dropped. As part of that plea deal, the bad mom will be testifying against the men that she allowed molest her daughter.

Police found out about the abuse in March 2012 after a homeless man signaled a passing police officer and told him the girl was being molested in a Sixth Street South home. The man said he’d been to the home to use drugs in the past and seen several different men having sex with the girl.

Nicholas will be testifying against Quinn Brooks, 57, Ryan Harrover, 34, John Hagans, 48, and Norman Thompson, 52. The charges against the four men include sexual battery, and lewd or lascivious molestation. Dalina Nicholas won’t be sentenced until the court cases against the four men have concluded.

The young victim and her younger brother are now staying with other family members.
>> End of Account <<

Keep these facts in mind. It was the mother who sold her daughter out. It was 4 men, who had evidently been having sex with this girl a number of times. Obviously criminal, right? No arguments I assume? But you know, many people consider big business men and financiers criminals, too. Many are of the opinion that most if not all politicians are also criminals. If so, are they also capable of these kinds of things? Mind control victims answer emphatically, yes, we have seen this done all the time. We have even seen many porn videos made of these things. Of course, if so, you won't find these in your typical porn store. This is super black market stuff.

If 4 men and a mom conspire to do these things to a 6 year old girl, what is left for the world? I then offer this. How far away are many more, from doing this very same sort of thing? Could it be that most of the world is just a few short steps away from completely turning on the weak and helpless, kids in particular, but any woman of mildness and gentleness would be just as vulnerable. If suddenly, a large number of people began to use children for sex with "oversight" approval, how long would it take for everyone to join in, with any objectors being done away with? Yeah, you think about it. Me? I am far too informed and cynical about human nature to say that I am surprised. But I am still sickened, that we can not be moved to feel pity for a very young defenseless and innocent girl and refrain from such horrific actions.

Also consider that it was a homeless drug addict who, even in his far gone state, felt sickened and reported the crime to police. So while some have lost their minds and senses, without good explanation or reason, a desperate and poor drug addict still felt repulsed by such atrocities. Thank God there are a few left, huh? But I believe that few will continue to dwindle in number till there are no dissenting voices of condemnation. Then everyone can come "out of the closet" and feast on small children, among many other things.

What really gets me is that prosecutors are going to let the mom off light as long as she testifies against the 4 men. I'm all for getting the 4 men, but mom was just as guilty as they were. She was no mom at all. Not even human anymore. The little girl was 6 so she could talk and tell what happened. The homeless addict squealed and surely he would testify. You have the physical evidence of the girl's damage to her private regions. What more do you need? Let mom fry. Justice is never justice. It is always so flawed and makes no sense.

God has allowed this to go on, for a big  reason. He has a case to prove against the Devil, who raised charges against God and God's motives for wanting all the worship of humans to himself. The devil, claiming to be such a nice guy, is the one who loves to make humans miserable and does not see 6 year olds as being off limits. By now, it ought to be clear that God was right and is the nice guy in this trial. But as well, God wants to show us hoe even breaking a very small law such as eating a piece of forbidden fruit from a tree, can set into motion the very worst of atrocities, eventually leading to mankind's destruction, if  not for God's intervention for those deserving it.

God also proposes that the devil has misled the world, not due to the devil and his arguments being good, but on account of people being so useless. How useless? They will go along with the mass rape of 6 year olds (if not younger) and many other horrible acts.

Ah, ah, I know what you're thinking. You think I have gone out of my mind. And by the salvation of Jehovah, I hope you are right. But, unfortunately, I believe prophecy will  prove me right. I believe I have that good a handle on this whole thing. To the best of my knowledge, I am the only one preaching this thing and doing so with boldness! I have heard Alex Jones say he believes that eventually, having sex with kids will become openly legal. But he has not elaborated on it. I have right here.

I will also say this. If someone confess that he would love to have sex with or marry a beautiful 14 year old, I would not condemn him. I believe this is a natural instinct, placed there by God, no less. The perfection of Beauty belongs to the young. Aging is a process of decay. We get worse, not better, with age. So unlike many "conservatives" who imagine they are so righteous and holy, I understand the appeal of a newly blossomed young woman. I do not call 14 years old of either sex, a little girl or little boy. It is absurd. They are often capable of breeding at that age and have the desire to do so. So they are not little. They need to start acting like adults. That they are capable of breeding demands they be treated as adults and held accountable as adults.

What I am fully condemning, particularly when they are pre-pubescent, is going after small girls of less than 11 years of age. I have often seen dramatic differences in 11 year olds. I have seen some at age 11, who could pass for 8. And I have seen 11 year olds who look 15. The difference is whether they have begun, finished, or are near to beginning puberty. Further, I am not one who subscribes to the idea that consent does not change things for teens. I believe teens are capable of consent and do know what they are doing or should know.

So I give far more room for mercy and understanding than any other critic of these atrocious actions against small children. But there is a bridge too far to cross. And let this also be clear. I am not advocating breaking any law. Law says teens are off limits and I respect and obey that and urge others to do so. But I do not expect that this will erase our natural genetic inclinations toward beauty. We simply can not act on all natural inclinations. Some, due to abuse or whatever, may have "natural" inclinations that are quite criminal. We must resist these. We must constrain and restrain ourselves as if in a straight jacket of our our making.

Consider one more thing. If we are brought up by a world that is insensitive and continually assaults our sense of dignity and violates our boundaries, we grow calloused and insensitive our selves. So if we let the world go out of control and ourselves out of control, we further reinsure add guarantee that we will, in our lifetimes or in those shortly after us, that we will bring about the destruction of the human race. We will not need either the devil or God to do this.

Infants are born super sensitive. I say super sensitive, but it is actually the proper amount of sensitivity. It is just that we have become so insensitive, that we do not know how to handle the sensitivity of a baby or child. We are far too insensitive to their delicate sense of feeling. Feelings are treated as of no account. Bruises become wounds, which then fester and turn cancerous in the mind. Next thing you know, someone goes on a violent rampage.

I call you attention to the intense love of some couples when their romance is new and idealized, perhaps. When being intimate in kissing or something like that, they, if it is  a tender romantic love, an infatuated love, perhaps; then they are really tender, gentle, and caring in their kisses and embrace. Their words are tender, careful, gentle, soothing, loving, caressing. They are very sensitive to each other and careful not to hurt. The feelings of the other become very important to each.

While this seems elevated, I would suggest that this is what should be all the time, if we were perfect and uninjured psychologically (free from sin). The problem is, that we are all so wounded and hurt, that we can not sustain the sensitivity. Without meaning to, we end up slighting and hurting each other and begin to diminish the caring and sensitivity toward the other, because we then feel hurt when slighted. And we all do it. Everyone, no exceptions. Some do it seldom enough to maintain a working relationship while others let it rage out of control and separate.

In the end, it is our choice to either let the worst in us rage out of control, or instead, bite the bullet, and try to restrain ourselves as much as possible, from hurting others. This is why I have always thought it far more important to be kind, rather than worry about cuss words we might shout out when frustrated, as long as they are not aimed at people.

It is a mistake to think we can be perfect. It is also a mistake to make excuses for our failures and not continually try to fight our fallen nature and not try to be better. We also have to grow a thick skin and not be so sensitive to what others may say about us. We must be willing to absorb some abuse.

So lets have a look at this secular article I spoke of earlier. It is time!


Sheeple: Another Look At A Sad Breed         February 5, 2013 by Brandon Smith 
Back to Top

 Found at:        http://personalliberty.com/2013/02/05/sheeple-another-look-at-a-sad-breed/

Photo on left: Photos.com

>> I'll be making comments in red/brown text with these weird brackets I use. This article inspired many things in me. It brought up nothing new, but it did say many things very eloquently, which is something that often eludes ole Truth1 and his lack of tact and softness in presenting the hard abrasive truth.

I strongly urge you to take a look at the site this came from and is linked to.  Many good articles on it. <<

Some phrases are steeped in immediately recognizable symbolism. When we hear them, we instantly know to whom and to what the phrases refer; we can even gain a greater depth of understanding to a particular situation because of them. They cause us to step outside our environment and look at it in an entirely different way. They might make us laugh. They might make us cry. But we are not indifferent to these affecting words.

The term “sheeple” has quickly become a word that defines an era. It is not just a tool for ridicule, though it does indeed seem to hurt the feelings of the ignorant and unaware (which, to my mind, is a good thing; if they can feel shame about their factual inadequacies, then perhaps one day they can be redeemed). No, there is much more going on here.

When one is surrounded by blatant absurdity and total loss of freedom, compassion and humanity, he needs a way to describe the horror, to shed light on the dark insanity of it, to remove the barriers of confusion and to build a clear path to reason. He needs to quantify the threat so that he can move beyond it and toward understanding.

In our modern age, we are absolutely stricken with an epidemic of willful idiocy that bears no rational excuse. A century ago, such behavior in a culture could have been chocked up to a bottleneck in the flow of concrete information. But today, mankind has a veritable buffet of data at his fingertips at any given moment. Facts and truth can be found with a mere modicum of effort and a remedial passion for learning. We can plead “lack of access” no longer.

Yes, our government and our society have become corrupt to the core. Yes, the traditional sources of information in the mainstream media are utterly useless and dishonest. Yes, our public educational system is completely Federalized, and our schools have been warped into lemming factories where young minds are bled dry of all creative power and individuality. Yes, the system we are born into is designed to make us stupid. However, the establishment has not yet been able to extinguish our ability to walk away. We all have a choice: to be taught by others or to learn for ourselves.

At the end of the day, sheeple are sheeple not because they have to be, but because they want to be.

It is the greatest and most exploitable weakness of man: our willingness to sacrifice anything in order to avoid admitting we know nothing. This is the philosophical slum of the common “sheeple.” It is pathetic and ugly, and it is a rampant plague upon the world.

The time is coming (very soon, I believe) when the subpopulation of sheeple will be used as cannon fodder to institute change in America on an unprecedented scale. It has happened many times throughout history. The establishment, seeking unlimited power, brandishes the dimmer subsections of the populous like a political baseball bat, swinging them about wildly in an attempt to smash the ideological enemies of the state. Often, the sheeple are oblivious to the fact that they are being used as a weapon against liberty and truth. They know only that they must participate to survive, even if that survival ends up being a hollow and meaningless life.

>> Put in plain terms, Smith is saying we are heading for another world war, the 3rd one in about 100 years. This war will enable far greater changes in society than WWII brought, and WWII brought a lot. What sort of changes? Wild, completely unrestrained sexual behavior of all types. All previous lawful restraints will be overturned, as it is said that antichrist will change times and law. He will announce a new world order. He will condemn the old world and governments and their laws and corruption. But in reality, he will be more corrupt than they were. In fact, those governments and those who were and are behind them, as the very same ones who are behind the antichrist, the great false messiah and "God."

He will be made to look like he hates the corruption of the old legal systems. He will be presented as an outsider but he is one of them, through and through. Do not get fooled by this SOB (So Obviously Bad). Do not get lost in Smith's very sophisticated literary style. The "dimmer subsections of the populous" refers to the worst types of low life that are used by power, such as criminals, ass-kissers, brown-nose'rs, suck-ups, tattle tales, snitches, and other such scum and villainy. These will try to turn good people in and it will work. Real Christians will be imprisoned or sent to concentration camps, by the will of God, in order to preserve them, even though the devil does it to demoralize and break them. Real Christians will be told they are being locked up forever but Revelation and Daniel say only 3.5 years. You can take that to the bank!<<

Now more than ever it is important for the liberty movement to understand and identify who these people are and what makes them tick. Time grows short, and it is easy for us to become mired in the haze of a glassy-eyed herd. Sheeple can be saved from themselves, but only if they can be made to recognize these particular behaviors as part and parcel of their own folly.

>> This is one of the very few points on which  I am going to disagree with. We can not wake most sheeple up or save them. They are unavoidable and un-reformable as a whole. The irony is, that those who use these dregs of society, also despise them. And the time will come when the elite will dispose of the dregs. The dregs do not see that coming. But I do. <<

Institutionalized Laziness

Some sheeple are not ignorant because they are unintelligent. Rather, they are ignorant because they refuse to expend any energy in discovering the facts of their world. They have become used to the idea of being taught, rather than going out to learn for themselves. It is easier to be told what to think than it is to develop one’s own worldview. Sheeple often state that they “just want to be left alone” and “don’t want to think about the troubles of the world,” yet nearly all of them at the same time want to feel as though they have an effect on the future. They want the benefits of a sound and balanced society, but they don’t want to put in the work to make such a society possible. They want “other people” to make the system work, and “other people” are certainly willing to take advantage of sheeple inaction.

>> Smith really nails this one. Sheeple are lazy to the core. They do not want to exert any effort in their own behalf. But 1 more element exists. Sheeple are very timid and afraid of any confrontation or scary situations. Easily intimidated! They will do anything in the world to avoid harm, or risk something. They run from any uncomfortable situation at all. What they lack is any sort of courage. A capable person must have and possess some personal courage, strength, conviction, and independence of mind. One must actively pursue good goals or one will get swept away by an active current against them. We must resist the current and the tide and swim against them. Good people must be pro-active. Yes, I know I said this earlier. Just a reminder! <<

Arrogance Without Merit

I have met many people in my life who are not fully aware of how their world works or why terrible things happen to them. This by itself is not necessarily bad. If one is able to accept that he needs to learn more, then he has far surpassed most of society in the strength of his character. Unfortunately, sheeple do not share this attitude. They not only lack remedial knowledge on most issues, but they are also unwilling to admit it. They even viciously attack those who do have substantial information.

Is this due to an inferiority complex? Possibly. They are so invested in the mainstream worldview as presented by media entities and government that they take it as gospel. They live the mainstream ideal; but, secretly, they harbor doubts. They know that they do not have the capacity to defend the system if confronted by an intelligent and well-versed opponent, so they develop a demeanor of arrogance and contempt for those who question it. This uppity manner is a defense mechanism meant to hide the weakness of their arguments. Combined with ad hominem attacks and physical threats, sheeple try to ward off critics so they do not have to engage in a legitimate debate they know they will lose.

Always Worried What The ‘Majority’ Thinks 

Sheeple are steeped in the realm of the mainstream, so much so that they have become nothing but a cog in the machine of the collective mind. Their entire existence is predicated on blind faith in the system. If the system is proven to be flawed, then they are proven to be flawed by extension. They will ignore all reason and defend the system wildly, as if trapped by some cult, because their fragile identity is dependent upon the continued prosperity of the establishment.

In most cases, sheeple are motivated by nothing but fear. In their early years, they likely either caved to the force of peer pressure and learned to diminish their personal pain by constantly conforming to the majority view or sought inclusion in the majority very early on and became addicted to the power that the collective is able to wield over others. In either case, they never actually questioned whether or not the “majority” was right in its behavior. Instead, they decided at some point in their life that the majority is always right simply because it is the majority.

>> I think also that sheeple, due to intellectual laziness to learn or do anything their behalf, would not be able to defend any ideas that challenge the majority or authority. So because they have no ability and no desire to gain any, they simply accept and go along with any thing, no matter how immoral or hurtful to others it is. They have no backbone or strength of character. They are bottom feeders and leeches. They offer society absolutely nothing. They are less than worthless and they are no longer fit for life. If you can go along with any bad thing, no matter how horrible it is, then what good are you? This is what God would like us to understand. These people serve no useful purpose to God or Good people.

These are the type of people who will not hesitate to welcome 6 year olds as sexual "partners." I doubt the 6 year olds will care much for it.<<

Never Questions The Professional Class

Sheeple are easily impressed by anyone with a nice suit, uniform, lab coat or an embossed diploma or title. They see and revere the costume, regardless of the man inside it. For sheeple, titles and positions of arbitrary authority make the opinions of a man more than opinion; his opinions suddenly become law.

>> Put another way, sheeple are impressed by any sign of authority as Smiths lists. It easier that way as you do not have to think about it and learn to judge and discern. That might take some effort. "Never!" But Smith forgot celebrity. Sheeple are very impressed by celebrity. If you are a star of some sort, then they act as if the star was, by default, also an authority. Often stars promote authority or advocate authorities' positions.<<

While a liberty movement activist looks for the legitimacy within the individual professional, the sheeple place all faith within the institution that professional represents.  His personal character is of no consequence to them, and the idea that he may have no clue what he is talking about does not occur to them.

Obsession With The State

Because the average sheeple hasn’t the slightest inkling of how to be independent or self-sufficient, they attach their survival to the success of the state. They see the word of the state as sacrosanct, and they have no concept of government by the people. They will sing the praises of democratic elections and the will of the public in general participation; but when the state goes against that will and does what it pleases, they will seek to rationalize this criminality.

For them, government might be fallible (or not), but this fallibility does not change the finality of state authority. The government is not to be interfered with and certainly not to be opposed. To stand against the state is to stand against law; and the law, in their minds, is god. Questions of morality are irrelevant. They have become so far detached from their consciences that there is nothing left but a pitch-black void, waiting to be filled with the demands of oligarchy.

When confronted by men who are willing to fight and die to interfere with the abuse of state authority, they respond with shock and revulsion. How could anyone possibly stand against the will of the mainstream and its government champions? How dare they defy the establishment?

Predictable Responses

Sheeple are highly predictable, two-dimensional creatures. When confronted with their own failings, they will follow a pre-programmed list of responses meant to divert and confuse discussion.

>> Next is a Momentous Paragraph that deserves a headline so this will have to do <<

They will claim that “everyone thinks they are smarter than everyone else” and that the “truth is relative.” History does not support this twisted view, however. There are always moments in which some people are morally and intellectually correct, while many others are dangerously misguided. Some people make decisions that lead to chaos and destruction while others make decisions that lead to prosperity and creation. The truth — the cold, hard truth — is not relative. It is unyielding, uncompromising and final. To be successful as human beings requires us to be on the right side of truth more often than we are not. To assume that the truth is malleable to our particular desires of the moment is to always be on the wrong side.

>> The devil is great for claming truth is relative, ever changing, as times, people, and circumstances change. But the changes he refers to, do not merit change. People do not change. Human nature is the same as it always was and our needs have remained ever the same. The devil and his followers are great for stupid excuses, even as David Berg made stupid reasons for why prostitution was suddenly OK, and sex with your children was just fine, too. The coming excuses should be no surprise. They are the same as they were before. Its loving, its beautiful. But really, its full unbridled aggressive lust behind it and lust is not gentle, patient, or considerate when fully ignited. Its wild and out of control and so are those who use stupid arguments of relative morality and truth.

There are monumental permanent truths, which are foundation blocks for a healthy society. They are never changing and eternal, even as God is. On the other hand, there are subjects that have some relativity in them, what we might call shades of gray. Not everything is black and white, cut and dried. But many things are. Picking on small, defenseless, helpless young children will always be wrong for all eternity. God designed obvious signs to alert us to sexual availability. Pubic hair, breasts, growth spurts, and other such changes. We are not left wondering.

So there is no excuse, love or otherwise, to suddenly take up sexual activity with kids or force women into having sex with whoever wants them, even if it is claimed that the sexual relief they provide might help win a war. The devil just wants to confuse and twist things and appeal to our most base character, which we all have lurking inside us. we have to be on guard against the base character inside us. That is where strength, courage, and character come in. <<

Sheeple rely primarily on character assassination and belligerent disregard for logic in order to derail debate. They do not attack your position so much as they attack you personally. They scoff, giggle and taunt like children; but when it’s all over, they usually say very little of any substance.

Finally, they will use the weapon of majority opinion as a get-out-of-jail-free card; and, in most cases, this is not a ploy. They really do believe that if the larger percentage of the public accepts a conviction, then that conviction automatically becomes fact. Their goal, therefore, is to constantly ride the wave of majority opinion so that they will always be in a position of righteousness. Of course, this way of thinking has in the past led to some of the worst atrocities in history. The collective mind has no concern for individual freedom, including the freedom to live in peace. Violence in the name of conformity is very common in such cultures.

Sheeple are puppets in the game of political reconstruction, and it’s their job to cheerlead the establishment and to drown out all honest voices. They are generally remorseless as long as they never have to face tangible consequences for their blind support of the system. They seek to strengthen the bars of the prison because the outside world of free thought and expression intimidates and paralyzes them. In an environment where survival is dependent on individual merit and principle, sheeple hold no currency, no capital. This might explain their overt hatred of individualists. When we in the liberty movement seek to unchain and decentralize the world, we indirectly cut the umbilical cord to them. They see our fight for freedom as a threat to their very lives. Sadly, their comfort is derived entirely from our enslavement.

–Brandon Smith            >>End of Article and text in red/brown.<<

-------------------------------------------

Can you now see why people who do nothing, are nothing? The gap can not be closed. Worthless is as worthless does. You can not make a silk purse from a sow's ear. Garbage in > Garbage out. Get it? We who use our minds and have independent thought and choose to defend what we think, we are bound to clash with those who don't. We will, for a time, experience persecution and be silenced, so as not to rain on their parade or prick their consciences as they rip into a 6 year old.

These are just not nice people. The hand writing is on the wall. They have to go. But how ironic that they will go, by the hand of those they supported, and by the devil. God will have a few left to get rid of, but not many. The elite will take care of the many!


Latest on Women Being Drafted            May 2, 016
Back to Top

The Article commences without interruption. I have that for after in this one.

Requiring women to register for draft is equality in slavery
Posted on http://personalliberty.com/requiring-women-to-register-for-draft-is-equality-in-slavery/

The amendment is a response to the Pentagon’s decision to allow women to serve in combat. Supporters of drafting women point out that the ban on women in combat was the reason the Supreme Court upheld a male-only draft. Therefore, they argue, it is only logical to now force women to register for Selective Service. Besides, supporters of extending the draft point out, not all draftees are sent into combat.

Most of those who opposed drafting women did so because they disagreed with women being eligible for combat positions, not because they opposed the military draft. Few, if any, in Congress are questioning the morality, constitutionality, and necessity of Selective Service registration. Thus, this debate is just another example of how few of our so-called “representatives” actually care about our liberty.

Some proponents of a military draft justify it as “payback” for the freedom the government provides its citizens. Those who make this argument are embracing the collectivist premise that since our rights come from government, the government can take away those rights whether it suits their purposes. Thus supporters of the draft are turning their backs on the Declaration of Independence.

While opposition to the draft is seen as a progressive or libertarian position, many conservatives, including Ronald Reagan, Barry Goldwater, and Robert Taft, where outspoken opponents of conscription. Unfortunately, the militarism that has led so many conservatives astray in foreign policy has also turned many of them into supporters of mandatory Selective Service registration. Yet many of these same conservatives strongly and correctly oppose mandatory gun registration. In a free society you should never have to register your child or your gun.

Sadly, some opponents of the warfare state, including some libertarians, support the draft on the grounds that a draft would cause a mass uprising against the warfare state. Proponents of this view point to the draft’s role in galvanizing opposition to the Vietnam War. This argument ignores that fact that it took several years and the deaths of thousands of American draftees for the anti-Vietnam War movement to succeed.

A variation on this argument is that drafting women will cause an antiwar backlash as Americans recoil form the idea of forcing mothers into combat. But does anyone think the government would draft mothers with young children?

Reinstating the draft will not diminish the war party’s influence as long as the people continue to believe the war propaganda fed to them by the military-industrial complex’s media echo chamber. Changing the people’s attitude toward the warfare state and its propaganda organs is the only way to return to a foreign policy of peace and commerce with all.

Even if the draft could serve as a check on the warfare state, those who support individual liberty should still oppose it. Libertarians who support violating individual rights to achieve a political goal, even a goal as noble as peace, undermine their arguments against non-aggression and thus discredit both our movement, and, more importantly, our philosophy.

A military draft is one of — if not the — worst violations of individual rights committed by modern governments. The draft can also facilitate the growth of the warfare state by lowing the cost of militarism. All those who value peace, prosperity, and liberty must place opposition to the draft at the top of their agenda.
<<<< End of Article

Truth1 >>>>      And now my 2 cents worth! This is 2016. Most of this Truth1 article was done in 2013. So its 3 years later and I had predicted where this was all going with women in the military, including sexual slavery. In fact, I am going to do one further. All nations are controlled by the same spiritual authority and power. The goal of that entity, Satan, is to make all women whores and sexual slaves, degrading God's creation and intended purpose for women; a respectful,  meaningful purpose. They were to be loved cherished breeders. All of us were intended to be breeders.

Satan intends to defile and brutalize women and ruin them and their potential with extreme abuse. The military is Satan's choice to pull this off. All nations will participate and all militaries will enjoy the use of each others women. No one will complain about it on either side. They intend to break the spirit of women and maybe men, too. I suspect that will happen as well.

Welcoming women with the right to serve in combat was introduced into this article earlier, in 2013. I made predictions as to where it was heading. And guess what? I was right, wasn't it? Your not surprised, are you? Really?

Now ladies, you have equality. True equality! But I have never been in favor of equality. I favor God's "partial" solution where each sex has a prescribed role, that does not easily lend to raping or forcibly prostituting women. Women do not belong in combat or the military. They do not belong in government according to God, nor as a religious leader. God had a protected role for women and a protected means of survival in make land in inherited right without cost. FREE!

Now that you have the "right" to go into combat and die, too. Or get captured and raped. Of course, if you would be wiling to "serve" the soldiers, and "boost" their morale, then maybe we can keep you our of harm's way away from combat.

Now many think it would never go this far. But we never imagined that they would deliberately poison us with vaccines or spread harmful things in chemtrails or rape kids in Satanic cults, either. But all those have happened and much more. Satan wants to totally ruin all virtue and decency. And ladies, Satan has you on his menu to serve up any and all men for their pleasure and your misery. My prediction only get closer and more likely. Stay tuned!


Power, Idealism, Corruption
Back to Top

A few more things must be said. I know full well many of you must be shocked at what I am proposing, even though I have given good examples of why it is plausible, and, based on history, likely, if not inevitable. But I got one more for you to consider. We have likely heard this one: "Power Corrupts, and ultimate power corrupts, ultimately." To rephrase it for more understanding, when one has ultimate power, such as a group who controls all business and wealth, most nations and armies, and acts in arrogant mean-spirited ways, has no one who can stop them. They are all powerful. With that being the case, anything that they want to do, they can do, and there is no other power on earth that can stop them. Only God would qualify now.

Since mankind has always been plagued with both good and bad desires, we all struggle to keep from getting overwhelmed by our bad sides. But if power gives in to their bad sides, there will be none to stop that. If you were fully read up on conspiracy and secret government mind control technology, not to mention, what is far more obvious in political policies, then it should be quite clear that those ruling over us have no more good intentions left and only want to do harm. Mix corrupted desire and pleasure into that mix, you have a very bad combination that spells doom for any remaining decency in the human race.

Consider this. All humans who have power get corrupted by it. Its just too tempting to let our lesser inclinations come to the fore and be indulged. Why, even the devil himself, a spirit without the drives and appetites that we creatures of flesh have, that drive and motivate us; still this spirit got seduced by his skill and ability and thought himself equal to God and deserving of what God had. Many other spirits joined the devil in his rebellion in the days of Noah. So power is the ultimate temptation and corruptive force that only God and His son, along with loyal angels, have been able to resist, and remain constrained and restrained from being inconsiderate of human feelings and dignity.

Though the Heavenly Father is exponentially greater in power, knowledge, and status, He does not treat us as if we did not count or matter. But Satan and his crowd do not give a damn about us. We can see the contrast. Satan uses brute force in the end. The antichrist, as a sort of representative of Satan the devil, will pretend to hate corruption and might briefly make many things better, to fool us and get us to go along with him and accept him as "Jesus and God." But before its all done, he will turn to brute power and world-wide massive blood shed. But much of the killing will appear as pollution, diseases of new strains, "natural" disasters, which are really caused by secret powerful technology they now have. So these, though cause by antichrist and his secret supporters, will not seem that way to the public, who are blissfully unaware of the capabilities of those who secretly rule the world.

Those in power will try to eliminate all decent people left or lock them away, and leave nothing but corrupt evil ones who love to use others for their own selfish pleasure; and cause much harm to those who are used. Because ultimate power has been accomplished and soon, even to be announced and enforced openly, rather than in secret, as it has been for some time; there will no longer be tolerated, any dissent or objection to this un-opposable power. Only God can oppose them at this point, and God has just a few more things to prove yet, and then He will act. But He needs to show us just how far rebellion goes, after it starts. He wants us to see the full level of madness that results. We need to remember so that we appreciate why teaching and nurturing kids is so very important, in order to maintain peace and perfection, once it is restored again By God and only by God. We do not have the power or ability to save ourselves.

Just to make it clear, sex is probably the most powerful narcotic drive that exists in human nature. Take brute power and intense sexual desire and put them together and what do you have? Disaster. Rape becomes the rule of law. Total corruption is NOT just a possibility or likelihood. It is the only inevitable outcome of complete total power and we are seeing it now. The determination to ban all guns, is evidence of the worst of intent by power. Power fears and hates any other power, whoever small it might be.

"The less reasonable a cult is, the more men seek to establish it by force."
Jean-Jacques Rousseau

When we combine that with utter hate, which both devil and his mighty followers on earth both have, then only the very worst is possible for planet Earth. Fact! Can you accept that?


Superiority Complex, an Utter Evil
Back to Top

The most common (in fact, its never missing from power) trait, is the Superiority belief that those in power hold. It has 2 aspects. If one is going to make other people subordinate and enslaved, one must try to justify it in their minds or suffer the pains of a conscience. So they tell themselves that those they are enslaving are inferior and should serve the superior and more capable. This allows the elite to feel better about what they are doing. Remember, they have to convince their young, who still might have come conscience and decency left, that this is so.

As well, if a group comes to power, and they want to preserve that power and legacy, and have it carry on through their descendants, then they must take measures to insure that they remain on top with no competition from any other "force" or peoples. So they only cooperate with their own group, exclusively. They do not let outsiders in. Romans once went so far as to try to ban members of the Patrician (upper) class from marrying people of the Plebian (lower) class. It did not get passed due to plebian protest of the intentions of the upper class. But they did not need to pass it, for Royalty and nobility have always maintained this policy, whether a law or not.

So whether you think you're better or just want to stay on top, you need to separate your allies from your competitors and enemies. But in the end, they are both forms of elitism. The upper class of enslavers must keep the slaves in submission.

So today, we have an elite ruling the world. They can easily use and hurt people because they believe those little people are inferior dogs, anyway. This is what the slaves and plebs of today are up against. We see this in particular with the views of women by many. On the streets of gangs, they are Hoe's and Bitches. To the elite, they are dumb sheep who are easily dominated and do as told. Many men feel threatened by their need for a woman's sexual gifts. So they beat women into giving up a fight or having any self-esteem. Now we are close to just making them into sex slaves who exist, solely for the sexual pleasure of men, who of course, must be superior in their minds, so that women should gladly accept the position made for them by the elite. There was a time when it was not much fun to be a woman. They thought they gained some sort of advantage by becoming liberated, so they thought. Little did they know, it would amount to their ultimate enslavement. It will soon be a reality.

And kids? They never did count much in adult eyes, anyway. Did anyone really ever care about what a kid thought or felt? Even a young teen who fall in love; our laws and we all say that their feelings have no merit and do not matter and that they do not know what they are doing. Indeed, they might need a little guidance, but to negate completely their feelings does not do much for the adult world, which becomes a world those slighted teens hate. Teens were designed to marry in God's design and plan. The urges are very strong, and emotions a bit exaggerated. This is to help the bonding process, which the parents help by instructing and guiding youths as they grow so that when they arrive at 12 or 13, they will be ready to marry.

This allows the young to relieve those very intense passions, which completely dominate them as was likely intended. They begin work and responsibility and continue to receive guidance from the older community. But we throw all that out the window. Now the young relieve their urges in far more harmful ways and with much more damage such as illegitimate births, and raising kids with just one parent. So it is the young and the women who really suffer when men show indifference to these.

Related to this superiority doctrine, in some ways, is the next. One must be powerful and brutal, without mercy, if one wants to stay in power. Yes and No. If strict control is not maintained, it is likely that sooner or later, a groups will grow and decide to try to change the order of the classes. I am talking about an overthrow. But in all cases, those who overthrow are no better than those they overtake or they will soon become like those they overtake, if they are not immediately that way.

But there have been limited small groups of people living somewhat equally, but eventually, selfish inclinations creep in and ruin the good times. Human nature is the problem, for corruption is the natural state of us all. Some of us can admit it and try to keep it subdued as much as we can and others seek to let it run wild. But our "rebellion" in the garden of Eden and all the many rebellions of history since then, have doomed us all to great misery.


The Ideal Man
Back to Top

We know the traits of evil. But there are yet things to consider. The prescription for stopping all bullies, is for every person to pursue goodness, kindness, decency, mercy, compassion, empathy, tenderness, gentleness and the like. You recall my reference to the young couple who show such strong sensitivity and responsiveness to each other, holding the other in their heart with tenderness and deep caring. We are talking about the very exact opposite of power here.

A man is said to be a man, if he is tough, brave, courageous, ever ready and willing to fight and even die for a cause. He is not supposed to openly show emotion and is supposed to be in emotional control at all times and if he should cry or show hurt or fear, then most consider him weak and pathetic or disgusting. What that is pure nonsense. Let me show you.

A real man is one who can love a woman and bring out the best in her and treat her decently, showing affection and appreciation often. He is also one who shows extreme care and sensitivity with his children, protecting and respecting their feelings, and gently teaching and directly them in the ways they should go. We can only get good out of people if we show them good. We can only fight bullies with kindness to others, so that they can see the contrast and difference between bullies and nice loving people. This is why God has let things go to their ultimate fulfillment, so that we have that contrast between God and the devil.

Yes, a man has to be firm at times, and take tough stands, but in doing so, he can not allow himself to become hardened, cruel, or ruthless. Many men, determined to fight and resist wickedness, are willing to become as wicked as those they oppose, in order to beat those they oppose. Rephrased, In order to win, they are willing to become just like their enemies, which is not a win, not a victory, and is a total loss and total defeat. Becoming the same as the enemy is the worst thing you could do.

It is not whether you win or lose, it is remaining what you ultimately want to be. If you want to be a loving father and husband, you cannot compromise and be like the enemy. Compromise is the problem. We who serve God must resist trying to beat Satan. God did not assign us to beat Satan. God knows we would have to become like Satan (or his followers, really) to do that. God does not want that. God wants us to avoid becoming like Satan and to start trying to be like God and be a good kind person toward all.

To beat bullies, we must avoid becoming bullies. This is the only way to approach this. Then, at the least, when God finally ends the madness and begins judgment, He will look for those who did not sink to the same level as most did. God wants people who do their best to be the best they can be.

So a man must pursue tenderness and sensitivity to some degree. He can not remain hard, aloof, remote, unavailable. He must keep the doors open, so to speak. To be sensitive, means to risk hurt feelings and maybe even cry. That is how we are supposed to be.

But I note in our society that crying or breaking down is considered a paramount weakness and failure. But, Jesus cried when encountering Martha and Mary crying over their brother Lazarus, who had died. The display of emotion in others was something Jesus was sensitive to and could not control tears of empathy.

But many still alive remember Senator Muskie running for President in early 72. Some criticism was brought up in a question and Muskie had some brief tears. Everyone turned their back on him after that, as if he was no longer a man and that nothing he did previously meant a damn thing. It was absurd. No man is perfect or has perfect control and though we would all like to be composed and cry in private, sometimes emotions get through anyway. This is not such a bad sign at all.

Watching Celebrity Apprentice with Donald Trump one time, Lisa Lampanelli, who had shown very good skills in her various assignments, showed a few brief tears and she was judged harshly and they thought she was not strong. I completely disagree and did not agree with their assessment of her at all. Regardless of tears, she had been capable and would and did remain capable, even if she did not ultimately win. I began to lose interest after that show, because I was disappointed in their holding on to that old myth of tears are weakness. It takes a tough man to recover from tears. And if one is to be a leader, he had better have some compassion and empathy, or I would not be interested in him as a candidate.

We got to get the old stupid ideas out of our heads and realize that unless we ascend to greater levels of human compassion and respect for others, that we are doomed. It is that serious. For anyone to tell you that guns are what is killing us, then you are looking at a liar. It is our own indifference and insensitivity that is killing us and everyone around us. If we do not begin to care about each other and have altruistic love for each other, then we are doomed.

So yes, a real man might have a few public tears. It is part of having enough sensitivity within, which we need if we are to rise above hate. We have to pursue as much positive traits as possible and restrain as much badness and negativity as possible. If we try with all our power, then if we fall a little bit short, we will still achieve high marks. But if we aim really low and still fall short, we might find ourselves on the bottom of the barrel and out of luck.

I once had a friend who badly needed to lose weight. I recommended some nutrients as well as walks of at least a half hour, briskly. He was very lazy and very big. But he only wanted to do the minimum and do as little as he could and still make some progress. I told him that I could guarantee he was going to fail, because he was trying to do as little as possible, when he should only consider doing as much as possible. The attitude was all wrong. He did fail. He did not want to exert himself and never had and never will. He is doomed to fail in all things. It can not be avoided, if you have the wrong attitude or make the wrong choice. Its your choice now!

This article came about just after several other articles, and has a few others rather relevant to this article, so I am linking them all here below for you to consider.



Related Articles

These 3 below all strongly relate to each other.
I call them a trilogy ;-)

Bullying, Harassment = PTSD
The Credibility Gap
Irrational Fears and Superstition

http://www.lef.org/lpages/WarOnHealth/index.htm  

http://personalliberty.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

Christian Community
Educate Your Children
Our Sinfulness
The Christian Conscience
Danger Signs of a Cult?
Sexual Topics Page


Back to Home/Index       Truth 1 - The best site on the internet!

Back to Top